서정인 소설의 소통과 미의식 = The communication and the aesthetic consciousness in Seo Jeong-in's novels

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The objective of this study is to reveal how the aesthetic consciousness, which is the main communicative characteristic of novelist Jeong-In Soe, is concretized in terms of both contents and forms in a systemic way. In his works, reality problems are criticized in a cynical or humorous way. An antipathy of falsehood analyzes the exposed fact, verifies the sincerity, and questions the linguistic sincerity, in other words, the value and dignity of the language.
His pursuit of inside and sincerity is concretized by virtue of dialogic characteristic in a narrative strategy from the perspective of formality. However, in order to discuss the dialogic property, the understanding of the characteristics of the characters is required. The characters in Jeong-In Seo's novels are as much typical as they show the various opinions and the pursuit of truthfulness are achieved by contrasting their differences. The characters are divided into two groups. One group possess both the prospective hope and solidarity and the other group abandon themselves to despair in a repetitive life style. In a dialogic imagination, the thoughts and words of the characters fall into two categories. one is the case where different viewpoints are showed and thus fails to co-exist or interact each other. The other notices the progress of a particular event or reveals the way where they come closer to the truth throughout the dialogues. The first shows how the true communication can be achieved by embracing the wrong dialogues or communication barriers whereas the second is based on the criticism of the defined truth or fixed reality.
The dialogic imagination avoids the absolute viewpoint and combines the polyphony and free indirect narration effectively. The polyphony means there are multiple voices not a single one in a narration. There are two types of polyphony in novels. One is the case where two or more voices are overlapped focused on the characters' words. In this case, the voice of narrator support the individual voices and add more credibility on each person.
The other one is the case where the voices of the characters are overlapped based on narrator's words. In this case, the narrator exist deep inside of the character and enables the readers to easily identify the characters. Not only for that, the psychological status of the character is described without recognition of the character itself and the complex spiritual world of modern people are expressed easily. On the other hand, the polyphony and free indirect narration, which recognize the relative viewpoints, are effectively connected with colloquial language. This language represents the middle class life style. The immature colloquial style of language are used in a natural way. The use of language in Pansori, which is Korean traditional narrative song, and dialects are good examples.
Dialogic imagination dilemmatically provides a new passage of communication throughout communication-barrier situation, makes the readers worry about the solutions by recognizing the barrier circumstances, produces critic consciousness against truthful reasonableness. In addition, the relativism, embodied in this way, prefers the indecisive status and requests the participation of the readers by refusing one conclusive message.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 서론
• 2. 희망에의 기대 혹은 소성적 삶
• 3. 공존의 탐색과 대화적 상상력
• 4. 서술전략으로서의 다성성과 자유간 접화법
• 5. 결론

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김윤식, "한국소설사" 문학동네 2004

2 이미란, "한국 현대 소설과 패러디" 국학자료원 1999

3 한용환, "소설학사전" 문예출판사 1999

4 권택영, "소설을 어떻게 볼 것인가" 문예출판사 1995

5 김 현, "세계 인식의 변모와 의미 in 강" 문학과지성사 321-, 2004

6 최혜실, "서정인론" 한국비평문학회 9 : 390-,

7 이경혜, "서정인 소설의 현실인식 연구" 고려대 2006

8 백지은, "서정인 소설의 다성성 연구" 고대 1999

9 윤혜경, "서정인 소설 연구" 연대 1998

10 황도경, "서술의 공백과 열려진 독서 체험; 서정인의 「밤이야기」읽기" 문학사상사 223 : 1991

11 J.주네뜨, "서사담론" 교보문고 1992

12 서정인, "붕어" 세계사 1994

13 김태환, "부서진 액자 in 용병대장" 문학과지성사 302-303, 2000

14 김주연, "보편성의 위기와 소설 in 벌판" 나남출판사 1984

15 서정인, "벌판" 나남 1984

16 임명진, "반리얼리즘에서 신리얼리즘으로…; 서정인,윤후명의 경우" 열음사 68 : 55-, 1992

17 E.아우얼바하, "미메시스" 민음사 1979

18 김태희, "문학과 영화에서의 자유간접화법" 프랑스학회 39 (39): 313-334, 2007

19 강상희, "말과 삶의 현상학" 동아출판사 46 : 1995

20 서정인, "리얼리즘고 in 벌판" 나남출판사 1984

21 M.바흐찐, "도스토예프스키 시학" 정음사 1989

22 선주원, "대화적 관점에서의 소설교육―자유간접화법을 중심으로―" 한국문학연구학회 19 : 105-130, 2002

23 W.J.옹, "구술문화와 문자문화" 문예출판사 1995

24 서정인, "강" 문학과 지성사 1976

25 최인자, "「달궁」에 나타난 서사담론 생산방법으로서의 대화화" 한국국어교육연구회 98 : 1998

26 M.바흐찐, "Le marxisme et la philosophie du langage, Ed. de Minuit"

27 M.Holquist, "Dialogism" London and New York 48-, 1990