This study evaluates South Korea’s preparedness to regulate Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) that incorporate integrated Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary (RCPB) designs and passive safety systems, using the NuScale Power SMR, which has received approv...
This study evaluates South Korea’s preparedness to regulate Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) that incorporate integrated Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary (RCPB) designs and passive safety systems, using the NuScale Power SMR, which has received approval from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, as a benchmark. A comparative assessment was conducted between the regulatory frameworks of South Korea’s Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, U.S. NRC requirements, and International Atomic Energy Agency safety standards to identify regulatory gaps related to Loss- of-Coolant Accident (LOCA) management, Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) requirements, and the classification of components in integral SMR (i-SMR) designs. Haque SK Nazmul Supervised by Prof. Daeho Lee Dept. of Mechanical Engineering Graduate School of Gachon University The analysis reveals that South Korea’s existing regulatory approach, which is largely based on active ECCS operation and conventional assumptions regarding core uncover during accident conditions, does not fully align with the safety philosophy of advanced SMRs that rely on passive safety mechanisms. Furthermore, the absence of dedicated SMR-specific regulations and clearly defined exemption procedures restricts the adaptability of the current licensing framework. To address these challenges, the study proposes the adoption of risk-informed and performance-based regulatory approaches, the development of specialized guidelines for SMR technologies, and the implementation of structured exemption mechanisms. These measures would facilitate the safe deployment of SMRs in South Korea while enhancing the country’s competitiveness in the evolving field of advanced nuclear energy technology.