RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    개발제한구역 보전부담금 징수제도 개선방안

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103427782

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The Greenbelt Preservation Charge is operated based on The Management Act of Charges. The Greenbelt Preservation Charge is included in Balanced Regional Development Special Accounts. Service fees are paid to local governments when the Greenbelt Preservation Charge is collected. However, the collecting service fee of the Greenbelt Preservation Charge is lower than other collecting service fees. The purpose of the study is to provide logical basis to raise the collecting service fee of the Greenbelt Preservation Charge.
    The study investigates that 22 charges among 30 charges which contain service fees in their acts, suggest 10% or more of collected charges as collecting service fees. The collected Greenbelt Preservation Charge has not been used fully, therefore accumulated surpluses have been increased as years go by. Thus the central government has enough fund to raise the collecting service fee. The distribution of the charge is not proportional to the imposition of that. Also, local governments appeal the lack of maintenance budget.
    The study suggests that as fundamental alternatives 1) a special account for the Greenbelt Preservation Charge must be introduced for their own autonomy of local governments; 2) The distribution ratio of the collected charge which belong to Balanced Regional Development Special Accounts should be reduced. For a short term remedies 1) the collecting service fee of the Greenbelt Preservation Charge should be raised more than 10% of the collected charges like other charges; 2) The distribution ratio of the charge should be increased such as 40-50% to local governments to maintain greenbelt areas.
    번역하기

    The Greenbelt Preservation Charge is operated based on The Management Act of Charges. The Greenbelt Preservation Charge is included in Balanced Regional Development Special Accounts. Service fees are paid to local governments when the Greenbelt Preser...

    The Greenbelt Preservation Charge is operated based on The Management Act of Charges. The Greenbelt Preservation Charge is included in Balanced Regional Development Special Accounts. Service fees are paid to local governments when the Greenbelt Preservation Charge is collected. However, the collecting service fee of the Greenbelt Preservation Charge is lower than other collecting service fees. The purpose of the study is to provide logical basis to raise the collecting service fee of the Greenbelt Preservation Charge.
    The study investigates that 22 charges among 30 charges which contain service fees in their acts, suggest 10% or more of collected charges as collecting service fees. The collected Greenbelt Preservation Charge has not been used fully, therefore accumulated surpluses have been increased as years go by. Thus the central government has enough fund to raise the collecting service fee. The distribution of the charge is not proportional to the imposition of that. Also, local governments appeal the lack of maintenance budget.
    The study suggests that as fundamental alternatives 1) a special account for the Greenbelt Preservation Charge must be introduced for their own autonomy of local governments; 2) The distribution ratio of the collected charge which belong to Balanced Regional Development Special Accounts should be reduced. For a short term remedies 1) the collecting service fee of the Greenbelt Preservation Charge should be raised more than 10% of the collected charges like other charges; 2) The distribution ratio of the charge should be increased such as 40-50% to local governments to maintain greenbelt areas.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • [표지]
    • [연구요약]
    • [차례]
    • 표차례
    • 그림차례
    • [표지]
    • [연구요약]
    • [차례]
    • 표차례
    • 그림차례
    • [제1장 서론]
    • 제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적
    • 제2절 연구의 방법 및 흐름
    • [제2장 보전부담금 부과·징수 및 사용 현황]
    • 제1절 부담금 징수제도
    • 제2절 개발제한구역 보전부담금 및 징수제도
    • 제3절 보전부담금 부과·징수 및 사용 현황
    • 제4절 보전부담금 징수 및 사용상의 문제점
    • [제3장 타 부담금 부과·징수 및 사용 사례]
    • 제1절 타 부담금 부과·징수 현황
    • 제2절 시사점
    • [제4장 보전부담금 징수제도 개선방안]
    • 제1절 근본적 개선방안
    • 제2절 단기적 개선방안
    • 제3절 법령개정(안)
    • [제5장 결론 및 정책제언]
    • 제1절 결론
    • 제2절 정책제언
    • [참고문헌]
    • [Abstract]
    • [부록]
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼