RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    평등교육관과 자아존중 = A Conception of Equal Education and Self-Respect

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75400028

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    It is very difficult to accept a conception of strict equality based on personal substantial states and social condition. Rawls maintains that a viewpoint of human equality should be argued by minimum potential for simple contract theory According to Rawls, we must not depend on natural evidence for discourse about human equality As equality except human equality is a secondary virtue dependent on ethical judgment, formal egalitarianism does not give any implications for education The same educational procedures and results do not work for equal education for human dignity The ideal of equal education must presuppose the self-realization in order to obtain individual self-respect Self-realization and self-respect don`t contain the comparisons of personal goods and individual abilities. Education for real equality must reject the educational viewpoints of liberalism and meritocracy in equality discourse. In equal education based on self-respect we may support Rawlsian difference principle. It regards inequality as justifiable as far as inequality serves to the benefits of the least favored and self-respects of all concerned. So inequality of educational input and output can be accepted If it follows the educational principle of self-realization for self-respect and difference principle
    번역하기

    It is very difficult to accept a conception of strict equality based on personal substantial states and social condition. Rawls maintains that a viewpoint of human equality should be argued by minimum potential for simple contract theory According to ...

    It is very difficult to accept a conception of strict equality based on personal substantial states and social condition. Rawls maintains that a viewpoint of human equality should be argued by minimum potential for simple contract theory According to Rawls, we must not depend on natural evidence for discourse about human equality As equality except human equality is a secondary virtue dependent on ethical judgment, formal egalitarianism does not give any implications for education The same educational procedures and results do not work for equal education for human dignity The ideal of equal education must presuppose the self-realization in order to obtain individual self-respect Self-realization and self-respect don`t contain the comparisons of personal goods and individual abilities. Education for real equality must reject the educational viewpoints of liberalism and meritocracy in equality discourse. In equal education based on self-respect we may support Rawlsian difference principle. It regards inequality as justifiable as far as inequality serves to the benefits of the least favored and self-respects of all concerned. So inequality of educational input and output can be accepted If it follows the educational principle of self-realization for self-respect and difference principle

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Hurn, "The Limit and Possibilities of Schooling" Inc 1978

    2 James, "Talks to Teachers" 1958

    3 & Halsey, "Power & Ideology in Education" Oxford Univ Press 1987

    4 Hirst, "Philosophy of Education" 179-234, 1998

    5 Schrag, "From Here To Equality Grading Policies For Egalitarians" 51 (51): 68-74, 2001

    6 Ennis, "Equality of Educational Opportunity" 3-18, 1976

    7 Rawls, "A Theory of Justice The Belknap Press of Harvard Univ" 1973

    8 Manchester, "A Report on Knowledge" Manchester Univ 1986

    1 Hurn, "The Limit and Possibilities of Schooling" Inc 1978

    2 James, "Talks to Teachers" 1958

    3 & Halsey, "Power & Ideology in Education" Oxford Univ Press 1987

    4 Hirst, "Philosophy of Education" 179-234, 1998

    5 Schrag, "From Here To Equality Grading Policies For Egalitarians" 51 (51): 68-74, 2001

    6 Ennis, "Equality of Educational Opportunity" 3-18, 1976

    7 Rawls, "A Theory of Justice The Belknap Press of Harvard Univ" 1973

    8 Manchester, "A Report on Knowledge" Manchester Univ 1986

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-05-09 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Philosophy of Education KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.55 0.55 0.59
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.54 0.61 0.998 0.11
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼