교정력 부하시기에 따른 교정용 미니 임플란트의 안정성 = The effect of loading time on the stability of mini-implant

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 미니 임플란트 식립 후 교정력 부하시기와 관련하여 임플란트 주위골의 치유과정을 조사하였다. 성견8마리의 하악 협측골에 교정용 미니 임플란트(ORLUS, Ortholution CO, Korea) 48개를 식립한 후 교정력을 주지 않은 대조군과 식립 후 즉시 교정력을 준 즉시 부하군, 그리고 식립 후 3주간의 치유기간을 두고 교정력을 준 지연 부하군으로 나누어 각각의 군에 대해 3주, 6주, 12주가 경과된 시점에 임플란트 주위골의 변화를 조직 계측학적으로 관찰하였다. 골 접촉률은 즉시 부하군에서 시기에 따른 유의한 변화가 없었으며 지연 부하군은 3주에 비해 12주에서 유의하게 증가하였다 (p ＜ 0.05). 각 시점에서 군 간의 골 접촉률을 비교했을 때 12주째 지연 부하군이 즉시 부하군보다 유의하게 높았다 (p ＜ 0.05). 골 면적비율은 즉시 부하군의 경우, 시기에 따른 유의한 변화가 없었으며, 지연 부하군과 대조군은 6주에 비해 12주째 유의한 증가를 보였으며 (p ＜ 0.05), 12주째 실험군 간에 유의한 차이는 관찰되지 않았다 (p ＞ 0.05). 동요도는 12주째 즉시 부하군과 지연 부하군 간에 유의한 차이는 없었다 (p ＞ 0.05). 위의 결과에서 즉시 부하가 self drilling형 미니 임플란트 주위골의 안정성에 부정적인 영향을 주지 않았으므로 식립 즉시 교정력을 부여하여 사용하는 데 임상적으로 문제가 없을 것으로 판단된다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the stability of mini-implants in relation to loading time. Methods: A total of 48 mini-implants (ORLUS, Ortholution, Korea) were placed into the buccal alveolar bone of the mandible in 8 male beagle dogs. Orthodontic force (200 - 250 gm) was applied immediately for the immediate loading group while force application was delayed for 3 weeks in the delayed loading group. For the subsequent loading periods (3, 6, 12 weeks), BIC (bone implant contact) and BV/TV (bone volume/total volume) and mobility test were carried out. Results: The immediate loading group showed no changes in BIC from 3 to 12 weeks, while the delayed loading group showed a significant increase in BIC between 3 and 12 weeks (p ＜ 0.05). The BV/TV of the delayed loading group significantly increased from 6 to 12 weeks of loading (p ＜ 0.05), while the BV/TV of the immediate loading group decreased from 3 to 12 weeks of loading. However, there was no significant difference in BV/TV between experimental groups. The mobility of the immediate loading group was not significantly different from that of the delayed loading group after 12 weeks of loading (p ＜ 0.05). Conclusions: These results showed that immediate loading does not have a negative effect on the stability of mini-implants compared to the early loading method in both the clinical and histomorphometric point of view.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Deguchi T, "The use of small titanium screws for orthodontic anchorage" 82 : 377-381, 2003

2 Lee JS, "The efficient use of midpalatal miniscrew implants" 74 : 711-714, 2004

3 Schulte W, "The Periotest method" 42 : 433-440, 1992

4 Gray JB, "Studies on the efficacy of implants as orthodontic anchorage" 83 : 311-317, 1983

5 Kim HJ, "Soft-tissue and cortical-bone thickness at orthodontic implant sites" 130 : 177-182, 2006

6 Roberts WE, "Rigid implant anchorage to close a mandibular first molar extraction site" 28 : 693-704, 1994

7 Roberts WE, "Rigid endosseous implants for orthodontic and orthopedic anchorage" 59 : 247-256, 1989

8 Akin-Nergiz N, "Reactions of peri-implant tissues to continuous loading of osseointegrated implants" 114 : 292-298, 1998

9 Frost HM, "Perspectives: bone's mechanical usage windows" 19 : 257-271, 1992

10 Oyonarte R, "Peri-implant bone response to orthodontic loading: Part 2. Implant surface geometry and its effect on regional bone remodeling" 128 : 182-189, 2005

11 Turley PK, "Orthodontic force application to titanium endosseous implants" 58 : 151-162, 1988

12 Isidor F, "Mobility assessment with the Periotest system in relation to histologic findings of oral implants" 13 : 377-383, 1998

13 Kyung SH, "Miniscrew anchorage used to protract lower second molars into first molar extraction sites" 37 : 575-579, 2003

14 Park HS, "Micro-implant anchorage for treatment of skeletal Class I bialveolar protrusion" 35 : 417-422, 2001

15 Tricio J, "Mechanical state assessment of the implant-bone continuum: a better understanding of the Periotest method" 10 : 43-49, 1995

16 Mori S, "Increased intracortical remodeling following fatigue damage" 14 : 103-109, 1993

17 Melsen B, "Immediate loading of implants used for orthodontic anchorage" 3 : 23-28, 2000

18 Kim JW, "Histomorphometric and mechanical analyses of the drill-free screw as orthodontic anchorage" 128 : 190-194, 2005

19 Freire JN, "Histomorphologic and histomophometric evaluation of immediately and early loaded mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage" 131 : 704-, 2007

20 Park HS, "Histologic and biomechanical characteristics of orthodontic self-drilling and self-tapping microscrew implants" 36 : 295-397, 2006

21 Park HS, "Group distal movement of teeth using microscrew implant anchorage" 75 : 602-609, 2005

22 Roth A, "Forced eruption with microscrew anchorage for preprosthetic leveling of the gingival margin" 65 : 513-519, 2004

23 Miyawaki S, "Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage" 124 : 373-378, 2003

24 Park HS, "Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage" 130 : 18-25, 2006

25 Wehrbein H, "Endosseous titanium implants during and after orthodontic load--an experimental study in the dog" 4 : 76-82, 1993

26 Kyung SH, "Bonding orthodontic attachments to miniscrew heads" 39 : 348-353, 2005

27 Cheng SJ, "A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage" 19 : 100-106, 2004

28 Trisi P, "A histometric comparison of smooth and rough titanium implants in human low-density jawbone" 14 : 689-698, 1999

29 Kanomi R, "-implant for orthodontic anchorage" 31 : 763-767, 1997