RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    주식회사의 지배구조 = Corporate Governance of Stock Corporation

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101613253

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The Korean Pre-Stock Exchange Act after IMF economy crisis adopted
    mandatory outside(independent) directors system in listed stock corporations
    and mandatory audit committee system in large size listed stock corporation,
    but did not accept executive officer system which has close relation with
    outside directors system and audit committee system. Therefore, new
    adopted outside directors system and audit committee system did not work
    better than former systems(board of directors’ system and auditor system). In
    other words, executive function and supervisory function in big corporations
    absolutely should be separate in order to increase both the effect of
    supervisory function of board of directors with outside directors and the
    effect of audit function of audit committee which is one of the committees
    under board of directors.
    2008 Government Amendment Draft of Korean Commercial Code provides
    for medium or large size stock corporations to adopt executive officer
    system voluntarily, but I recommend the amendments about executive officer
    system of Korean Commercial Code as follows :
    (1) Large size stock corporations mandatorily should adopt executive
    officer system, because the board of directors of such corporations is
    composed of a majority outside directors and has priority function in the
    supervision of executive organ(executive officers). (2) Medium size stock corporations in principle voluntarily can adopt
    executive officer system. But medium size stock corporations whose board
    of directors is composed of a majority outside directors, mandatorily should
    adopt executive officer system in the same way as the large size stock
    corporations. If the medium size stock corporations adopt executive officer
    system, they should constitute audit committee as audit organ. On the
    contrary, if the medium size stock corporations do not adopt executive
    officer system, they should constitute auditor as audit organ.
    번역하기

    The Korean Pre-Stock Exchange Act after IMF economy crisis adopted mandatory outside(independent) directors system in listed stock corporations and mandatory audit committee system in large size listed stock corporation, but did not accept executive o...

    The Korean Pre-Stock Exchange Act after IMF economy crisis adopted
    mandatory outside(independent) directors system in listed stock corporations
    and mandatory audit committee system in large size listed stock corporation,
    but did not accept executive officer system which has close relation with
    outside directors system and audit committee system. Therefore, new
    adopted outside directors system and audit committee system did not work
    better than former systems(board of directors’ system and auditor system). In
    other words, executive function and supervisory function in big corporations
    absolutely should be separate in order to increase both the effect of
    supervisory function of board of directors with outside directors and the
    effect of audit function of audit committee which is one of the committees
    under board of directors.
    2008 Government Amendment Draft of Korean Commercial Code provides
    for medium or large size stock corporations to adopt executive officer
    system voluntarily, but I recommend the amendments about executive officer
    system of Korean Commercial Code as follows :
    (1) Large size stock corporations mandatorily should adopt executive
    officer system, because the board of directors of such corporations is
    composed of a majority outside directors and has priority function in the
    supervision of executive organ(executive officers). (2) Medium size stock corporations in principle voluntarily can adopt
    executive officer system. But medium size stock corporations whose board
    of directors is composed of a majority outside directors, mandatorily should
    adopt executive officer system in the same way as the large size stock
    corporations. If the medium size stock corporations adopt executive officer
    system, they should constitute audit committee as audit organ. On the
    contrary, if the medium size stock corporations do not adopt executive
    officer system, they should constitute auditor as audit organ.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 정찬형, "주식회사 지배구조관련 개정의견" 한국상사법학회 24 (24): 2005

    2 전우현, "주식회사 감사위원회제도의 개선에 관한 일고찰 -집행임원제 필요성에 관한 검토의 부가-" 한국상사법학회 23 (23): 251-295, 2004

    3 정찬형, "상법강의(上)" 박영사 2009

    4 법무부, "상법(회사법)개정 공청회자료" 2006

    5 국회 법사위, "상법 일부개정 법률안 검토보고서" 2007

    6 강희갑, "미국의 주식회사의 감사위원회제도에 관한 최근 동향과 그 시사점" 20 (20): 2002

    7 정쾌영, "執行任員制度에 관한 商法 改正案의 問題點 檢討" 한국기업법학회 21 (21): 270-296, 2007

    8 High Level Group of Company Law Expert, "Report on a Modern Regulatory Framework for Company Law in Europe"

    9 W. Robert, "Cases and Materials on Corporation, 2nd ed"

    10 정찬형, "2007年 確定한 政府의 商法(會社法) 改正案에 대한 意見" 법학연구원 (50) : 363-399, 2008

    1 정찬형, "주식회사 지배구조관련 개정의견" 한국상사법학회 24 (24): 2005

    2 전우현, "주식회사 감사위원회제도의 개선에 관한 일고찰 -집행임원제 필요성에 관한 검토의 부가-" 한국상사법학회 23 (23): 251-295, 2004

    3 정찬형, "상법강의(上)" 박영사 2009

    4 법무부, "상법(회사법)개정 공청회자료" 2006

    5 국회 법사위, "상법 일부개정 법률안 검토보고서" 2007

    6 강희갑, "미국의 주식회사의 감사위원회제도에 관한 최근 동향과 그 시사점" 20 (20): 2002

    7 정쾌영, "執行任員制度에 관한 商法 改正案의 問題點 檢討" 한국기업법학회 21 (21): 270-296, 2007

    8 High Level Group of Company Law Expert, "Report on a Modern Regulatory Framework for Company Law in Europe"

    9 W. Robert, "Cases and Materials on Corporation, 2nd ed"

    10 정찬형, "2007年 確定한 政府의 商法(會社法) 改正案에 대한 意見" 법학연구원 (50) : 363-399, 2008

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-05-07 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> KOREAN COMMERCIAL LAW ASSOCIATION KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-10-18 학술지등록 한글명 : 상사법연구
    외국어명 : 미등록
    KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1 1 1.07
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.96 0.93 0.979 0.58
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼