RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    웹 기반 및 면대면 학습 환경에서의 협력적 CPS와 개별적 CPS가 문제해결과 창의성에 미치는 영향과 패턴 분석 = A pattern analysis and the effects of collaborative and individual CPS on problem solving and creativities in web-based and face to face Learning environment

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75435727

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of the study is to investigate the following quantitative and qualitative research questions. In quantitative research, the study tried to identify the effects of types of learning environments(Web and F2F), types of CPS(collaborative and individual), and group cohesiveness on problem solving skills and creativities. In qualitative research, the study tried to find different patterns of collaborative patterns according to types of learning environment, levels of group cohesiveness, levels of group problem solving, group creativities. The subjects were undergraduate students. They were assigned into four groups randomly and the experiment were conducted for five weeks. The results of quantitative study were interesting. First, the collaborative CPS is more effective in problem solving skills both Web and F2F learning environments than individual CPS. Second, the collaborative CPS is more effective also in creativities both Web and F2F learning environments than individual CPS. Third, the groups that has high group cohesiveness show high score in problem solving skills and creativity in F2F learning environment but there is no differences in Web-based learning environment. According to qualitative research data, the groups that has high score in group cohesiveness, problem solving skills and creativities reach collaborative knowledge building through exploratory discussion that means group members negotiate meaning or debate critically but constructively among group members. However, the groups that has low score in group cohesiveness, problem solving skills and creativities show collective knowledge building or dogmatic knowledge building through cumulative or disputative discussion that means group members discuss positively but uncritically or individualized decision making. The study could provide useful resources for studying collaborative CPS and guideline for practice collaborative CPS in education filed.
    번역하기

    The purpose of the study is to investigate the following quantitative and qualitative research questions. In quantitative research, the study tried to identify the effects of types of learning environments(Web and F2F), types of CPS(collaborative and ...

    The purpose of the study is to investigate the following quantitative and qualitative research questions. In quantitative research, the study tried to identify the effects of types of learning environments(Web and F2F), types of CPS(collaborative and individual), and group cohesiveness on problem solving skills and creativities. In qualitative research, the study tried to find different patterns of collaborative patterns according to types of learning environment, levels of group cohesiveness, levels of group problem solving, group creativities. The subjects were undergraduate students. They were assigned into four groups randomly and the experiment were conducted for five weeks. The results of quantitative study were interesting. First, the collaborative CPS is more effective in problem solving skills both Web and F2F learning environments than individual CPS. Second, the collaborative CPS is more effective also in creativities both Web and F2F learning environments than individual CPS. Third, the groups that has high group cohesiveness show high score in problem solving skills and creativity in F2F learning environment but there is no differences in Web-based learning environment. According to qualitative research data, the groups that has high score in group cohesiveness, problem solving skills and creativities reach collaborative knowledge building through exploratory discussion that means group members negotiate meaning or debate critically but constructively among group members. However, the groups that has low score in group cohesiveness, problem solving skills and creativities show collective knowledge building or dogmatic knowledge building through cumulative or disputative discussion that means group members discuss positively but uncritically or individualized decision making. The study could provide useful resources for studying collaborative CPS and guideline for practice collaborative CPS in education filed.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼