This study explored demographic characteristics based everyday lifestyle patterns and preferred spatial requirements of potential collective housing residents in Korea who would pursue ‘Ambient Assisted Living’ with ‘Aging In Place’ initiative...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102653358
2017
Korean
540
KCI우수등재,SCOPUS
학술저널
31-40(10쪽)
1
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This study explored demographic characteristics based everyday lifestyle patterns and preferred spatial requirements of potential collective housing residents in Korea who would pursue ‘Ambient Assisted Living’ with ‘Aging In Place’ initiative...
This study explored demographic characteristics based everyday lifestyle patterns and preferred spatial requirements of potential collective housing residents in Korea who would pursue ‘Ambient Assisted Living’ with ‘Aging In Place’ initiatives. Online questionnaire survey was commissioned for the pre-elderly and elderly age groups of 40s, 50s and above 60s, 801 individuals in total. Survey participants were asked to select 3 most preferred answers among 5 with ranked priority to clearly capture each testee’s true priority choices over 50 carefully designed questions in relation with promoting healthcare sensitive residential spaces. Comprehensive analysis was carried out by processing the survey results with cross-tabulation analysis. The outcome showed fairy unanimous preference patterns across majority of the questions regardless of gender, age, and economic status differences. Formation of separate and independent household, relatively spacious living room, possible layout alteration after moving into a residence, non-slippery bathroom floor, bio-medic sensor embedded chair or sofa were identified as those commonly preferred requirements of physical space design for an household. Some subject groups such as female and age group of over 60s show similar preference profile in the sense that both groups prefer living in the same collective residence when they are aged, cooking ordor ventilating kitchen, bed with storage below, ventilation for kitchen and bathroom. This implies certain demographic groups share their residential preference when aging is in progress. Differentiated residential preference profiles among different demographic groups were also identified. For instance, male, age groups of 50s and over 60s, low-income group prefer living in a same household whereas female, age group of 40s and high-income group turn out to prefer living in a separate household in the same collective housing complex when they are aged. While most of testees prefer garden farming for their apartment veranda, age group of 40s and high-income group express their preference of using veranda as a resting place. Comprehensive analysis on those preference profiles across major demographic classification was summarized in table format focused on healthcare sensitive household unit design. This study is a pioneering attempt to identify a set of preferred health-sensitive lifestyles and residential space requirements to be insightful for planning and designing ‘active aging in place’ supportive collective housing household units in Korean context.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 서동완, "지방도시 노인주거실태와 노인주택 수요분석" 한국주거환경학회 14 (14): 163-175, 2016
2 박정아, "주거공간의 헬스케어 서비스 도입을 위한 공간계획방향 연구" 대한건축학회 29 (29): 93-100, 2013
3 서희숙, "아파트 주동 공용공간 구성요소의 선호도 분석" 한국실내디자인학회 20 (20): 161-171, 2011
4 신한나, "노인주거환경 실태분석을 통한 사용성 평가에 관한 연구" 서울연구원 13 (13): 221-235, 2012
5 김성문, "노인주거복지시설 입주에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석 연구 - 진주시를 중심으로 -" 한국주거환경학회 12 (12): 85-98, 2014
6 김정자, "고령세대의 환경과 헬스 케어 시스템 주택에 관한 연구" 한국전자통신학회 7 (7): 925-930, 2012
7 Belsky, W. D., "Quantification of biological aging in young adults" 112 (112): E4104-E4110, 2015
8 Kwon, O., "Present housing of the elderly and review of housing alternatives for their later life" 5 (5): 67-85, 2012
9 Kim, D., "A study on the resident preference of location type for community spaces within super high-rise apartment building" The Korean Housing Association 33-36, 2009
10 Lyu, H., "A study on the preference for interior spaces in apartment houses" Archives of Design Research 159-166, 2001
1 서동완, "지방도시 노인주거실태와 노인주택 수요분석" 한국주거환경학회 14 (14): 163-175, 2016
2 박정아, "주거공간의 헬스케어 서비스 도입을 위한 공간계획방향 연구" 대한건축학회 29 (29): 93-100, 2013
3 서희숙, "아파트 주동 공용공간 구성요소의 선호도 분석" 한국실내디자인학회 20 (20): 161-171, 2011
4 신한나, "노인주거환경 실태분석을 통한 사용성 평가에 관한 연구" 서울연구원 13 (13): 221-235, 2012
5 김성문, "노인주거복지시설 입주에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석 연구 - 진주시를 중심으로 -" 한국주거환경학회 12 (12): 85-98, 2014
6 김정자, "고령세대의 환경과 헬스 케어 시스템 주택에 관한 연구" 한국전자통신학회 7 (7): 925-930, 2012
7 Belsky, W. D., "Quantification of biological aging in young adults" 112 (112): E4104-E4110, 2015
8 Kwon, O., "Present housing of the elderly and review of housing alternatives for their later life" 5 (5): 67-85, 2012
9 Kim, D., "A study on the resident preference of location type for community spaces within super high-rise apartment building" The Korean Housing Association 33-36, 2009
10 Lyu, H., "A study on the preference for interior spaces in apartment houses" Archives of Design Research 159-166, 2001
바이오미미크리를 활용한 미세먼지 저감 방안에 관한 연구
대전시 서구 중학교 진입공간의 공간구조에 대한 조사연구
Green BIM 기반 건축설계 품질평가를 위한 에너지 성능분석 결과값 가시화 기법 개발
시멘틱 웹을 활용한 BIM기반 유지보수 업무 우선순위 관리 자동화 방안
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2022 | 평가예정 | 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지) | |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2011-03-25 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 대한건축학회논문집 -> 대한건축학회논문집 계획계외국어명 : Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea -> Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design | |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2006-08-02 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Structure&Construction -> Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea | |
2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2005-10-14 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 대한건축학회논문집 구조계 -> 대한건축학회논문집 | |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2001-07-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
1999-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.38 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.41 | 0.4 | 0.742 | 0.11 |