RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      컴퓨터기반 영어 읽기 시험에 대한 수험생 인식 = Test takers’ perceptions on a CBT English reading test

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103538230

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study explored how test-takers perceive computer-based test (CBT) features in a CBT reading test. This study collected research data from 5,391 high school students who took National English Ability Test (NEAT). This study employed both quantitative and qualitative research methods; meaning that the research data includes students’ survey responses as well as interviews with 27 students among them. First, a survey was conducted to find out the perceptions on the usefulness of the CBT features in the reading test. The survey data was statistically analyzed in terms of gender, region, test levels (Level 2 & Level 3), and grade. Second, the semi-structured interviews were conducted to collect more in-depth data on how the CBT features affect students’ performance in the reading test. The findings from these triangulated data suggest that the students had positive responses to the usefulness of most of the features in the CBT reading test. However, the findings also suggest that some CBT features need to be revised to attain the level of flexibility that is provided by a paper-based reading test. The findings are discussed and implications for pedagogy are suggested.
      번역하기

      This study explored how test-takers perceive computer-based test (CBT) features in a CBT reading test. This study collected research data from 5,391 high school students who took National English Ability Test (NEAT). This study employed both quantitat...

      This study explored how test-takers perceive computer-based test (CBT) features in a CBT reading test. This study collected research data from 5,391 high school students who took National English Ability Test (NEAT). This study employed both quantitative and qualitative research methods; meaning that the research data includes students’ survey responses as well as interviews with 27 students among them. First, a survey was conducted to find out the perceptions on the usefulness of the CBT features in the reading test. The survey data was statistically analyzed in terms of gender, region, test levels (Level 2 & Level 3), and grade. Second, the semi-structured interviews were conducted to collect more in-depth data on how the CBT features affect students’ performance in the reading test. The findings from these triangulated data suggest that the students had positive responses to the usefulness of most of the features in the CBT reading test. However, the findings also suggest that some CBT features need to be revised to attain the level of flexibility that is provided by a paper-based reading test. The findings are discussed and implications for pedagogy are suggested.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. 서론
      • II. 선행 연구
      • II. 연구 방법
      • IV.결과 및 논의
      • V. 결론 및 제언
      • I. 서론
      • II. 선행 연구
      • II. 연구 방법
      • IV.결과 및 논의
      • V. 결론 및 제언
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 진수경, "컴퓨터기반 평가와 지필 평가 수행 결과 비교 : 한국 대학생의 영어 독해 평가 중심으로" 이화여자대학교 2006

      2 조보경, "국가영어능력평가시험 읽기 영역 IBT 기능에 대한 인식 및 문항 난이도에 미치는 영향 분석" 한국교육과정평가원 2012

      3 교육과학기술부, "국가영어능력평가시험 개발 방안"

      4 노윤오, "고등학생의 영어 독해력 측정을 위한 컴퓨터기반 평가와 지필기반 평가 결과 비교" 한국교원대학교 교육대학원 2011

      5 Taylor, C., "Trends in computer use among international students" 34 (34): 575-585, 2000

      6 Pomplun, M., "The score equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computerized versions of a speeded test of reading comprehension" 62 : 337-354, 2002

      7 Jones, N., "The role of technology in language testing" 12 : 3-4, 2003

      8 Taylor, C., "The relationship between computer familiarity and performance on computer-based TOEFL test tasks" Educational Testing Service 1998

      9 McDonald, A., "The impact of individual differences on the equivalence of computer-based and paper-and-pencil educational assessments" 39 : 299-312, 2002

      10 Maycock, L., "The effects on performance of computer familiarity and attitudes towards BC IELTS" University of Cambridge ESOL 3-8, 2005

      1 진수경, "컴퓨터기반 평가와 지필 평가 수행 결과 비교 : 한국 대학생의 영어 독해 평가 중심으로" 이화여자대학교 2006

      2 조보경, "국가영어능력평가시험 읽기 영역 IBT 기능에 대한 인식 및 문항 난이도에 미치는 영향 분석" 한국교육과정평가원 2012

      3 교육과학기술부, "국가영어능력평가시험 개발 방안"

      4 노윤오, "고등학생의 영어 독해력 측정을 위한 컴퓨터기반 평가와 지필기반 평가 결과 비교" 한국교원대학교 교육대학원 2011

      5 Taylor, C., "Trends in computer use among international students" 34 (34): 575-585, 2000

      6 Pomplun, M., "The score equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computerized versions of a speeded test of reading comprehension" 62 : 337-354, 2002

      7 Jones, N., "The role of technology in language testing" 12 : 3-4, 2003

      8 Taylor, C., "The relationship between computer familiarity and performance on computer-based TOEFL test tasks" Educational Testing Service 1998

      9 McDonald, A., "The impact of individual differences on the equivalence of computer-based and paper-and-pencil educational assessments" 39 : 299-312, 2002

      10 Maycock, L., "The effects on performance of computer familiarity and attitudes towards BC IELTS" University of Cambridge ESOL 3-8, 2005

      11 Ward, T. J. Jr., "The effect of computerized tests on the performance and attitudes of college students" 5 : 327-333, 1989

      12 Vincino, F., "Test-taker’s attitude toward and acceptance of a computerized aptitude test" 1988

      13 Powers, D. E., "Test anxiety and test performance: Comparing paper-based and computer-adaptive versions of the GRE general test" Educational Testing Service 1999

      14 Canale, M., "Technology and language testing" Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages 29-44, 1986

      15 Larson, J., "Studies in language testing, 10. Issues in computer-adaptive testing of reading proficiency" University of Cambridege Press 71-90, 1999

      16 Bodmann, S. M., "Speed and performance differences among computer-based and paper-pencil tests" 31 (31): 51-60, 2004

      17 Wise, S. L., "Research on the effects of administering tests via computers" 8 (8): 5-10, 1990

      18 Grabe, W., "Research on teaching reading" 24 : 44-69, 2004

      19 Clariana, R., "Paper-based versus computer-based assessment:Key factors associated with the test mode effect" 33 : 593-602, 2002

      20 Rosen, L. D., "Myths and realities of computer phobia : A meta-analysis" 3 : 175-191, 1990

      21 Choi, Inn-Chull., "Language testing in the 21st century: Prospects of computer adaptive testing and performance testing" 36 : 205-241, 2000

      22 Dooey, P., "Language testing and technology : Problems of transition to a new era" 20 (20): 21-34, 2008

      23 Powers, D., "Inexperienced and anxious computer users: Coping with a computer-administered test of academic skills" 1 : 153-173, 1993

      24 Pope-Davis, D. B., "How instruction influences attitudes of college men and women towards computers" 9 : 83-93, 1993

      25 Durndell, A., "Gender and computing: Change over time?" 21 : 331-336, 1993

      26 Taylor, C., "Examining the relationship between computer familiarity and performance on computer-based language tasks" 49 : 219-274, 1999

      27 Bridgeman, B., "Effects of screen size, screen resolution, and display rate on computer-based test performance" 16 : 191-205, 2003

      28 Yu, G., "Effects of presentation mode and computer familiarity on summarization of extended texts" 7 : 119-136, 2010

      29 Shermis, M. D., "Effects of computer-based test administrations on test anxiety and performance" 14 (14): 111-123, 1998

      30 Levin, T., "Effect of gender and computer experience on attitudes towards computers" 5 : 69-88, 1989

      31 Harrel, T., "Computerized versus traditional administration of the multidimensional aptitude battery-verbal scale: An examination of reality and validity" 3 : 129-137, 1987

      32 Boo, J., "Computerized versus paper-and-pencil assessment of educational development: Score comparability and examinee preferences" University of Iowa 1997

      33 Al-Amri, S., "Computer-based testing vs. paper-based testing : A comprehensive approach to examining the comparability of testing modes" 10 : 22-44, 2008

      34 Bartram, D., "Computer-based assessment" 9 : 31-69, 1994

      35 Madsen, H., "Computer-assisted language learning and testing: Research issues and practice" Newbury House 237-257, 1991

      36 Todman, J., "Computer anxiety in primary schoolchildren and university students" 18 (18): 63-72, 1992

      37 Howard, G. S., "Computer anxiety considerations for the design of introductory computer courses" Decision Science Institute 630-632, 1986

      38 Mazzeo, J., "Comparability of computer and paper-and-pencil scores for two CLEP general examinations" 1991

      39 Levine, T, "Commitment to learning: Effects of computer experience, confidence and attitudes" 16 (16): 83-105, 1997

      40 Anderson, J. R., "Cognitive psychology and its implications" Worth 2005

      41 Glass, C. R., "Cognitive factors in computer anxiety" 12 : 351-365, 1988

      42 Bear, G. G., "Attitudes toward computers : Validation of a computer attitudes scale" 3 : 207-218, 1987

      43 Mason, B. J., "An examination of the equivalence between non-adaptive computer-based and traditional testing" 24 : 29-39, 2001

      44 Wang, S., "Administration mode comparability study for Stanford Diagnostic Reading and Mathematics Tests" Harcourt 2004

      45 Park, Jennifer., "A test-taker’s perspective" 22 (22): 15-, 2003

      46 Bresolin, M. J., "A comparative study of computer administration of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory in an inpatient psychiatric setting" Loyola University 1984

      47 김영상, "A Factor Analytic Study of English Language Anxiety: The Case of Korean University EFL Learners" 한국영어교육학회 59 (59): 239-256, 2004

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.77 0.77 0.87
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.78 0.81 1.48 0.17
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼