RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      남북한 과학기술통합에 관한 연구 = A Study of Science and Technology Integration between South and North Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3143838

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Under the rapidily changing world politics and economy, Korea would be reunified even though the unification process is not yet agreed between South and North Korea. No matter what the unification process will be, integration is necessaIY to achieve a real unification. Spe-cially the integration in the field of Science and Technology (S&T) is very important because S &T plays critical roles m today's economy.
      This paper theoretically examines the workable concept of S&T integration between South and North Korea.
      The integratim could be classified three types according to the characteristics of S&T activities and areas. First, the horizontal integration is accomplished between R&D actors focus-ing on similar R&D in similar aFea. This type could be prevent duplicate researches and in-crease the efficiency of R&D actors. Seem1d, the vertical integratuon occurs between R&D actors with different R&D concentration in similar area. It could decrease transaction cost in R &D cycle but increase management cost. Third, the mixed integration occurs between R&D actors with different concentration in different areas. This type could increase not only the au-tonomy and competitiveness of R&D actors but also the management cost. Of all alternative in integration, the mixed type could be pursued deliberateIy as technologies become more comples, complicated, systematic, and fused. Of course, the detailed evaluation and review of the North
      Korean innovation system should be carried out before an actua integration process starts. Finally it is worthwhile to keep in mind a few points as policy implications.
      번역하기

      Under the rapidily changing world politics and economy, Korea would be reunified even though the unification process is not yet agreed between South and North Korea. No matter what the unification process will be, integration is necessaIY to achieve a...

      Under the rapidily changing world politics and economy, Korea would be reunified even though the unification process is not yet agreed between South and North Korea. No matter what the unification process will be, integration is necessaIY to achieve a real unification. Spe-cially the integration in the field of Science and Technology (S&T) is very important because S &T plays critical roles m today's economy.
      This paper theoretically examines the workable concept of S&T integration between South and North Korea.
      The integratim could be classified three types according to the characteristics of S&T activities and areas. First, the horizontal integration is accomplished between R&D actors focus-ing on similar R&D in similar aFea. This type could be prevent duplicate researches and in-crease the efficiency of R&D actors. Seem1d, the vertical integratuon occurs between R&D actors with different R&D concentration in similar area. It could decrease transaction cost in R &D cycle but increase management cost. Third, the mixed integration occurs between R&D actors with different concentration in different areas. This type could increase not only the au-tonomy and competitiveness of R&D actors but also the management cost. Of all alternative in integration, the mixed type could be pursued deliberateIy as technologies become more comples, complicated, systematic, and fused. Of course, the detailed evaluation and review of the North
      Korean innovation system should be carried out before an actua integration process starts. Finally it is worthwhile to keep in mind a few points as policy implications.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I.머리말
      • II.통합의 방향
      • 1.효율성
      • 2.공정성
      • 3.사회·문화적 특수성 고려
      • I.머리말
      • II.통합의 방향
      • 1.효율성
      • 2.공정성
      • 3.사회·문화적 특수성 고려
      • 4. 보완성
      • 5. 미래지향성
      • III.통합의 유형
      • 1.수평 통합
      • 2.수직 통합
      • 3.혼합통합
      • 4.통합유형의 비교
      • Ⅳ.통합유형에 따른 과학기술정책
      • 1.수평통합에 따른 정책
      • 2.수직통합에 따른 정책
      • 3.혼합통합에 따른정책
      • lV.맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      • SUMMARY
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼