中韓農村土地制度比較硏究 : Comparative Study on The Rural Land System Between China and Korea

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Institution and institutional changes always act on the development of society and economics. 1n present China, the defects of rural farmland system obstruct the development of rural economics and society. So this dissertation mainly comparatively studies rural farmland system between China and other country. It is important to put forward new ideas for improving Chinese rural farmland system.
At introduction of this paper, the necessity to research on rural farmland system is brought forward and the basic research frame of this paper is established.
Based on past studies, in the second chapter the paper generalizes some concepts including institution, land, farmland system, institutional change etc. Moreover, it puts forward the characteristic of path-reliant about farmland institutional change and innovation.
The study in the third chapter mainly describes the process of Chinese rural farmland system and analyzes the present rural farmland system based on the "household contract responsibility system with remuneration linked to output"(HRS). At first, the paper in this chapter describes some main stages of Chinese rural farmland system, explaining what system makes for the increase in produce yield and farmer income so benefit to the improvement of productivity, and what system make against the improvement of productivity. Secondly, it analyzes the initiating and effect of HRS, and besides which mainly analyzes the defects of present rural farmland system. for example, the absent of main body in farmland ownership, the faultiness in establishment of farmland usufruct, the loss of farmland and other problems. In addition, in this chapter the rural farmland system in Taiwan also is studied.
In the fourth chapter the paper analyzes the rural farmland system of Korea from three points of farmland ownership system, farmland tenancy system and farmland preservation system. Based on the details of three kinds of system some experience used for reference by China is given. There is much in the establishment of Agricultural Infrastructure Corporation (AIC) and the perfect farmland preservation system that China can make use of. But China also must draw some lessons from Korea farmland ownership system. Because of its defect, the price of farmland and the cost of produce went up so that it made against international market competition of produce.
The rural farmland system of some other country is researched to the point in the fifth chapter. This section comparatively analyses the farmland system of Japan, Germany and France from three points of farmland ownership system, farmland tenancy system and farmland preservation system.
There are the conclusion and suggestion in the sixth chapter. The author thinks that only to establish distinct farmland ownership system can China construct perfect farmland protection system and farmland circulation system. On the base of synthesis to all kinds of views about farmland ownership system in the academe the author conceives that the farmland state-owned system could be fit for China. It can ensure that the farmer possesses complete usufruct to farmland in China. On the precondition of farmland ownership, the innovation train of thought about farmland protection system and farmland circulation system are brought forward.
Key words: Rural Farmland; Institutional Innovation; Farmland ownership system

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1 緖論 = 1
• 1.1 硏究比較農村土地制度的必要性 = 1
• 1.1.1 經濟增長與農村土地制度 = 1
• 1.1.2 中國現行農土地制度 = 2
• 1.1.3 韓國的行農土地制度及硏究比較農地制度的必要性 = 3
• 1.2 論文的硏究內容, 硏究광架及硏究特色 = 4
• 1.2.1 論文硏究的主要內容 = 4
• 1.2.2 論文的硏究광架 = 5
• 1.2.3 論文的硏究特色與創新 = 62
• 2 關于農村土地制度的幾個基本槪念 = 7
• 2.1 制度 = 7
• 2.1.1 制度的定義與特徵 = 7
• 2.1.2 制度的功能與分類 = 8
• 2.2 土地 = 8
• 2.2.1 土地的定義 = 8
• 2.2.2 土地的分類 = 9
• 2.3 土地制度與地農制度 = 10
• 2.3.1 土地制度的定義 = 10
• 2.3.2 土地制度的客觀性與規有效性性 = 11
• 2.3.3 土地制度的功能 = 11
• 2.4 土地制度的變遷和創新 = 12
• 3 中國農村土地制度的演變及現行制度的缺陷 = 14
• 3.1 中國農村土地制度的變遷過程 = 14
• 3.1.1 土地改革階段 = 14
• 3.1.2 農業互助組 = 15
• 3.1.3 初級合作社 = 16
• 3.1.4 高級合作社 = 18
• 3.1.5 人民公社 = 19
• 3.1.6 家庭承包制的騎勵史 = 22
• 3.2 土地家庭承包制 = 24
• 3.2.1 家庭承包制的發起 = 24
• 3.2.2 家庭承包制的運行成就 = 25
• 3.3 現行中國農村土地制度的缺陷 = 26
• 3.3.1 農村土地所有權主體虛位 = 26
• 3.3.2 農村土地使用權界定不嚴 = 27
• 3.3.3 農村土地流轉制度不完善 = 28
• 3.3.4 農村土地保護制度不完善 = 29
• 3.4 臺灣省的農地制度變遷 = 30
• 3.4.1 早期租佃制度的缺陷 = 30
• 3.4.2 減租制度的制定 = 31
• 3.4.3 減租制度的實行結果 = 32
• 3.4.4 減租制度的修正 = 33
• 4 韓國的農村土地制度分析 = 35
• 4.1 韓國農村土地制度的變遷與학立 = 35
• 4.1.1 農地改革之前的農地制度 = 35
• 4.1.2 農地改革的實施 = 36
• 4.1.3 農地租賃制的産生與有關制度 = 37
• 4.1.4 制定農地保護制度 = 40
• 4.1.5 開放的農業政策與農地制度 = 42
• 4.2 韓國農地所有制分析 = 44
• 4.2.1 農地所有制的基本狀況 = 44
• 4.2.2 對農地的處置與委託經營的限制 = 48
• 4.3 韓國農地利用與租賃制度分折 = 49
• 4.3.1 提高農地利用的制度與事業 = 49
• 4.3.2 農地租賃制度 = 55
• 4.4 韓國農地保護制度分析 = 60
• 4.4.1 農業振興地域的指定與運行 = 60
• 4.4.2 農地非農化許可制 = 62
• 4.4.3 對農地保護現狀及存左問題的調査 = 64
• 4.5 可供中國借監的地方 = 67
• 4.5.1 農地有有制度 = 67
• 4.5.2 農地利用與租賃制度 = 68
• 4.5.3 農地的保護制度 = 69
• 5 其他國家的農村土地制度槪況 = 70
• 5.1 農地所有制度 = 70
• 5.1.1 日本 = 70
• 5.1.2 德國 = 71
• 5.1.3 法國 = 72
• 5.2 農地利用與保護制度 = 73
• 5.2.1 日本 = 73
• 5.2.2 德國 = 74
• 5.2.3 法國 = 75
• 5.3 農地租賃制度 = 75
• 5.3.1 日本 = 75
• 5.3.2 德國 = 76
• 5.3.3 法國 = 77
• 6 對中國農村土地制度創新的思路與探索 = 78
• 6.1 農村土地所有制 = 78
• 6.1.1 農村土地私有制 = 78
• 6.1.2 農村土地集體所有制 = 80
• 6.1.3 農村土地國有化 = 81
• 6.2 農村土地流轉制度 = 84
• 6.2.1 農村地土流轉制度的回顧 = 84
• 6.2.2 建立完善的土地流轉制度 = 85
• 6.3 農地保護制度 = 85
• 6.3.1 農地轉用制度的回顧 = 85
• 6.3.2 關于基本農田保護制 = 88
• 6.4 建立合理農材土地制度的思考 = 89
• 參考文默
• 致謝