- 1. 연구의 목적
- 2. 문헌 연구 및 연구 문제의 도출
- 3. 연구 방법
- 4. 분석 결과
- 5. 뉴스 프레임의 변화

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76333329
2006
Korean
식품 위해 ; 위해 보도 ; 위해 커뮤니케이션 ; 김치 파동 ; 뉴스 프레임 ; Food Risk ; Risk Reporting ; Risk Communication ; Food Accident ; News Frame
070
KCI등재
학술저널
260-305(46쪽)
40
0
상세조회0
다운로드목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 "while the frames at the beginning emphasized reactions of the consumers to the incident the emphases of frames changed to economic consequences of the incident trade dispute between Korea and China This reveals that the frames did not emphasize the close examination of the factors that caused the incident"
2 "the Kimchie incident stories were more likely to be presented through episodic frame rather than thematic frame While episodic frame stories merely provided the facts of the incident and focused on the reaction of related bodies of the incident thematic frame stories focused more likely on the impacts of the incident"
3 "food related government agencies and organizations were essential news sources for the Kimchie stories and the number of news sources for a news story were less than two they were most negatively described in the news stories"
4 "The present study provides implications regarding the role of mass media as well as the food industry and government in managing food risk incidents as risk communicators"
5 "The present study examined the food risk news coverage in the context of risk communication A frame analysis was performed for the reports on the Kimchie risk in 2005 which was one of the notorious food risk incidents ways of presenting news stories and the frames utilized for different themes a total of 390 news stories on the Kimchie incident was collected and analyzed The major findings are as follows"
1 "while the frames at the beginning emphasized reactions of the consumers to the incident the emphases of frames changed to economic consequences of the incident trade dispute between Korea and China This reveals that the frames did not emphasize the close examination of the factors that caused the incident"
2 "the Kimchie incident stories were more likely to be presented through episodic frame rather than thematic frame While episodic frame stories merely provided the facts of the incident and focused on the reaction of related bodies of the incident thematic frame stories focused more likely on the impacts of the incident"
3 "food related government agencies and organizations were essential news sources for the Kimchie stories and the number of news sources for a news story were less than two they were most negatively described in the news stories"
4 "The present study provides implications regarding the role of mass media as well as the food industry and government in managing food risk incidents as risk communicators"
5 "The present study examined the food risk news coverage in the context of risk communication A frame analysis was performed for the reports on the Kimchie risk in 2005 which was one of the notorious food risk incidents ways of presenting news stories and the frames utilized for different themes a total of 390 news stories on the Kimchie incident was collected and analyzed The major findings are as follows"
폭력 영상물 둔감화(desensitization)에 대한 실험연구
아시아지역의 해외채널 편성 현황과 미디어 사업자 변인과의 관계성 연구
‘이해찬 전 총리의 골프파문 사태’ 보도와 수용자 인식에 관한 연구
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 평가 | 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지) | |
| 2018-01-01 | 등재 | 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | |
| 2015-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2011-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2006-02-08 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Broadcasting -> Korean Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies | ![]() |
| 2005-04-11 | 학회명변경 | 영문명 : Korean Association Of Broadcasting Studies -> Korean Association for Broadcasting & Telecommunication Studies | ![]() |
| 2004-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2002-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 1998-07-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.44 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 1.49 | 1.68 | 1.972 | 0.72 |
로그인하고 관련된 다양한 학술자료를 확인해 보세요.
로그인