RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    현행 기관소송제도에 관한 소고 = A Study on the Agency Litigation - Focusing on the Subject and Range of Review -

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99628587

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    When a dispute occurs in relation to the "agency's authority", Agency Litigation by the Administrative Litigation Act and Adjudication on Competence Disputes by the Constitutional Court Act exist as the means to resolve a dispute. Both have allowed many problems since their introduction and despite the various suggested solutions, there has been little progress in terms of administrating system and legislation.
    In the perspective of Administrative Law, every issue of dispute settlement system in terms of contestation concludes as the means to activate Agency Litigation. These issues include whether or not to define Agency Litigation as disputes between 'two agencies within equal legal bodies' and abolish the principle of legality of Agency Litigation, and the establishment of relation between Adjudication on Competence Disputes and Agency Litigation, etc.
    These disputes originate, for Adjudication on Competence Disputes has been governing administrative dispute as well as constitutional dispute between the agencies. These do not accord with the essence and purpose of the Constitutional Adjudication System thereby limiting the area of Agency Litigation that tries to avoid the overlap with Adjudication on Competence Disputes.
    The Supreme Court in 2004 and the Justice Department in 2012 have tried to extend the object and scope of Agency Litigation by amending the Administrative Litigation Act. Both amendment bill focused on abolishing the principle of legality of Agency Litigation. However, these efforts reveal limitations, for these took place before the definitive establishment of relation between Agency Litigation and Adjudication on Competence Disputes that accords with the respective Dispute Settlement System.
    The essence and purpose to introduce the system concerned should be focused to resolve the problems related to Agency Litigation and Adjudication on Competence Disputes. Accordingly, systematic improvement is suggested to have Adjudication on Competence Disputes undertake constitutional dispute between the agencies and Agency.
    번역하기

    When a dispute occurs in relation to the "agency's authority", Agency Litigation by the Administrative Litigation Act and Adjudication on Competence Disputes by the Constitutional Court Act exist as the means to resolve a dispute. Both have allowed ma...

    When a dispute occurs in relation to the "agency's authority", Agency Litigation by the Administrative Litigation Act and Adjudication on Competence Disputes by the Constitutional Court Act exist as the means to resolve a dispute. Both have allowed many problems since their introduction and despite the various suggested solutions, there has been little progress in terms of administrating system and legislation.
    In the perspective of Administrative Law, every issue of dispute settlement system in terms of contestation concludes as the means to activate Agency Litigation. These issues include whether or not to define Agency Litigation as disputes between 'two agencies within equal legal bodies' and abolish the principle of legality of Agency Litigation, and the establishment of relation between Adjudication on Competence Disputes and Agency Litigation, etc.
    These disputes originate, for Adjudication on Competence Disputes has been governing administrative dispute as well as constitutional dispute between the agencies. These do not accord with the essence and purpose of the Constitutional Adjudication System thereby limiting the area of Agency Litigation that tries to avoid the overlap with Adjudication on Competence Disputes.
    The Supreme Court in 2004 and the Justice Department in 2012 have tried to extend the object and scope of Agency Litigation by amending the Administrative Litigation Act. Both amendment bill focused on abolishing the principle of legality of Agency Litigation. However, these efforts reveal limitations, for these took place before the definitive establishment of relation between Agency Litigation and Adjudication on Competence Disputes that accords with the respective Dispute Settlement System.
    The essence and purpose to introduce the system concerned should be focused to resolve the problems related to Agency Litigation and Adjudication on Competence Disputes. Accordingly, systematic improvement is suggested to have Adjudication on Competence Disputes undertake constitutional dispute between the agencies and Agency.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서언
    • Ⅱ. 기관소송과 권한쟁의심판의 대상과 범위
    • Ⅲ. 현행법상 기관소송의 종류
    • Ⅳ. 행정소송으로서 기관소송의 위상 정립 방안
    • Ⅴ. 결 어
    • Ⅰ. 서언
    • Ⅱ. 기관소송과 권한쟁의심판의 대상과 범위
    • Ⅲ. 현행법상 기관소송의 종류
    • Ⅳ. 행정소송으로서 기관소송의 위상 정립 방안
    • Ⅴ. 결 어
    • 참고문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼