RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      토지환경 및 자연생태환경을 고려한 환경영향평가 협의결정 개선방안 = Environmental Impact Assessment Consultation Based on Land Environment and Natural & Ecological Environ

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106594410

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      국문 초록 (Abstract)

      과거에는 대기오염, 수질오염, 폐기물 등이 환경영향평가에서 주요한 평가항목이었는데 최근에는 토지환경(토지이용, 지형), 자연생태환경(동·식물상, 자연환경자산), 사회·경제 환경 등이 주요한 평가항목 으로 다뤄지고 있다. 2012년 이후 전략환경영향평가와 소규모환경영향평가의 협의결과를 보면, 90 %이상이 조건부동의였다. 그 러나 환경영향평가의 협의결과는 2012년∼2016년 기간 거의 대부분(94.1 %) 동의였으나, 환경정책기조가 바뀌는 2017년 이후부터 대부분(87.4 %) 조건부동의로 결정되었다. 그리고 세 종류 환경영향평가의 부동의 비율이 2013년∼2016년 기간 0.3∼0.6 % 밖에 되지 않았는데, 2017년∼2019년 기간 1.3∼3.1 %로 급증하 였다. 그 사이 협의 결과에 영향을 미칠만한 제도나 분석기법의 변화가 없었다면, 협의결과의 일관성 및 공 정성의 결여가 문제로 제기될 수 있다. 따라서 환경영향평가에서 입지타당성을 결정하는 토지이용, 동·식물 상 및 자연환경자산, 사회·경제 등의 평가항목에 대한 지표개발과 적용에 대한 연구가 요구되고 있다. 본 연구는 환경영향평가가 전략환경영향평가, 환경영향평가, 소규모환경영향평가로 구분되어 시행되는 2012년 이후 동의, 조건부동의, 부동의 협의결과를 분석한다. 부동의 사례에 대해 6개 환경분야 중 입지타 당성분석에서 중요한 토지환경과 자연생태환경의 평가항목을 중심으로 근거요인을 분석하고, 환경관련 토 지이용규제와 환경관련 등급을 중심으로 개발계획이나 개발사업에 대한 환경영향평가에서 협의 결정의 개 선방안을 모색한다.
      번역하기

      과거에는 대기오염, 수질오염, 폐기물 등이 환경영향평가에서 주요한 평가항목이었는데 최근에는 토지환경(토지이용, 지형), 자연생태환경(동·식물상, 자연환경자산), �...

      과거에는 대기오염, 수질오염, 폐기물 등이 환경영향평가에서 주요한 평가항목이었는데 최근에는 토지환경(토지이용, 지형), 자연생태환경(동·식물상, 자연환경자산), 사회·경제 환경 등이 주요한 평가항목 으로 다뤄지고 있다. 2012년 이후 전략환경영향평가와 소규모환경영향평가의 협의결과를 보면, 90 %이상이 조건부동의였다. 그 러나 환경영향평가의 협의결과는 2012년∼2016년 기간 거의 대부분(94.1 %) 동의였으나, 환경정책기조가 바뀌는 2017년 이후부터 대부분(87.4 %) 조건부동의로 결정되었다. 그리고 세 종류 환경영향평가의 부동의 비율이 2013년∼2016년 기간 0.3∼0.6 % 밖에 되지 않았는데, 2017년∼2019년 기간 1.3∼3.1 %로 급증하 였다. 그 사이 협의 결과에 영향을 미칠만한 제도나 분석기법의 변화가 없었다면, 협의결과의 일관성 및 공 정성의 결여가 문제로 제기될 수 있다. 따라서 환경영향평가에서 입지타당성을 결정하는 토지이용, 동·식물 상 및 자연환경자산, 사회·경제 등의 평가항목에 대한 지표개발과 적용에 대한 연구가 요구되고 있다. 본 연구는 환경영향평가가 전략환경영향평가, 환경영향평가, 소규모환경영향평가로 구분되어 시행되는 2012년 이후 동의, 조건부동의, 부동의 협의결과를 분석한다. 부동의 사례에 대해 6개 환경분야 중 입지타 당성분석에서 중요한 토지환경과 자연생태환경의 평가항목을 중심으로 근거요인을 분석하고, 환경관련 토 지이용규제와 환경관련 등급을 중심으로 개발계획이나 개발사업에 대한 환경영향평가에서 협의 결정의 개 선방안을 모색한다.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In the past, air pollution, water pollution and solid waste were very important items, but at present environmentally sound land use, ecosystem conservation and sustainable socio-economy have become very important in EIA. According to the consultation result of SEA and Small scale EIA during 2012∼2019, most results are ‘Conditional Agreement’. Especially EIA consultation results before 2016 were mostly (94.1 %) ‘Agreement’, but since 2017 most (87.4 %) are ‘Conditional Agreement’. And the percentage of ‘Non Agreement’ have sharply increased from 0.3~0.6 % (during 2013~2016) to 1.3~3.1 % (during 2017~2019). In case there have been no change in EIA system and consultation techniques, the problems of inconsistency and unfairness could be raised. Therefore are urgently required researches on environmentally sound land use, ecosystem conservation and sustainable socioeconomy which decide location feasibility assessment. The purpose of this study is to analyse the consultation cases of SEA, EIA, and Small scale EIA since 2012, and to identify key factors which result in the decision of nonagreement of development plans and development projects, and to suggest the improvements on EIA consultation based on land use regulation and environmental grade.
      번역하기

      In the past, air pollution, water pollution and solid waste were very important items, but at present environmentally sound land use, ecosystem conservation and sustainable socio-economy have become very important in EIA. According to the consultation...

      In the past, air pollution, water pollution and solid waste were very important items, but at present environmentally sound land use, ecosystem conservation and sustainable socio-economy have become very important in EIA. According to the consultation result of SEA and Small scale EIA during 2012∼2019, most results are ‘Conditional Agreement’. Especially EIA consultation results before 2016 were mostly (94.1 %) ‘Agreement’, but since 2017 most (87.4 %) are ‘Conditional Agreement’. And the percentage of ‘Non Agreement’ have sharply increased from 0.3~0.6 % (during 2013~2016) to 1.3~3.1 % (during 2017~2019). In case there have been no change in EIA system and consultation techniques, the problems of inconsistency and unfairness could be raised. Therefore are urgently required researches on environmentally sound land use, ecosystem conservation and sustainable socioeconomy which decide location feasibility assessment. The purpose of this study is to analyse the consultation cases of SEA, EIA, and Small scale EIA since 2012, and to identify key factors which result in the decision of nonagreement of development plans and development projects, and to suggest the improvements on EIA consultation based on land use regulation and environmental grade.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이종호, "통합환경관리와 환경영향평가" 한국지적정보학회 20 (20): 89-103, 2018

      2 이종호, "수질보전을 위한 입지규제의 개선방안" 한국지적정보학회 18 (18): 71-86, 2016

      3 Kim TH, "Study on the Policy of Planning Location for Solar and Wind Power Facilities while Considering Social and Environmental Impacts" Korea Environment Institute 2018

      4 Ministry of Environment., "Strategic Environmental Assessment Manual"

      5 이종호, "Social Impact Assessment on National Development Projects in Korea" 한국환경영향평가학회 19 (19): 197-204, 2010

      6 Ministry of Environment, "Query and Reply Casebook on Environmental Impact Assessment etc"

      7 "National Land Environmental Information System"

      8 Lee JH, "National Development Projects originated from the Presidential Campaign Pledges and Impact Assessment" Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University 49 : 123-141, 2010

      9 Kwon YH, "Indicator Development for Policy-level Plan SEA" Korea Environment Institute 2014

      10 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, "Guide on National Land Planning Assessment"

      1 이종호, "통합환경관리와 환경영향평가" 한국지적정보학회 20 (20): 89-103, 2018

      2 이종호, "수질보전을 위한 입지규제의 개선방안" 한국지적정보학회 18 (18): 71-86, 2016

      3 Kim TH, "Study on the Policy of Planning Location for Solar and Wind Power Facilities while Considering Social and Environmental Impacts" Korea Environment Institute 2018

      4 Ministry of Environment., "Strategic Environmental Assessment Manual"

      5 이종호, "Social Impact Assessment on National Development Projects in Korea" 한국환경영향평가학회 19 (19): 197-204, 2010

      6 Ministry of Environment, "Query and Reply Casebook on Environmental Impact Assessment etc"

      7 "National Land Environmental Information System"

      8 Lee JH, "National Development Projects originated from the Presidential Campaign Pledges and Impact Assessment" Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University 49 : 123-141, 2010

      9 Kwon YH, "Indicator Development for Policy-level Plan SEA" Korea Environment Institute 2014

      10 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, "Guide on National Land Planning Assessment"

      11 "Environmental Space Information Service"

      12 Ministry of Environment, "Environmental Nonagreement Consultation Cases"

      13 Ministry of Environment, "Environmental Location Consulting System Operating Guide"

      14 Lee SB, "Environmental Impact and Location Guideline of Wind Power Facilities" Korea Environment Institute 2019

      15 "Environmental Impact Assessment Support System"

      16 Lee JH, "Environmental Impact Assessment" Dongwha Technology Pub. Co 2016

      17 Ministry of Environment, "Environmental Assessment Consulting Guide on Solar Power Facilities on Water"

      18 Ministry of Environment, "Environmental Assessment Consulting Guide on Solar Power Facilities on Land"

      19 Geum River Basin Environmental Office, "2.0Query and Reply Casebook"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.59 0.59 0.47
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.47 0.43 0.599 0.2
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼