RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Counter Strategies and Policy Agenda of Private Security against New Terrorism

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104101782

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Unlike terrorism in the past, new terrorism does not have any form or battle line and it softens the targets by targeting civilians. As terrorist targets are changing to soft targets such as public facilities, it is crucial for police or local government, which are closest to citizen’s life, to take measures for terrorism prevention. In addition, the role of private security guards is very important as they are allocated to the field such as buildings or facilities. However, there is a tendency in Korea to regard private security at much lower level than public security, playing secondary roles. This perception becomes problems in maximizing the capacity for national crisis management and counter-terrorism.
    Recently, police and various organizations in private sector have engaged in so-called cooperative security to prevent different types of crimes and made several achievements. In this context, it is necessary to analyze the role of private security in dealing with new terrorism more efficiently.
    This research made the following suggestions for the strategies of private security in order to respond to new terrorism efficiently and proactively.
    First, The September 11 terrorist attack in New York provided a motivation for not only the U. S. but also developed countries like the U. K. to strengthen the system of mutual cooperation between police and private security. In responding to terrorism, police and private security have a number of advantages through various programs for mutual cooperation.
    Second, the most important factor for counter-terrorism activities is training of human resources with potentials to make them highly professional. The training system for private security should be strengthened to enhance the capacity to respond to new terrorism. In addition, certain degree of specialization should be obtained by introducing license system for security guards engaging in anti-terrorism missions.
    The qualifications of security guards should be diversified and specialized based on their tasks Third, the public security should not be relied on for safety management of various local festivals and events with a large number of participants. A large portion of safety management should be transferred to private security.
    Fourth, there should be thorough countermeasures against cyber terror, which is used as a means of new terrorism.
    Lastly, anti-terrorism measures should not be participated by police, military or National Intelligence Service only. Anti-terrorism measures are the responsibility of the whole nation and the international cooperative system is also crucial. In particular, in a situation where the capacity of private security is rapidly increasing, private security should be recognized as an important actor, capable of resolving problems, in national counter-terrorism policy.
    번역하기

    Unlike terrorism in the past, new terrorism does not have any form or battle line and it softens the targets by targeting civilians. As terrorist targets are changing to soft targets such as public facilities, it is crucial for police or local governm...

    Unlike terrorism in the past, new terrorism does not have any form or battle line and it softens the targets by targeting civilians. As terrorist targets are changing to soft targets such as public facilities, it is crucial for police or local government, which are closest to citizen’s life, to take measures for terrorism prevention. In addition, the role of private security guards is very important as they are allocated to the field such as buildings or facilities. However, there is a tendency in Korea to regard private security at much lower level than public security, playing secondary roles. This perception becomes problems in maximizing the capacity for national crisis management and counter-terrorism.
    Recently, police and various organizations in private sector have engaged in so-called cooperative security to prevent different types of crimes and made several achievements. In this context, it is necessary to analyze the role of private security in dealing with new terrorism more efficiently.
    This research made the following suggestions for the strategies of private security in order to respond to new terrorism efficiently and proactively.
    First, The September 11 terrorist attack in New York provided a motivation for not only the U. S. but also developed countries like the U. K. to strengthen the system of mutual cooperation between police and private security. In responding to terrorism, police and private security have a number of advantages through various programs for mutual cooperation.
    Second, the most important factor for counter-terrorism activities is training of human resources with potentials to make them highly professional. The training system for private security should be strengthened to enhance the capacity to respond to new terrorism. In addition, certain degree of specialization should be obtained by introducing license system for security guards engaging in anti-terrorism missions.
    The qualifications of security guards should be diversified and specialized based on their tasks Third, the public security should not be relied on for safety management of various local festivals and events with a large number of participants. A large portion of safety management should be transferred to private security.
    Fourth, there should be thorough countermeasures against cyber terror, which is used as a means of new terrorism.
    Lastly, anti-terrorism measures should not be participated by police, military or National Intelligence Service only. Anti-terrorism measures are the responsibility of the whole nation and the international cooperative system is also crucial. In particular, in a situation where the capacity of private security is rapidly increasing, private security should be recognized as an important actor, capable of resolving problems, in national counter-terrorism policy.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이창용, "테러리즘 방지를 위한 한국형 위기관리시스템 구축방안" 한국지방정부학회 9 (9): 203-226, 2005

    2 김범중, "뉴테러리즘과 국가위기관리" 한국콘텐츠학회 9 (9): 284-291, 2009

    3 Jang, Seok-heon, "study on Counter-terrorism on essential national facilities" 2005

    4 Choi, Jin-tae, "Theory and practice of terrorism" Daeyoung Publishing Company 2006

    5 Kim, Doo-hyeon, "Theories of modern terrorism" Baeksan publishing company 2005

    6 Wilkinson, Paul, "Terrorism and the Liberal State, 2nd" New York University Press 1986

    7 Beck, Ulrich, "Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity(translated by Mark Ritter)" Sage Publications 1998

    8 Park, Dong-Kyun, "Response of private security industry in dangerous society" 10 : 103-125, 2005

    9 Cunningham, William C., "Private Security Trends 1970 to 2000. The Hallcrest Report II" Butterworth-Heinemann 1990

    10 Arthur, J. Bilek, "Private Security" Anderson Publishing co 1997

    1 이창용, "테러리즘 방지를 위한 한국형 위기관리시스템 구축방안" 한국지방정부학회 9 (9): 203-226, 2005

    2 김범중, "뉴테러리즘과 국가위기관리" 한국콘텐츠학회 9 (9): 284-291, 2009

    3 Jang, Seok-heon, "study on Counter-terrorism on essential national facilities" 2005

    4 Choi, Jin-tae, "Theory and practice of terrorism" Daeyoung Publishing Company 2006

    5 Kim, Doo-hyeon, "Theories of modern terrorism" Baeksan publishing company 2005

    6 Wilkinson, Paul, "Terrorism and the Liberal State, 2nd" New York University Press 1986

    7 Beck, Ulrich, "Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity(translated by Mark Ritter)" Sage Publications 1998

    8 Park, Dong-Kyun, "Response of private security industry in dangerous society" 10 : 103-125, 2005

    9 Cunningham, William C., "Private Security Trends 1970 to 2000. The Hallcrest Report II" Butterworth-Heinemann 1990

    10 Arthur, J. Bilek, "Private Security" Anderson Publishing co 1997

    11 Park, Dong-Kyun, "Possibilities of terrorist incidents in Korea and national counter strategies" 2 (2): 81-111, 2009

    12 Jang, gi-bung, "Possibilities of new terrorism incidents in Korea and national counter strategies against new terrorism" 2008

    13 Wardlaw, Grant, "Political Terrorism: Theory and Counter-Measure, 3rd ed" Cambridge University press 1994

    14 Oh, Tae-gon, "Legal review of North Korea’s terrorism in the era of new terrorism" 21 : 369-392, 2006

    15 Che, Jae-byeong, "International terrorism and military response" 44 (44): 55-74, 2004

    16 Cho, Gwang-rae, "Examination of national crisis management system and roles of private security" 5 (5): 57-75, 2008

    17 Lee, Heon-gyeng, "Essence of terror and Korea’s direction in anti-terrorism" 3 (3): 341-360, 2003

    18 Park, Dong-Kyun, "Development of Korea’s civil defense system against terrorism" 31 : 201-223, 2008

    19 Crowe, T., "Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design - Applications of Architectural Design and Space Management Concepts. Second Edition" National Crime Prevention Institute 2000

    20 National Intelligence Service, "Characteristics of new terrorism and trends of strengthening anti-terrorism abroad"

    21 National Intelligence Service, "Background for the Prevention of Terrorism Act"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2028 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.89 0.89 0.8
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.85 0.78 0.882 0.42
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼