RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Hybridizing Justice: Cultural Legitimacy and the Limits of Traditional Dispute Resolution in Lanao del Sur, the Philippines = Hybridizing Justice: Cultural Legitimacy and the Limits of Traditional Dispute Resolution in Lanao del Sur, the Philippines

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110048687

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This article examines how communities in Lanao del Sur, the Philippines, perceive the role of traditional dispute resolution (TDR) actors in resolving rido (clan-based conflict). Using a mixed-methods approach, the study assesses the frequency of engagement, perceived effectiveness, and level of community trust in various actors, including executive heads of local government units, traditional leaders, religious leaders, Moro Islamic Liberation Front combatants, and members of the security sector. Findings reveal that while TDR is widely trusted and accessible, it risks both being captured by and excluding the elite. The article proposes a hybrid dispute resolution framework that combines cultural legitimacy with institutional safeguards, advancing debates on post-conflict justice in legally plural societies. In doing so, it highlights the potential for hybrid mechanisms to foster more inclusive, accountable, and sustainable peacebuilding.
      번역하기

      This article examines how communities in Lanao del Sur, the Philippines, perceive the role of traditional dispute resolution (TDR) actors in resolving rido (clan-based conflict). Using a mixed-methods approach, the study assesses the frequency of enga...

      This article examines how communities in Lanao del Sur, the Philippines, perceive the role of traditional dispute resolution (TDR) actors in resolving rido (clan-based conflict). Using a mixed-methods approach, the study assesses the frequency of engagement, perceived effectiveness, and level of community trust in various actors, including executive heads of local government units, traditional leaders, religious leaders, Moro Islamic Liberation Front combatants, and members of the security sector. Findings reveal that while TDR is widely trusted and accessible, it risks both being captured by and excluding the elite. The article proposes a hybrid dispute resolution framework that combines cultural legitimacy with institutional safeguards, advancing debates on post-conflict justice in legally plural societies. In doing so, it highlights the potential for hybrid mechanisms to foster more inclusive, accountable, and sustainable peacebuilding.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼