RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    The Aristocracy in Edward II

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103969325

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Edward II's weakness is the subject of the play, but Marlowe neither impugns his right to the throne nor offers any explanation for his appearance in a line of strong and efficient kings. Marlowe even omits an interesting history about a claimant to the throne: he asserted that he was the rightful kingof England and Edward the son of a carter.
    This paper argues that the play deals with many matters bearing on Elizabethan concepts of the aristocratic family. The source of the chief conflict between the king and the barons is based on the barons's aristocratic pride; the chief complaint of the barons is that the king constantly associates with one substantially his inferior in birth. Edward's lack of interest in his family is more than incidental to his characterization as a weak and irresponsible king: for examples, Edward addresses Gaveston, Spencer, and Baldock as "thou," the young prince as "you"; in the same way, he addresses Gaveston as "brother," and banishes his real brother. However, young Edward, the ideal prince, is dedicated to his family. The contrasts make a responsibility for family relationships an important virtue in the play.
    번역하기

    Edward II's weakness is the subject of the play, but Marlowe neither impugns his right to the throne nor offers any explanation for his appearance in a line of strong and efficient kings. Marlowe even omits an interesting history about a claimant to ...

    Edward II's weakness is the subject of the play, but Marlowe neither impugns his right to the throne nor offers any explanation for his appearance in a line of strong and efficient kings. Marlowe even omits an interesting history about a claimant to the throne: he asserted that he was the rightful kingof England and Edward the son of a carter.
    This paper argues that the play deals with many matters bearing on Elizabethan concepts of the aristocratic family. The source of the chief conflict between the king and the barons is based on the barons's aristocratic pride; the chief complaint of the barons is that the king constantly associates with one substantially his inferior in birth. Edward's lack of interest in his family is more than incidental to his characterization as a weak and irresponsible king: for examples, Edward addresses Gaveston, Spencer, and Baldock as "thou," the young prince as "you"; in the same way, he addresses Gaveston as "brother," and banishes his real brother. However, young Edward, the ideal prince, is dedicated to his family. The contrasts make a responsibility for family relationships an important virtue in the play.

    더보기

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Edward II's weakness is the subject of the play, but Marlowe neither impugns his right to the throne nor offers any explanation for his appearance in a line of strong and efficient kings. Marlowe even omits an interesting history about a claimant to the throne: he asserted that he was the rightful kingof England and Edward the son of a carter.
    This paper argues that the play deals with many matters bearing on Elizabethan concepts of the aristocratic family. The source of the chief conflict between the king and the barons is based on the barons's aristocratic pride; the chief complaint of the barons is that the king constantly associates with one substantially his inferior in birth. Edward's lack of interest in his family is more than incidental to his characterization as a weak and irresponsible king: for examples, Edward addresses Gaveston, Spencer, and Baldock as "thou," the young prince as "you"; in the same way, he addresses Gaveston as "brother," and banishes his real brother. However, young Edward, the ideal prince, is dedicated to his family. The contrasts make a responsibility for family relationships an important virtue in the play.
    번역하기

    Edward II's weakness is the subject of the play, but Marlowe neither impugns his right to the throne nor offers any explanation for his appearance in a line of strong and efficient kings. Marlowe even omits an interesting history about a claimant to ...

    Edward II's weakness is the subject of the play, but Marlowe neither impugns his right to the throne nor offers any explanation for his appearance in a line of strong and efficient kings. Marlowe even omits an interesting history about a claimant to the throne: he asserted that he was the rightful kingof England and Edward the son of a carter.
    This paper argues that the play deals with many matters bearing on Elizabethan concepts of the aristocratic family. The source of the chief conflict between the king and the barons is based on the barons's aristocratic pride; the chief complaint of the barons is that the king constantly associates with one substantially his inferior in birth. Edward's lack of interest in his family is more than incidental to his characterization as a weak and irresponsible king: for examples, Edward addresses Gaveston, Spencer, and Baldock as "thou," the young prince as "you"; in the same way, he addresses Gaveston as "brother," and banishes his real brother. However, young Edward, the ideal prince, is dedicated to his family. The contrasts make a responsibility for family relationships an important virtue in the play.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Perry, Curtis., "The Politics of Access and Representations of the Sodomite King in Early Modern England" 534 : 1054-1081, 2000

    2 Levin,Harry., "The Overreacher: A Study of Christopher Marlowe" Cambridge: Harvard UP 1952

    3 Mills, Laurens. J, "The Meaning of Edward II" 32 : 11-31, 1934

    4 Stymeist, David., "Status, Sodomy, and the Theater in Marlowe's Edward II. Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900 44.2"

    5 Briggs,W.D., "Marlowe's Edward II" London: Macmillan 1914

    6 Camden, Carroll., "Marlowe and Elizabethan Psychology" 8 : 69-78, 1929

    7 Holinshed, Raphael., "Holinshed's Chronicles -- England, Scotland, and Ireland" New York: AMS 1976

    8 Brodwin, Leonora Leet, "Edward II: Marlowe's Culminating Treatment of Love" 21 : 139-155, 1964

    9 Charlton, H. B. and R. D. Waller, eds., "Edward II" New York: Gordian 1966

    10 Pendry, E. D. and J. C. Maxwell, "Christopher Marlowe: Complete Plays and Poems" London: J. M. Dent & Sons 1976

    1 Perry, Curtis., "The Politics of Access and Representations of the Sodomite King in Early Modern England" 534 : 1054-1081, 2000

    2 Levin,Harry., "The Overreacher: A Study of Christopher Marlowe" Cambridge: Harvard UP 1952

    3 Mills, Laurens. J, "The Meaning of Edward II" 32 : 11-31, 1934

    4 Stymeist, David., "Status, Sodomy, and the Theater in Marlowe's Edward II. Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900 44.2"

    5 Briggs,W.D., "Marlowe's Edward II" London: Macmillan 1914

    6 Camden, Carroll., "Marlowe and Elizabethan Psychology" 8 : 69-78, 1929

    7 Holinshed, Raphael., "Holinshed's Chronicles -- England, Scotland, and Ireland" New York: AMS 1976

    8 Brodwin, Leonora Leet, "Edward II: Marlowe's Culminating Treatment of Love" 21 : 139-155, 1964

    9 Charlton, H. B. and R. D. Waller, eds., "Edward II" New York: Gordian 1966

    10 Pendry, E. D. and J. C. Maxwell, "Christopher Marlowe: Complete Plays and Poems" London: J. M. Dent & Sons 1976

    11 Kocher,Paul Harold., "Christopher Marlowe: A Study of His Thought, Learning, and Character" New York: Russell & Russell 1962

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2018 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (계속평가)
    2017-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0 0 0.05
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.04 0.05 0.375 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼