RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      OECD 디지털세의 필라1 및 2 도입에 따른 국내기업의 효과와 시사점 = Effect and Implications of Domestic Companies in the Adoption of Pillar1 and 2 of the OECD Digital Tax

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108536374

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The OECD/G20 reached a final agreement on the core content of Pillar1 on October 8, 2021. However, no clear analysis results have been reported yet on the impact on Korean companies based on this final agreement. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze the changes in tax burden with target companies among Korean companies based on this final agreement.
      The analysis results of this study are as follows. First, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK Hynix Co., Ltd. are analyzed as companies to which Pillar1 of the final agreement was applied (more than 20 billion euros and a gross-profit margin of more than 10%) among Korean companies. The global profits of these companies are 47.4 trillion won and 6.4 trillion won, respectively, and corporate tax expenses are about 9.9 trillion won and 1.4 trillion won, respectively. Gross profit margins are 23.70% and 33.89%, respectively, and operating margins are 15.2% and 15.71%, respectively, exceeding 10% in terms of operating margin. Second, the change in additional tax burden for Pillar1 is analyzed through various assumptions, but it is analyzed that there is no additional tax burden for both Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix due to this final agreement.
      This study suggests the following policy implications. First, it is necessary to prepare countermeasures at the national level according to a management strategy that lowers the profit rate of companies presumed to be applicable. Second, there are uncertainties in the current agreement, and a more certain strategy is needed in future negotiations. Third, efforts to minimize tax payment cooperation costs are needed. The premise is that global companies’ global sales and profit structure by country must be fully understood through perfect information sharing among tax authorities.
      The results of this study are expected to be able to provide policy implications for current policy makers and researchers to suggest how much the digital tax introduction will affect domestic companies.
      번역하기

      The OECD/G20 reached a final agreement on the core content of Pillar1 on October 8, 2021. However, no clear analysis results have been reported yet on the impact on Korean companies based on this final agreement. Therefore, the purpose of this study i...

      The OECD/G20 reached a final agreement on the core content of Pillar1 on October 8, 2021. However, no clear analysis results have been reported yet on the impact on Korean companies based on this final agreement. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze the changes in tax burden with target companies among Korean companies based on this final agreement.
      The analysis results of this study are as follows. First, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK Hynix Co., Ltd. are analyzed as companies to which Pillar1 of the final agreement was applied (more than 20 billion euros and a gross-profit margin of more than 10%) among Korean companies. The global profits of these companies are 47.4 trillion won and 6.4 trillion won, respectively, and corporate tax expenses are about 9.9 trillion won and 1.4 trillion won, respectively. Gross profit margins are 23.70% and 33.89%, respectively, and operating margins are 15.2% and 15.71%, respectively, exceeding 10% in terms of operating margin. Second, the change in additional tax burden for Pillar1 is analyzed through various assumptions, but it is analyzed that there is no additional tax burden for both Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix due to this final agreement.
      This study suggests the following policy implications. First, it is necessary to prepare countermeasures at the national level according to a management strategy that lowers the profit rate of companies presumed to be applicable. Second, there are uncertainties in the current agreement, and a more certain strategy is needed in future negotiations. Third, efforts to minimize tax payment cooperation costs are needed. The premise is that global companies’ global sales and profit structure by country must be fully understood through perfect information sharing among tax authorities.
      The results of this study are expected to be able to provide policy implications for current policy makers and researchers to suggest how much the digital tax introduction will affect domestic companies.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 예상준, "최근 디지털세 논의 동향과 시사점" 대외경제정책연구원 21 (21): 2021

      2 구자은 ; 정지선, "전자상거래 관련 법인세제의 국제적 동향과 문제점" 한국세무학회 16 (16): 99-127, 2015

      3 김신언, "디지털세의 최근 입법동향과 우리나라 세제개편 방안" 한국세법학회 27 (27): 363-416, 2021

      4 "디지털세 필라2 모델규정 공개-글로벌 최저한세 도입을 위한 입법 지침 합의-"

      5 이규엽, "디지털세 논의에 관한 경제학적 고찰" 대외경제정책연구원 19-21, 2020

      6 전은경, "디지털세 국제논의 최근 동향과 산업적 시사점" 국회 입법조사처 2020

      7 김신언, "디지털경제의 세원(稅源), 데이터" 한국세무학회 22 (22): 219-249, 2021

      8 허원, "디지털경제 관련 국제조세 분야의 최근 논의와 대응 동향" 한국세무학회 21 (21): 205-228, 2020

      9 김선일 ; 박성욱 ; 나형종, "디지털 세금(Digital Tax) 도입을 위한 논의" 한국조세연구포럼 20 (20): 41-67, 2020

      10 최용환 ; 홍욱선, "디지털 경제의 국제조세 과세원칙 개정논의와 향후 과제- 미국 바이든 세제개혁 및 OECD 2 필라 IF 합의를 중심으로 -" 한국국제조세협회 37 (37): 1-63, 2021

      1 예상준, "최근 디지털세 논의 동향과 시사점" 대외경제정책연구원 21 (21): 2021

      2 구자은 ; 정지선, "전자상거래 관련 법인세제의 국제적 동향과 문제점" 한국세무학회 16 (16): 99-127, 2015

      3 김신언, "디지털세의 최근 입법동향과 우리나라 세제개편 방안" 한국세법학회 27 (27): 363-416, 2021

      4 "디지털세 필라2 모델규정 공개-글로벌 최저한세 도입을 위한 입법 지침 합의-"

      5 이규엽, "디지털세 논의에 관한 경제학적 고찰" 대외경제정책연구원 19-21, 2020

      6 전은경, "디지털세 국제논의 최근 동향과 산업적 시사점" 국회 입법조사처 2020

      7 김신언, "디지털경제의 세원(稅源), 데이터" 한국세무학회 22 (22): 219-249, 2021

      8 허원, "디지털경제 관련 국제조세 분야의 최근 논의와 대응 동향" 한국세무학회 21 (21): 205-228, 2020

      9 김선일 ; 박성욱 ; 나형종, "디지털 세금(Digital Tax) 도입을 위한 논의" 한국조세연구포럼 20 (20): 41-67, 2020

      10 최용환 ; 홍욱선, "디지털 경제의 국제조세 과세원칙 개정논의와 향후 과제- 미국 바이든 세제개혁 및 OECD 2 필라 IF 합의를 중심으로 -" 한국국제조세협회 37 (37): 1-63, 2021

      11 "https://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/tax-challenges-arising-from-digitalisation-report-on-pillar-one-bluepri nt-beba0634-en.htm"

      12 "https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-10-28/man-making-ireland-tax-avoidance-hub-globa lly-proves-local-hero"

      13 "https://mnetax.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/US-slides-for-Inclusive-Framework-meeting-of-4-8-21-2.pdf"

      14 Gastaldi, F, "The Digital Services Tax:EU Harmonisation and Unilateral Measures" 2019

      15 Cui, W., "The Digital Services Tax as a Tax on Location-specific Rent" 2019

      16 Bourreau, M., "Taxation of a Digital Monopoly Platform" 20 (20): 40-51, 2018

      17 Bloch, F., "Taxation and Privacy Protection on Internet Platforms" 20 (20): 52-66, 2018

      18 OECD, "Tax database"

      19 Belleflamme, P., "Tax Incidence on Competing Two-sided Platforms" 20 (20): 9-21, 2018

      20 Zucman, G, "Tax Evasion on Offshore Profits and Wealth" 28 (28): 121-148, 2014

      21 Bloch, F., "Profit-sharing Rules and the Taxation of Multinational Internet Platforms" 2019

      22 노현정, "OECD 디지털세 논의동향과 대응방안" 국회 입법조사처 2020

      23 Heckemeyer, J. H., "Multinationals’ Profit Response to Tax Differentials :Effect Size and Shifting Channels" 50 (50): 965-994, 2017

      24 Bukht R, "Defining. Conceptualizing and Measuring the Digital Economy. GDI Development Informatics" University of Manchester 2017

      25 "2020년 감사보고서 및 사업보고서(삼성전자(주), SK하이닉스(주))"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼