RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      세이프가드협정상의 국내산업 범위에 대한 해석 = Interpretation of Domestic Industry under Safeguard Agreement

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104168536

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This paper discusses the definition of the term "domestic industry" in relation to the application of the safeguards provisions of the WTO through the judicial interpretation made by the WTO Appellate Body and panel. The requirements for the imposition of safeguards include a rapid increase in import quantity, the existence of serious injury or threat of serious injury to the domestic industry, and a causal relationship between the increase in imports and the industrial injury. The domestic industry refers to the producers that account for a considerable portion of the total national production , or the national producers who produce articles "like" or "directly competitive" with the specific imports. Chronically, there have been controversial disputes relating to the interpretation of the term "like" or "directly competitive". Reviewing the disputes relating to the term "domestic industry" in application of the safeguards provisions since the establishment of the WTO, the interpretation of the term "like" has been made imposing weight on the physical characteristics of the products. This interpretation is in contrast with that of the interpretation of the term "directly competitive" which has been interpreted with imposed weight on the commercial elasticity of substitution which can be measured by the final use or consumer's taste.
      번역하기

      This paper discusses the definition of the term "domestic industry" in relation to the application of the safeguards provisions of the WTO through the judicial interpretation made by the WTO Appellate Body and panel. The requirements for the impositio...

      This paper discusses the definition of the term "domestic industry" in relation to the application of the safeguards provisions of the WTO through the judicial interpretation made by the WTO Appellate Body and panel. The requirements for the imposition of safeguards include a rapid increase in import quantity, the existence of serious injury or threat of serious injury to the domestic industry, and a causal relationship between the increase in imports and the industrial injury. The domestic industry refers to the producers that account for a considerable portion of the total national production , or the national producers who produce articles "like" or "directly competitive" with the specific imports. Chronically, there have been controversial disputes relating to the interpretation of the term "like" or "directly competitive". Reviewing the disputes relating to the term "domestic industry" in application of the safeguards provisions since the establishment of the WTO, the interpretation of the term "like" has been made imposing weight on the physical characteristics of the products. This interpretation is in contrast with that of the interpretation of the term "directly competitive" which has been interpreted with imposed weight on the commercial elasticity of substitution which can be measured by the final use or consumer's taste.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Jackson, John H, "World Trade and the Law of GATT1969"

      2 Clough, Mark, "Who and EC Safeguard Measures-Legal Standards and Jurisprudence" 9 (9): 2003

      3 Clubb, B. E, "United States Foreign Trade Law" Brown and Company 1 121. 2 163 ff. :

      4 Sykes, Alan O, "The persistent Puzzles of Safeguard: Lesson from the Steel Dispute" 2004.September

      5 Jackson, John H, "The World Trade System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations , 2nd ed." 1997

      6 Sykes, Alan O, "The Safeguards Mess: A Critique of WTO Jurisprudence" University of Chicago Law School (187) : 2003.5

      7 Pauwelyn, Joost, "The Puzzle of WTO Safeguard and Regional Trade Agreement,Journal of International Economic Law" 2004.3

      8 Pauwelyn, Joost, "The Puzzle of WTO Safeguard and Regional Trade Agreement" 2004.3

      9 Lee, Eun Sup, "Korean Version of Uruguay Round Agreement on Safeguards" Michigan State University 1999Summer

      10 Ledet, Christy, "Causation of Injury in Safeguard Cases: Why the U.S. Can't Win" 2003Spring

      1 Jackson, John H, "World Trade and the Law of GATT1969"

      2 Clough, Mark, "Who and EC Safeguard Measures-Legal Standards and Jurisprudence" 9 (9): 2003

      3 Clubb, B. E, "United States Foreign Trade Law" Brown and Company 1 121. 2 163 ff. :

      4 Sykes, Alan O, "The persistent Puzzles of Safeguard: Lesson from the Steel Dispute" 2004.September

      5 Jackson, John H, "The World Trade System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations , 2nd ed." 1997

      6 Sykes, Alan O, "The Safeguards Mess: A Critique of WTO Jurisprudence" University of Chicago Law School (187) : 2003.5

      7 Pauwelyn, Joost, "The Puzzle of WTO Safeguard and Regional Trade Agreement,Journal of International Economic Law" 2004.3

      8 Pauwelyn, Joost, "The Puzzle of WTO Safeguard and Regional Trade Agreement" 2004.3

      9 Lee, Eun Sup, "Korean Version of Uruguay Round Agreement on Safeguards" Michigan State University 1999Summer

      10 Ledet, Christy, "Causation of Injury in Safeguard Cases: Why the U.S. Can't Win" 2003Spring

      11 Kaye, Harvey, "7A International Trade Practice" 2002

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-03-30 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Global Commerce And Cyber Trade -> International Commerce and Information Review KCI등재
      2007-03-13 학회명변경 영문명 : Korea Association For Global Commerce And Cyber Trade -> Korea Association for International Commerce and Information KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.04 1.04 1
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.99 1.02 1.213 0.33
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼