Bloom의 신교육목표분류학에 기반한 사회과 성취기준 분석 -2015 개정 초등학교 사회과교육과정을 중심으로- = Analysis of Social Studies Achieve Standards through Bloom`s Taxonomy

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to analyze the achievement standards of the 2015 social studies curriculum of the elementary school by Bloom `s new education goal taxonomy and to provide implications for the statement of future curriculum achievement standards. The results of the analysis of achievement standards based on Bloom `s new education goal taxonomy are as follows. First, in terms of knowledge, achievement standards are concentrated on factual knowledge and conceptual knowledge. Considering cognitive development, it is necessary to increase the proportion of procedural knowledge at the 5-6th grade level. Second, there was no difference in the proportion of knowledge and cognitive processes by grade level. From the viewpoint that the achieve standards of the grading group should be differentiated according to the cognitive development level, it is necessary to increase the weight of the application and analysis activity, which is a more complex cognitive process than the understanding in the 5-6th grade group. Third, it is a hierarchical problem of cognitive process statements. If the curriculum of elementary school social studies focuses on the hierarchy, considering the cognitive development of elementary school, middle school, and high school learner, it is reasonable to state the understanding and applying -centered achievement standard in elementary school social studies education. Fourth, the adequacy of cognitive process statements is a problem. There is a need to discuss whether the cognitive process statements should be comprehensive or specific. Fifth, it is a biased phenomenon of specific sub-cognitive processes in understanding activities. It is necessary to diversify the behavioral elements of the achievement standard so that the learner experiences variously the sub-cognitive process of understanding cognitive process. The statement of achievement standards is an indicator of the whole process of education, from social studies education goals, content selection and organization, education methods, and evaluation. A sophisticated strategy for statements of achievement standards is required for future curriculum development.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 교육부, "초･중등학교 교육과정 총론. 고시 제2015-80호"

2 교육부, "사회과교육과정. 고시 제2015-74호"

3 모경환, "사회과교육과정 시안 개발 연구 개관" 한국교육과정평가원 3-26, 2015

4 이광우, "미래 한국인의 핵심역량 증진을 위한 초･중등교육 교육과정 설계 방안 연구" 한국교육과정평가원 2009

5 Bloom, B. S., "교육목표분류학 1" 교육과학사 1983

6 Anderson, L. W., "교육과정 수업 평가를 위한 새로운 분류학" 아카데미프레스 2005

7 Devito, B., "Characterizing in two science classrooms by the cognitive processes demonstrated by student and teachers" Harvard University 2005

8 김영신, "Bloom의 신 교육목표분류학에 기초한 초등학교 과학과 수업 목표 분석" 한국초등과학교육학회 26 (26): 570-579, 2007

9 강현석, "Bloom의 교육목표분류학에 대한 비판과 그 대안 탐구 -일선 교사들의 인터뷰를 중심으로" 사범대학부속중등교육연구소 53 (53): 51-84, 2005

10 김명옥, "Bloom의 新敎育目標分類學에 基盤한 初等 國語科 敎育課程 目標 分析" 경북대학교 대학원 2013

11 조희형, "Bloom 등의 교육목표 분류론의 본질과 그 문제점" 9 : 29-36, 1984

12 Miller, A. D., "Applying Bloom's revised taxonomy within the framework of teaching for understanding to enhance the frequency and quality of student`s opportunities to develop and practice higher-level cognitive processes" Kalamazoo College 2004

13 Wilson, L. O., "Anderson and Krathwohl - Understanding the New Version of Bloom's Taxonomy"

14 Krathwohl, D. R., "A revision Bloom’s Taxonomy : An Overview" 41 (41): 212-218, 2002

15 은지용, "2015 개정 초등 사회과 교육과정 시안의 기본 방향과 주요 특징 및 변화 양상" 한국사회과교육연구학회 54 (54): 65-83, 2015

16 모경환, "2015 개정 사회과 교육과정의 변화와 쟁점" 한국사회과교육학회 48 (48): 1-30, 2016

17 설규주, "2015 <사회․문화> 교육과정 개발 과정과 특징에 대한 반성적 고찰" 한국사회과교육학회 47 (47): 63-105, 2015