RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    기호와 사물 그리고 존재 = 기호의 존재론적 의미

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76359085

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to fine the reality on relation between a sign and a object.
    The sign is not thing oneself, which substitutes what kind of thing except oneself outside. the sign has a materiality and a meaning and thinking, con ception and idea oneself are not a sign.
    Saussure defined a sign combination of the vocal image and concept.
    Finally, a sign combined signifier and signified.
    Saussure' semiology suggested that a sign represented a concept about reality and didnt represented reality oneself.
    On the other hand, Perice explained a sign composed of object, sign and interpretant.
    Perice emphasized the object oneself can be grasped by a sustained efforts and explore on the reality.
    But philosopher Kant explained thing itself could not be cognized.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to fine the reality on relation between a sign and a object. The sign is not thing oneself, which substitutes what kind of thing except oneself outside. the sign has a materiality and a meaning and thinking, con ception...

    The purpose of this study is to fine the reality on relation between a sign and a object.
    The sign is not thing oneself, which substitutes what kind of thing except oneself outside. the sign has a materiality and a meaning and thinking, con ception and idea oneself are not a sign.
    Saussure defined a sign combination of the vocal image and concept.
    Finally, a sign combined signifier and signified.
    Saussure' semiology suggested that a sign represented a concept about reality and didnt represented reality oneself.
    On the other hand, Perice explained a sign composed of object, sign and interpretant.
    Perice emphasized the object oneself can be grasped by a sustained efforts and explore on the reality.
    But philosopher Kant explained thing itself could not be cognized.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼