‘眯眯眼’과 인종차별 논란에 대한 고찰 = An Examination of ‘Mimiyan(slant-eyed)’ and the Controversy Over Racial Discrimination

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In examining the controversy surrounding ‘Mimiyan’ in the animation ‘I Am What I Am’, it becomes evident that this issue in China extends beyond a mere lack of appreciation for diversity in beauty. It is intricately linked to historical and cultural backgrounds, as well as a history of racial discrimination against East Asians, particularly the Chinese. The Western ideology of ‘Yellow Peril’ justified colonialism and aggression towards East Asia, fostering a negative perception of the Chinese. Under this backdrop, characters like ‘Fu-Manchu’ emerged, and the West used ‘Mimiyan’ as an image code, creating a distorted and negative portrayal of the Chinese, thereby promoting racial discrimination. Consequently, ‘Mimiyan’ transcended its literal meaning as a physical eye shape to symbolize racial discrimination and insult towards the Chinese.
Although extreme racial discrimination, as seen in ideologies like ‘Yellow Peril’ and laws such as the ‘Chinese Exclusion Act’, has dissipated, the history of racial discrimination persists. Western brands like D&G, Gucci, and Dior stirred controversy in China with their advertisements, where the ‘Mimiyan’ code stemmed from a Western orientalist perspective and a misconstrued understanding and stereotype of the Chinese.
However, the controversies surrounding the ‘Sanzhisongshu’ advertisement and ‘I Am What I Am’ suggest that these instances reflect an inability of Chinese society to acknowledge the diversity of beauty, potentially marking the emergence of excessive nationalism and a new form of discrimination. Such controversies could prompt serious discussions within Chinese society about diversity in beauty and racial discrimination. This dialogue is crucial for fostering recognition and acceptance of diversity and individuality within Chinese society and culture. It could strengthen China's cultural identity and facilitate harmonious communication with global cultural trends.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 샘 밀러 저, "이주하는 인류" 미래의 창 4-424, 2023

2 레이 초우저, "원시적 열정-시각, 섹슈얼리티, 민족지, 현대중국영화" 이산 9-355, 2004

3 에드워드 사이드저, "오리엔탈리즘" 교보문고 5-725, 2009

4 손인서, "미국의 아시아인, ‘영원한 이방인’ : 애틀랜타 총격사건과 아시아계 인종차별의 뿌리" 우리신학연구소 (32) : 71-79, 2021

5 WUJUAN, "동양주체의 중국 재현: 타자, 전치, 셀프-오리엔탈리즘" 글로벌문화콘텐츠학회 (45) : 253-273, 2020

6 홍주희, "동양인만 게걸스럽게 맨손 식사, 돌체앤가바나 ‘인종차별 상습범’"

7 두행숙, "독일황제 빌헬름 2세의 동아시아 정책과 황화론의 실체" 한국독일어문학회 92 : 47-72, 2021

8 原创, "他是『雄狮少年』背后的男人，用14年打造出国漫之光，却遭误解"

9 董書華, "中國時尚傳播的東方化與自我東方化 ——基於對“眯眯眼”審美" 宁夏大学学报（人文社会科学版） 45 (45): 155-162, 2023

10 杜虎, "三只松鼠模特回应 “丑化国人”质疑，反歧视不能走极端"

11 华强, "三只松鼠冲上热搜，模特因小眼睛被指责辱华，公开声明：天生的"

12 走走小姐, "『雄獅少年』：它以“裸奔”的狀態出現在市場上，觀眾失去了坐標”"

13 余亮, "≪雄狮少年≫，眯眯眼，和视觉时代的战争(『웅사소년』, ‘眯眯眼’, 비주얼 시대의 전쟁)"

14 原创, "≪雄狮少年≫ 的问题，是关于“眯眯眼美丑定义权”的争夺(『웅사소년』 문제, ‘眯眯眼’의 미추에 대해 정의에 대한 논쟁의 문을 열다.)"

15 왕지웅, "‘찢어진 눈’ 중국 식품회사 광고, 뭇매에 사과"

16 Sax Rohmer, "The Insidious Dr. Fu-Manchu, The Project Gutenberg E-Book"

17 "D&G辱华事件"

18 이미경, "BBC, ‘작은 눈 중국인 비하 논란’ 조명…“특정한 외모 아름다움으로 고집”"