How Are Conference Interpreters Using Technology Before, During, and After Interpreting? An Analysis of Korea's Case

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study investigates the use of Computer-Assisted Interpreting (CAI) tools among interpreters in Korea to gain insights into their technological practices before, during, and after interpreting. To this end, the Korean Association of Translators and Interpreters (KATI) conducted a survey in February 2023, targeting 200 active conference interpreters. In the pre-interpreting phase, interpreters frequently use paper, laptop computers, and general office tools, while specialized glossary software is underused. During interpreting, tools were used differently for simultaneous and consecutive interpreting, in both online and offline settings. Pen and paper remain the most popular note-taking tools during consecutive interpreting. Subsequent to interpreting, the respondents organized glossaries, wrote transcripts, and monitored video and audio recordings using various tools. In this regard, respondents indicated the usefulness of voice recognition, specialized terminology, numerical conversions, and collaboration tools. To promote efficiency in the work environment for Korean interpreters, this study recommends developing CAI tools tailored for Korean users and improving relevant training.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Fantinuoli, C, "Wacky! Working papers on the Web as Corpus" GEDIT 173-190, 2006

2 Cho, J., "Utilisation du web comme corpus et de ses outils d’analyse en didactique de la traduction franco-coréenne-BootCat et Sketch Engine" 73 : 107-133, 2021

3 Prandi, B., "Use of CAI tools in interpreters’ training : a pilot study" 37 : 48-57, 2015

4 최문선, "Trends in machine translation research within the translation studies community in Korea" 24 (24): 275-297, 2019

5 Corpas Pastor, G., "Tools for interpreters : the challenges that lie ahead" 5 : 157-182, 2018

6 Orlando, M., "To Know how to Suggest -: Approaches to Teaching Conference Interpreting" Frank & Timme GmbH 171-200, 2015

7 Willoughby, K., "Theory of Technology" Routledge 119-154, 2004

8 Chen, S., "The effectiveness of computer-assisted interpreting : a preliminary study based on English-Chinese consecutive interpreting" 18 (18): 399-420, 2023

9 Fantinuoli, C., "The Routledge Handbook of Conference Interpreting" Routledge 508-522, 2021

10 Al-Jarf, R., "Text-to-speech software as a resource for independent interpreting practice by undergraduate interpreting students" 2 (2): 32-39, 2022

11 Rütten A., "Terminology management tools for conference interpreters–current tools and how they address the specific needs of interpreters" 39 : 98-103, 2017

12 박영란, "Tense equivalence in translation from English to Korean by focusing on English present progressives" 15 (15): 165-194, 2017

13 최문선, "Technology-driven terminology preparation for interpretation in specialized domains" 20 (20): 163-191, 2018

14 Costa, H., "Technology-assisted interpreting" 143 : 27-32, 2014

15 Goldsmith, J., "Tablet interpreting: consecutive interpreting 2.0" 13 (13): 342-365, 2018

16 Gaber, M., "Speech to text technology as a documentation tool for interpreters : a new approach to compiling an ad hoc corpus and extracting terminology from videorecorded speeches" 24 : 263-281, 2020

17 Rodriguez, S., "SmarTerp: a CAI system to support simultaneous interpreters in real-time" 102-109, 2021

18 Hamidi, M., "Simultaneous consecutive interpreting : a new technique put to the test" 52 (52): 276-289, 2007

19 Braun, S., "Routledge Handbook of Translation and Technology" Routledge 2019

20 곽중철 ; 한승희, "Revisiting machine translation error typology through human post-editing" 22 (22): 1-25, 2018

21 이상빈, "Review of literature on machine translation : based on arts and humanities journals covered in KCI Journal Database(from 2011 to early 2020)" 22 (22): 75-104, 2020

22 Cadwell, P., "Resistance and accommodation : factors for the(non-)adoption of machine translation among professional translators" 26 (26): 301-321, 2018

23 이주리애, "Quality of neural machine translation for the Korean-Japanese language pair : the development of editing codes for machine translation" 20 (20): 43-71, 2018

24 최문선, "Prototype development for an AI-based CAI tool : technological support for interpretation of numbers" 23 (23): 9-35, 2022

25 이주리애, "Preliminary research on the application of automatic speech recognition in interpretation" 12 (12): 2407-2422, 2021

26 진실희, "Limitations of machine translation : focused on the role of cognitive complements in human communication" 21 (21): 167-199, 2017

27 Corpas Pastor, G., "Language technology for interpreters : the VIP project" 42 : 35-48, 2020

28 Pérez Pérez, "La Enseñanza de la Interpretación de Conferencias: un Estudio Empírico con Metodología de Corpus" University of Málaga 2013

29 Bilgen, "Investigating Terminology Management for Conference Interpreters" University of Ottawa 2009

30 Fantinuoli, C., "Interpreting and the emerging augmented paradigm" 2 (2): 185-194, 2022

31 Mellinger, C. D., "Interpreter traits and the relationship with technology and visibility" 13 (13): 366-392, 2018

32 Fantinuoli, C., "InterpretBank : redefining computer-assisted interpreting tools" 38 : 42-53, 2016

33 Berber-Irabien, D, "Information and Communication Technologies in Conference Interpreting" Universitat Rovira i Virgili 2010

34 Electronic Times., "ITU Survey Reveals Korea's Internet Usage Rate at 98%, World's Highest Digital Connectivity"

35 Lesznyák, Á., "Hungarian translators’ perceptions of neural machine translation in the European commission" 16-22, 2019

36 최문선, "Human-machine collaboration in interpreting : a review of the state of the art in computer-assisted interpreting(CAI)research" 26 (26): 133-163, 2022

37 상우연, "Educational suggestions based on the current situations of remote interpreting and demands for interpreters" 21 (21): 129-159, 2020

38 Delgado, P., "Don't throw away your printed books : a meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension" 25 : 23-38, 2018

39 Xu, R., "Corpus-based terminological preparation for simultaneous interpreting" 20 (20): 29-58, 2018

40 Tarasenko, R. O, "Conceptual aspects of interpreter training using modern simultaneous interpretation technologies"

41 Ortiz, L. E. S., "Computer-assisted interpreting tools(CAI)and options for automation with automatic speech recognition" 32 : 9-31, 2018

42 Martin, W., "Computer aided interpreting (CAI) for conference interpreters: concepts, content and prospects" 13 (13): 37-71, 2020

43 Will, M., "Computer aided interpreting (CAI) for conference interpreters. concepts, content and prospects" 13 : 37-71, 2020

44 한승희, "Comparing style shift among machine translation, human translation and transcreation : case study of commercial advertisement translation" 21 (21): 163-188, 2017

45 Yvonne Tsai, "Collaborating in a flipped translation classroom : the student perception" 10 (10): 49-73, 2020

46 김순미, "Coexistence of humans and machines in the era of artificial intelligence" 20 (20): 1-32, 2018

47 Wang, X., "Can computer-assisted interpreting tools assist interpreting?" 3 : 109-139, 2019

48 Frittella, F. M., "CAI tool-supported SI of numbers : a theoretical and methodological contribution" 14 (14): 32-56, 2022

49 Defrancq, B., "Automatic speech recognition in the booth : assessment of system performance, interpreters’ performances and interactions in the context of numbers" 33 (33): 73-102, 2021

50 이주리애, "Analysis on sight translation assisted by automatic speech recognition focused on the use of ClovaNote and Fluency" 101 : 15-32, 2022

51 박영란, "Analyses of English proverbs translated from translation machines" 16 (16): 131-151, 2018

52 서보현 ; 김순영, "An analysis of errors in machine translation" 19 (19): 99-117, 2018

53 Corpas Pastor, G, "A survey of interpreters’ needs and practices related to language technology"

54 최효은 ; 이지은, "A study on the evaluation of Korean-English patent machine translation–focusing on KIPRIS K2E-PAT translation" 19 (19): 139-178, 2017

55 이지혜 ; 이용훈, "A study on the establishment of corpus-based terminology list for the preparation of specialized interpretations : focused on economic and financial domains in the speech" 21 (21): 269-297, 2020

56 Orlando, M., "A study on the amenability of digital pen technology in a hybrid mode of interpreting : consec-simul with notes" 6 (6): 39-54, 2014

57 이주리애, "A study of interpreter training in the changing digital environment focused on the use of automatic speech recognition" 133 : 95-114, 2022

58 이준호, "A study for post-editing education : difference between post-editing and human translation" 20 (20): 73-96, 2018

59 이지은 ; 최문선, "A pedagogy for effective notetaking for consecutive interpreting : a case study of notetaking for English-Korean consecutive interpreting" 16 (16): 169-195, 2012

60 Jin, S., "A model of live interlingual subtitling using respeaking technology" 66 (66): 733-749, 2020

61 Costa, H., "A comparative user evaluation of terminology management tools for interpreters" 68-76, 2014

62 장애리, "A comparative analysis of Korean and Chinese studies on the technological turn in interpreting" 22 (22): 221-253, 2021

63 이주리애, "A case study on the usability of automatic speech recognition as an auxiliary tool for consecutive interpreting" 13 (13): 937-952, 2022

64 Korea Tourism Office, "A Report on Global Hosts of International Conferences in 2021"