점유취득시효 완성자의 대상 청구권

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

A claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property provide the clause 281 in section 1 of the German Civil Act and the clause 1303 of the France Civil Act. but claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription of real
property don't provide in the Korean Civil ct. therefore, whether or not claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property admit, the dispute exist. But, the admit of claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription of real
property in interpretation are the large number view and the Supreme Court view on the ground that the reversion to the authentic rightful person of the property worth of the self-not reversion was based on the fairness principles flowing the whole civil act. but I doubt the propriety of admit for the claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property in not only the effect of the fulfillmentimpossible but also the effect of the completion of the acquisitive prescription by Supreme Court.
For claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property provide, the fulfillment of debt have to be impossible post factum because the existence of the credit and the debt between the parties was premised. but I have a doubt for the whether or
not the credit and the debt in the parties exist in the acquisitive prescription of real property.
Therefore, in thesis, I try to study the propriety of admit for the claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription ofreal property by Supreme Court.
In studying these problems, first, I try to study the general theory of claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property, next, I try to study the legal position of the possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property. last, I try to study the supreme court attitude for the admit of claim to compensation in substitutes by possessor's acquisitive prescription of real property.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 대상청구권의 개념
• 1. 의의
• 2. 인정 근거
• 3. 법적 성질
• 4. 인정요건
• 5. 내용
• Ⅲ. 점유취득시효완성자의 대상 청구권
• 1. 점유취득시효완성자의 법적지위
• 2. 취득시효 완성자의 대상 청구권
• Ⅳ. 결론
• 참고문헌
• ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 곽윤직, "채권총론" 박영사 1992

2 이태재, "채권총론" 1981

3 안법영, "채권적 대상청구권 in 김형배 교수 화갑기념논문" 박영사 1994

4 지원림, "점유취득시효완성이후의 사정변경과 대상청구권" 박영사 18 :

5 문흥수, "점유취득시효 완성후의 시효취득자, 소유명의자, 제3취득자 상호간의 관계" 1996

6 지원림, "점유취득시효 완성 이후의 사정변경과? 대상청구권" 박영사 18 : 1996

7 송덕수, "이행불능에 있어서 이른바 대상청구권" 4 :

8 윤홍철, "이행불능에 있어서 대상청구권" 1991

9 이은애, "우리 민법상의 이른바 대상청구권의 인정" 법원도서관 26 : 1995

10 양창수, "민법주해 1X(채권2)" 박영사 1995

11 양창수, "매매목적토지의 수용과 보상금에 대한 대상청구권" 1993

12 최병조, "로마법 ? 민법논고" 박영사 1999

13 제헌웅, "대상청구권의 적용범위" 청림출판사 4 : 1999

14 송덕수, "대상청구권의 인정범위와 내용 in 판례실무연구(1)" 박영사 1997

15 "대상청구권에 대한 입법론적 고찰" 22 :

16 최병조, "대상청구권에 관한 소고 in 판례실무연구(1)" 박영사

17 이상경, "대상청구권, in 민사재판의 제문제(상)(송천? 이시윤박사회갑기념논문집)" 박영사 1995

18 지원림, "대상청구권 in 민법학논총 제2권(후암 곽윤직선생 고희기념논문집)" 박영사 1995

19 송덕수, "대상청구권" 박영사 16 : 1994

20 김성용, "대상 청구권의 발생요건" 8 :

21 현승종, "게르만법" 박영사 1994