RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      온라인 채널에서의 패션 소비에 관한 구매위험의 = A study on the conceptual structure of purchase risks in fashion consumption through online channels

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106417208

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study was to create a theoretical structure for the concept of purchasing risks by identifying the structure of purchasing risks that lead to obstacles in the purchasing decisions of consumers in fashion consumption via online channels.
      This was a secondary research using books, articles, prior researches, and academic journals on the five topics of “characteristics of fashion consumption,” “the concept of purchasing risks,” “purchasing risks by product types,” “purchasing risks by channel types,” and “purchasing risks of fashion consumption on online shopping channels.” According to the arguments of prior researches, the study divided the purchasing risks of fashion consumption through online shopping into four categories : (1) fundamental purchasing risks including financial risk and time loss risk pertaining to any product or channel, (2) online channel purchase risks, which include risks in payment, Information leaks, and delivery and return/exchange risk, (3) fashion product risk related to product quality or experience of other people, which includes social risks and risks associated with quality, and (4) the online channel×fashion product risks, which include the aesthetic and psychological hazards especially amplified in online channels. The four risk factors were then described with a concept map to systemize the multidimensional and stereoscopic psychological structure of purchasing risks. Of the four risk factors, consumers placed the most emphasis on the online channel×fashion product risks, hence, reducing this risk factor is of utmost priority for marketing of online shopping channels.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study was to create a theoretical structure for the concept of purchasing risks by identifying the structure of purchasing risks that lead to obstacles in the purchasing decisions of consumers in fashion consumption via online chan...

      The purpose of this study was to create a theoretical structure for the concept of purchasing risks by identifying the structure of purchasing risks that lead to obstacles in the purchasing decisions of consumers in fashion consumption via online channels.
      This was a secondary research using books, articles, prior researches, and academic journals on the five topics of “characteristics of fashion consumption,” “the concept of purchasing risks,” “purchasing risks by product types,” “purchasing risks by channel types,” and “purchasing risks of fashion consumption on online shopping channels.” According to the arguments of prior researches, the study divided the purchasing risks of fashion consumption through online shopping into four categories : (1) fundamental purchasing risks including financial risk and time loss risk pertaining to any product or channel, (2) online channel purchase risks, which include risks in payment, Information leaks, and delivery and return/exchange risk, (3) fashion product risk related to product quality or experience of other people, which includes social risks and risks associated with quality, and (4) the online channel×fashion product risks, which include the aesthetic and psychological hazards especially amplified in online channels. The four risk factors were then described with a concept map to systemize the multidimensional and stereoscopic psychological structure of purchasing risks. Of the four risk factors, consumers placed the most emphasis on the online channel×fashion product risks, hence, reducing this risk factor is of utmost priority for marketing of online shopping channels.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김기연, "해외직접구매 소비자의 지각된 위험과 커뮤니티 이용동기, 가격민감도가 고객만족에 미치는 영향: 유·아동복 구매자를 중심으로" 복식문화학회 26 (26): 951-965, 2018

      2 김용숙, "해외 인터넷 쇼핑몰에서 패션상품을 직접 구매하는 소비자의 쇼핑 가치에 따른 위험 지각과 만족도" 복식문화학회 24 (24): 41-53, 2016

      3 홍병숙, "지각된 쾌락적 가치, 유용성 및 용이성이 인터넷 쇼핑몰 이용태도와 패션상품 구매의도에 미치는 영향" 한국의류학회 32 (32): 147-156, 2008

      4 심태용, "인터넷쇼핑몰 이용자의 혁신성이 지각된 제품성능 및 고객충성도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 위험지각 조절효과 중심으로" 한국유통경영학회 21 (21): 87-96, 2018

      5 황진숙, "인터넷쇼핑 및 TV홈쇼핑 위험지각에 따른 의복쇼핑성향, 구매의도, 구매행동" 한국의류학회 29 (29): 637-648, 2005

      6 남은하, "인터넷 패션소비자의 위험지각이 구매결정행동에 미치는 영향" 한국의류학회 33 (33): 1707-1718, 2009

      7 지혜경, "인터넷 의류구매 시 소비자의 위험지각과 반품과의 관계" 한국의류산업학회 10 (10): 917-925, 2008

      8 송명화, "유행선도력에 따른 대행 인터넷 쇼핑몰의 패션제품 구매행동" 한국의류학회 32 (32): 179-189, 2008

      9 박소정, "위험지각과 소비가치가 중장년층 소비자의 친환경 의류제품 구매의도에 미치는 영향 - 위험감소행동의 매개효과를 중심으로 -" 한국패션디자인학회 15 (15): 51-68, 2015

      10 홍희숙, "온라인 점포의 의류상품 구매후기 정보 중요도 - 구매후기를 읽는 동기와 읽는 정도를 중심으로 -" 한국소비문화학회 15 (15): 189-211, 2012

      1 김기연, "해외직접구매 소비자의 지각된 위험과 커뮤니티 이용동기, 가격민감도가 고객만족에 미치는 영향: 유·아동복 구매자를 중심으로" 복식문화학회 26 (26): 951-965, 2018

      2 김용숙, "해외 인터넷 쇼핑몰에서 패션상품을 직접 구매하는 소비자의 쇼핑 가치에 따른 위험 지각과 만족도" 복식문화학회 24 (24): 41-53, 2016

      3 홍병숙, "지각된 쾌락적 가치, 유용성 및 용이성이 인터넷 쇼핑몰 이용태도와 패션상품 구매의도에 미치는 영향" 한국의류학회 32 (32): 147-156, 2008

      4 심태용, "인터넷쇼핑몰 이용자의 혁신성이 지각된 제품성능 및 고객충성도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 위험지각 조절효과 중심으로" 한국유통경영학회 21 (21): 87-96, 2018

      5 황진숙, "인터넷쇼핑 및 TV홈쇼핑 위험지각에 따른 의복쇼핑성향, 구매의도, 구매행동" 한국의류학회 29 (29): 637-648, 2005

      6 남은하, "인터넷 패션소비자의 위험지각이 구매결정행동에 미치는 영향" 한국의류학회 33 (33): 1707-1718, 2009

      7 지혜경, "인터넷 의류구매 시 소비자의 위험지각과 반품과의 관계" 한국의류산업학회 10 (10): 917-925, 2008

      8 송명화, "유행선도력에 따른 대행 인터넷 쇼핑몰의 패션제품 구매행동" 한국의류학회 32 (32): 179-189, 2008

      9 박소정, "위험지각과 소비가치가 중장년층 소비자의 친환경 의류제품 구매의도에 미치는 영향 - 위험감소행동의 매개효과를 중심으로 -" 한국패션디자인학회 15 (15): 51-68, 2015

      10 홍희숙, "온라인 점포의 의류상품 구매후기 정보 중요도 - 구매후기를 읽는 동기와 읽는 정도를 중심으로 -" 한국소비문화학회 15 (15): 189-211, 2012

      11 박혜정, "소비가치가 패스트 패션 브랜드 구매에 미치는 영향" 복식문화학회 23 (23): 468-483, 2015

      12 이정우, "래시가드 디자인 커스터마이징 서비스 이용에 영향을 미치는 소비자의 추구혜택과 지각된 위험" 복식문화학회 26 (26): 598-612, 2018

      13 서상우, "공동구매형 소셜커머스와 프라이빗 쇼핑몰을 이용하여 패션/뷰티 제품을 구매하는 소비자들의 쇼핑 가치" 한국의류학회 38 (38): 161-174, 2014

      14 Keywords of heisei fast fashion, "日本繊研新聞 [Japan Senken Sinbun]"

      15 F. F. El-Sabban, "Value of Processed Poultry Waste as a Feed for Ruminants" Oxford University Press (OUP) 31 (31): 107-111, 1970

      16 Jean D. Hines, "Underlying Determinants of Clothing Quality: The Consumers' Perspective" SAGE Publications 13 (13): 227-233, 2016

      17 Lee, K. H., "The relationships of clothing benefit and clothing attributes evaluation to ego identity of college students" 7 (7): 139-154, 1999

      18 Kouyama, S., "The relationship between perceived fashion risk and need for uniqueness" 39 (39): 15-26, 1996

      19 Cunningham, S. M., "The major dimensions of perceived risk"

      20 Hwang, J. S., "The internet perceived risk segments : clothing benefits sought, internet shopping attitude and internet purchase intention" 27 (27): 746-757, 2003

      21 Willett, A. H., "The economic theory of risk and insurance" Columbia University Press 1901

      22 Jacoby, J., "The component of perceived risk" 382-393, 1972

      23 James W. Taylor, "The Role of Risk in Consumer Behavior" SAGE Publications 38 (38): 54-60, 2018

      24 Kouyama, S., "Social and psychological functions of clothing" 39 (39): 18-22, 1998

      25 Stone, R. N., "Risk: Is it still uncertainty times consequences?" 261-265, 1987

      26 Knight, F. H., "Risk, uncertainty and profit" Noba Press 1921

      27 Jayoung Choi, "Risk perception and e‐shopping: a cross‐cultural study" Emerald 7 (7): 49-64, 2003

      28 Cox, D. F., "Risk handling in consumer behavior:An intensive of study tow case"

      29 Haynes, J., "Risk as an economic factor" 9 (9): 409-412, 1895

      30 Copeland, M. T., "Relation of consumer’s buying habit to marketing methods" 1 (1): 282-289, 1923

      31 Eric A. Greenleaf, "Reasons for Substantial Delay in Consumer Decision Making" Oxford University Press (OUP) 22 (22): 186-, 1995

      32 Mary Ann Eastlick, "Profiling potential adopters and non‐adopters of an interactive electronic shopping medium" Emerald 27 (27): 209-223, 1999

      33 Chaudhuri, A., "Product class effects on perceived risk : the role of emotion" 15 (15): 157-168, 1998

      34 G. R. Dowling, "Perceived risk: The concept and its measurement" Wiley 3 (3): 193-210, 1986

      35 Hisrich, R. D., "Perceived risk in store selection" 9 (9): 435-439, 1972

      36 Cunningham, S. M., "Perceived risk as a factor in informal consumer communications"

      37 Geitel Winakor, "Perceived Fashion Risk and Self-Esteem of Males and Females" Wiley 9 (9): 45-56, 1980

      38 David F. Midgley, "Patterns of Interpersonal Information Seeking for the Purchase of a Symbolic Product" SAGE Publications 20 (20): 74-83, 2018

      39 Jerome B. Kernan, "Meaning, Value, and the Theory of Promotion" Oxford University Press (OUP) 17 (17): 109-135, 1967

      40 Nojima, M., "Information selection and online retail strategy management in an information overload era" Tokyo University 2005

      41 Hoffman, D. L., "Information privacy in the marketspace : Implications for the commercial uses of anonymity on the Web" 15 : 129-139, 1999

      42 James R. Bettman, "Information Processing Models of Consumer Behavior" SAGE Publications 7 (7): 370-376, 2018

      43 Ellen Garbarino, "Gender differences in the perceived risk of buying online and the effects of receiving a site recommendation" Elsevier BV 57 (57): 768-775, 2004

      44 Darby, M. R., "Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud" 16 (16): 67-88, 1973

      45 Bettie Minshall, "Fashion Preferences of Males and Females, Risks Perceived, and Temporal Quality of Styles" Wiley 10 (10): 369-379, 1982

      46 Slovic, P., "Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risk" 181-216, 1980

      47 Kim, G. W., "Direction of digital transformation “e-comers do not exist alone”"

      48 Gary N. Robertson, "Decision making and learning: A simulated marketing manager" Wiley 15 (15): 370-379, 1970

      49 Bauer, R. A., "Consumer behavior as risk-taking" 389-398, 1960

      50 Kouyama, S., "Consumer behavior as risk taking" (342) : 233-244, 2003

      51 Schiffman, L. G., "Consumer behavior" Prentice Hall 1978

      52 Sirrka L. Jarvenpaa, "Consumer Reactions to Electronic Shopping on the World Wide Web" Informa UK Limited 1 (1): 59-88, 2015

      53 Ted Roselius, "Consumer Rankings of Risk Reduction Methods" SAGE Publications 35 (35): 56-, 1971

      54 Chambers, H. G., "Clothing selection: Fashions, figures, fabrics" Lippincott 1961

      55 Ahn, M. Y., "Clothing evaluation criteria and purchase intention based on consumers’clothing shopping orientation in cyber shopping" 27 (27): 789-799, 2003

      56 Soyeon Shim, "Benefit Segments of the Female Apparel Market: Psychographics, Shopping Orientations, and Demographics" SAGE Publications 12 (12): 1-12, 2016

      57 Zikmund, W. G., "An investigation of the role of products characteristics in risk perceptions" 13 (13): 19-33, 1977

      58 Dholakia, M., "An investigation of the relationship between perceived risk and product involvement" 24 : 159-167, 1997

      59 J. Paul Peter, "An Investigation of Perceived Risk at the Brand Level" SAGE Publications 13 (13): 184-188, 2018

      60 Nelson, P., "Advertising as information" 82 (82): 729-754, 1974

      61 Kouyama, S., "A study on the psychological trade-offs between ‘perceived fashion benefit’ and ‘perceived fashion risk’" 31 (31): 488-496, 1990

      62 Kouyama, S., "A proposed method to classify goods by ‘perceived fashion risk’ : On the case of items for dress and personal adornment used by women" 34 (34): 29-40, 1993

      63 Zikmund, W. G., "A multivariate analysis of perceived risk, self-confidence and information sources" 406-416, 1973

      64 Grahame R. Dowling, "A Model of Perceived Risk and Intended Risk-Handling Activity" Oxford University Press (OUP) 21 (21): 119-, 1994

      65 Ministry of Science and ICT, "2018년 인터넷이용 실태조사 [A survey on internet usage in 2018]"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2018-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.63 0.63 0.58
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.55 0.58 0.71 0.12
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼