RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Comparative Analysis of Tools for Evaluation and Monitoring of Smart Cities in the Philippines

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T16840910

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Urbanization in the Philippines presents numerous challenges, including city congestion, degradation of air and water quality, inadequate solid waste management, housing shortages, safety concerns, and the exacerbation of inequality and poverty. The ‘smart city’ concept aims to address these issues through the utilization of information and communications technology and data analysis. However, the Philippines lacks a comprehensive smart city framework that can effectively guide and harmonize the adoption and implementation of smart city initiatives by various stakeholders. The study provides a clearer understanding of the smart city concept for the Philippines by comparing and evaluating the tools used by other cities in developing their smart city. The study utilized the survey method to gather information from 105 local government personnel of three representative smart cities in the Philippines which determined the level of acceptance of the smart city domains, the smart city dimension to be prioritized, and the specific challenges to be focused on for each respective city. The findings emphasized the importance of focusing on improving educational systems, enhancing public participation and community empowerment, promoting social interaction and integration, strengthening solid waste management, capitalizing on innovation for economic recovery, optimizing transportation infrastructure, enhancing e-government systems and cybersecurity, and improving safety and security measures. These results can serve as reference in the formulation of the country’s own smart city framework and help cities understand their position with respect to other cities while also providing policymakers an opportunity to identify areas for improvement while leveraging areas of strength.
      번역하기

      Urbanization in the Philippines presents numerous challenges, including city congestion, degradation of air and water quality, inadequate solid waste management, housing shortages, safety concerns, and the exacerbation of inequality and poverty. The ...

      Urbanization in the Philippines presents numerous challenges, including city congestion, degradation of air and water quality, inadequate solid waste management, housing shortages, safety concerns, and the exacerbation of inequality and poverty. The ‘smart city’ concept aims to address these issues through the utilization of information and communications technology and data analysis. However, the Philippines lacks a comprehensive smart city framework that can effectively guide and harmonize the adoption and implementation of smart city initiatives by various stakeholders. The study provides a clearer understanding of the smart city concept for the Philippines by comparing and evaluating the tools used by other cities in developing their smart city. The study utilized the survey method to gather information from 105 local government personnel of three representative smart cities in the Philippines which determined the level of acceptance of the smart city domains, the smart city dimension to be prioritized, and the specific challenges to be focused on for each respective city. The findings emphasized the importance of focusing on improving educational systems, enhancing public participation and community empowerment, promoting social interaction and integration, strengthening solid waste management, capitalizing on innovation for economic recovery, optimizing transportation infrastructure, enhancing e-government systems and cybersecurity, and improving safety and security measures. These results can serve as reference in the formulation of the country’s own smart city framework and help cities understand their position with respect to other cities while also providing policymakers an opportunity to identify areas for improvement while leveraging areas of strength.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • List of Figures iii
      • List of Tables iv
      • Abstract v
      • Chapter 1: Introduction 1
      • 1.1. Statement of the Problem and Research Questions 2
      • List of Figures iii
      • List of Tables iv
      • Abstract v
      • Chapter 1: Introduction 1
      • 1.1. Statement of the Problem and Research Questions 2
      • 1.2. Objectives of the Study 3
      • 1.3. Significance of the Study 3
      • 1.4. Methodology, Scope, and Limitation of the Study 3
      • 1.5. Thesis Structure 4
      • Chapter 2: Literature Review 5
      • 2.1. Smart City Definition 5
      • 2.2. Smart City Domains 7
      • 2.2.1. Smart Economy 8
      • 2.2.2. Smart Living 9
      • 2.2.3. Smart Environment 10
      • 2.2.4. Smart People 11
      • 2.2.5. Smart Governance 12
      • 2.2.6. Smart Mobility 12
      • 2.2.7. Smart Digital Infrastructure 13
      • 2.3. Smart City Frameworks: Case Studies of Barcelona, Seoul, and Copenhagen 14
      • 2.3.1 Barcelona, Spain 15
      • 2.3.2 Seoul, South Korea 16
      • 2.3.3 Copenhagen, Denmark 17
      • 2.4. Evaluation of Smart Cities 18
      • 2.5. Smart City Framework 22
      • Chapter 3: Methodology 25
      • 3.1. Research Design 25
      • 3.2. Selection of Smart Cities in the Philippines 25
      • 3.2. Respondents of the Study 27
      • 3.3. Research Sampling/Methods of Gathering Data 27
      • 3.4. Reliability and Validity of the Research Instruments 28
      • 3.5. Data Analysis 28
      • Chapter 4: Results of Analysis and Discussion 29
      • 4.1. Survey Results 29
      • 4.1.1. Respondents’ Level of Acceptance on Smart City Domains 29
      • 4.1.2. Priority Domains 37
      • 4.1.3. Challenges Identified 39
      • Chapter 5: Conclusions and Recommendations 41
      • 5.1. Level of Acceptance 41
      • 5.2. Priority Smart City Domains 41
      • References 44
      • Appendix: Survey Questionnaire 52
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼