RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    시대상의 재현 기록으로서 방송·영상 큐레이션 : 지상파 TV 평가·선별을 중심으로

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T15480170

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      서울 : 韓國外國語大學校 大學院, 2020

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(석사) -- 韓國外國語大學校 大學院 , 정보·기록학과 , 2020. 2

    • 발행연도

      2020

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • DDC

      025 판사항(22)

    • 발행국(도시)

      서울

    • 기타서명

      Broadcasting and audiovisual records curation as a representation of the time period : focused on appraisal and selection of public television

    • 형태사항

      iv, 121 p. : 삽도 ; 26 cm

    • 일반주기명

      한국외국어대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
      지도교수: 노명환
      참고문헌: p. 112-119

    • UCI식별코드

      I804:11059-200000282135

    • 소장기관
      • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
      • 한국외국어대학교 글로벌캠퍼스 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 한국외국어대학교 서울캠퍼스 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Public broadcasting played an important role in the development of modern nations after the Korean War. Thus, public broadcasting is a strong candidate for historical records. The purpose of this study is to recognize TV as a historical record in the long term and to present Appraisal and Selection criteria for curation.
    First, this study discussed the meaning of the image “representation.” The representation of the image becomes a sign. There is an ‘ideologic’ attribute inherent in the process of representing images. Broadcasting infuses various ideas into people and forms collective memory. In addition, we have outlined the theoretical flow of classical appraisal of public records.
    Next, the indicators for appraising broadcasting and Audiovisual records as representation of time period were divided into quantitative and qualitative elements. The audience rating, topic index and journalism algorithms, which are quantitative indicators, were discussed. However, qualitative factors were further reviewed because quantitative indicators have limitations in apprasing broadcasting records. TV program ‘quality’ and ‘informational value’ were reviewed.
    In an in-depth interview with TV station workers, they were asked about the subjectivity of the broadcasting production and the validity of the appraisal elements. TV station workers considered both quantitative and qualitative elements to be important. And they commonly chose ‘informational value’ as the most important element of apprasing broadcasting records. TV station workers demanded preservation of diverse and rich images.
    In particular, we examined how appraisal and selection connect preservation and curation within the curation cycle. Curation is associated with creating value for users. Based on all the discussions, the appraisal and selection criteria of broadcasting records for digital curation were presented. It was classified into ‘economic value’, ‘impact’, ‘content quality’, ‘informational value’, and ‘use value’, and detailed elements were presented.
    This paper considers TV broadcasting and audiovisual records as representation of the time period. It is intended to be passed down as a ‘Audiovisual heritage’ in the long term. In addition, It was a study to discuss whether it would be placed in the curation structure that creates new value.
    번역하기

    Public broadcasting played an important role in the development of modern nations after the Korean War. Thus, public broadcasting is a strong candidate for historical records. The purpose of this study is to recognize TV as a historical record in the ...

    Public broadcasting played an important role in the development of modern nations after the Korean War. Thus, public broadcasting is a strong candidate for historical records. The purpose of this study is to recognize TV as a historical record in the long term and to present Appraisal and Selection criteria for curation.
    First, this study discussed the meaning of the image “representation.” The representation of the image becomes a sign. There is an ‘ideologic’ attribute inherent in the process of representing images. Broadcasting infuses various ideas into people and forms collective memory. In addition, we have outlined the theoretical flow of classical appraisal of public records.
    Next, the indicators for appraising broadcasting and Audiovisual records as representation of time period were divided into quantitative and qualitative elements. The audience rating, topic index and journalism algorithms, which are quantitative indicators, were discussed. However, qualitative factors were further reviewed because quantitative indicators have limitations in apprasing broadcasting records. TV program ‘quality’ and ‘informational value’ were reviewed.
    In an in-depth interview with TV station workers, they were asked about the subjectivity of the broadcasting production and the validity of the appraisal elements. TV station workers considered both quantitative and qualitative elements to be important. And they commonly chose ‘informational value’ as the most important element of apprasing broadcasting records. TV station workers demanded preservation of diverse and rich images.
    In particular, we examined how appraisal and selection connect preservation and curation within the curation cycle. Curation is associated with creating value for users. Based on all the discussions, the appraisal and selection criteria of broadcasting records for digital curation were presented. It was classified into ‘economic value’, ‘impact’, ‘content quality’, ‘informational value’, and ‘use value’, and detailed elements were presented.
    This paper considers TV broadcasting and audiovisual records as representation of the time period. It is intended to be passed down as a ‘Audiovisual heritage’ in the long term. In addition, It was a study to discuss whether it would be placed in the curation structure that creates new value.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목 차
    • 제1장 서론 1
    • 제1절 연구목적 1
    • 제2절 선행연구 3
    • 목 차
    • 제1장 서론 1
    • 제1절 연구목적 1
    • 제2절 선행연구 3
    • 제3절 연구의 대상과 방법 5
    • 제2장 시대상의 재현물로서 방송·영상 기록의 개념과 이론 8
    • 제1절 영상의 재현과 이데올로기 8
    • 1. 영상의 재현 8
    • 2. 재현의 이데올로기 13
    • 제2절 재현 기록으로서의 방송 19
    • 1. 방송의 의미와 핵심 이념 19
    • 2. 방송·영상 기록의 특징과 요건 24
    • 제3절 방송·영상 기록을 위한 평가·선별의 이론적 논의 29
    • 제3장 방송·영상 평가·선별 요소의 실재적(實在的) 검토 35
    • 제1절 정량적 평가·선별 요소 35
    • 1. 시청률 35
    • 2. 화제성과 통합시청지표 41
    • 3. 알고리즘 저널리즘: 그룹화와 서열화 48
    • 제2절 정성적 평가·선별 요소 53
    • 1. 방송 품질 53
    • 2. 정보적 가치 60
    • 제3절 소결 65
    • 제4장 평가·선별 준거 도출을 위한 방송제작진 심층 면담 67
    • 제1절 심층 면담 목적과 설계 67
    • 제2절 심층 면담 결과 72
    • 1. 숫자에 함축된 시대상 72
    • 2. 진실을 위한 사실의 재구성 77
    • 3. 시대를 반영하는 정보적 가치의 중요성 82
    • 4. 모두가 아키비스트 84
    • 제3절 소결 89
    • 제5장 디지털 큐레이션을 위한 방송·영상 기록의 평가·선별 91
    • 제1절 방송·영상 기록의 평가·선별 논의와 수집 범위 91
    • 제2절 디지털 큐레이션 확장: DCC Curation Lifecycle Model 97
    • 제3절 방송·영상 기록의 평가·선별 프레임워크(framework) 103
    • 제6장 결론 108
    • 참고문헌 112
    • Abstracts 120
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼