좋은 대학수업의 특성에 대한 문화기술적 사례 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics of good college classes by analyzing the Humanities and Social Sciences courses that were rated as 'good'. In a two-year ethnographic case study, researcher performed 28 classroom observations and in-depth interviews with the professors and students of 6 classes rated 'good'. For the analysis and integration of the data, taxonomic analysis was used. The findings of this research were as follows.
First, in terms of programming and presentation of contents, good college classes were those where the professors provided various meaningful content in a well-structured manner, and through a structured learning content. Furthermore, professors gave clear and logical explanations, used a sense of humor in conjunction with learning content, and offered tasks which induced intensive study. Second, in terms of learning methods, good college classes provided various learning activities and induced learners' participation through active interaction. Third, in terms of learning motivation and learning support, good college classes provided students the opportunities to prove academic achievement through continuous feedback from the professor; supported intellectual stimulation, self-confidence and passion of the students; encouraged students' active participation; supported task performance; and provided learning strategies. Fourth, in terms of class management, good college classes managed the whole course of the semester as well as each unit class. Fifth, in terms of student assessment and classroom assessment, good college classes assessed the students and the class in various ways.
The most fundamental factors contributing to a good class were the professor's passion for teaching and devotion to his or her students, as well as the professor's knowledge about the content of the major classes and of various teaching methods. Preparation for class and reflection of the class is thus based on the professor's passion and knowledge. Through efforts to improve class quality, these classes will be memorable for the students.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 민혜리, "학생들이 인식하는 좋은 강의의 특성 연구 : 국내 대학과 해외 대학의 강의 체험 분석을 중심으로" 한국열린교육학회 19 (19): 57-88, 2011

2 권성연, "학교급과 교사 경력에 따른 좋은 수업에 대한 중요도 및 실행수준 인식 차이" 한국열린교육학회 18 (18): 78-103, 2010

3 김주훈, "학교 교육 내실화 방안 연구(Ⅱ)-좋은 수업 사례에 대한 질적 접근-" 한국교육과정평가원 2002

4 조난심, "학교 교육 내실화 방안 연구(Ⅰ)" 한국교육과정평가원 2001

5 Spradley, J. P., "참여관찰 방법" 대한교과서 주식회사 1989

6 양진향, "질적 연구 방법론" 이화여자대학교출판부 2004

7 조용환, "질적 연구 : 방법과 사례" 교육과학사 1999

8 Stake, E. R., "질적 사례 연구" 창지사 2000

9 손승남, "좋은 수업의 조건 : 교수론적 관점들" 한국교육사상연구회 20 (20): 115-134, 2006

10 서경혜, "좋은 수업에 대한 관점과 개념: 교사와 학생 면담 연구" 한국교육과정학회 22 (22): 165-187, 2004

11 이은화(李恩花), "좋은 대학수업의 특징과 그 의미: 한국 대학생의 관점에서" 한국교육사상연구회 22 (22): 123-146, 2008

12 안지혜, "좋은 대학수업의 특성 분석 연구" 3-49, 2013

13 이화진, "제7차 교육과정 적용에 따른 수준별 수업 자료 개발 연구" 한국교육과정평가원 2001

14 이혜정, "연구중심대학의 강의 질 향상 정책 및 전략 연구" 한국교육학회 47 (47): 145-174, 2009

15 이성호, "세계의 대학교수" 문음사 1995

16 이용숙, "분류체계 성분분석법 재개발 실행연구 : 수업분석 적용사례를 중심으로" 한국열린교육학회 17 (17): 99-128, 2009

17 Bain, K., "미국 최고의 교수들은 어떻게 가르치는가" 뜨인돌 2005

18 Spradley, J. P., "문화기술적 면접법" 시그마프레스 2003

19 조벽, "명강의 노하우 & 노와이" 해냄출판사 2010

20 박민정, "대학에서의 좋은 수업에 대한 학생의 인식 ―다시 듣고 싶은 수업 에세이 분석―" 인문과학연구소 35 (35): 229-253, 2008

21 정은이, "대학에서의 좋은 수업에 대한 교수자와 학습자의 인식" 한국교육방법학회 22 (22): 25-44, 2010

22 김태완, "대학에서의 인문학 수업에 대한 교수와 학생의 인식과 우수 인문학 강의 사례 분석" 교육과학연구소 37 (37): 101-128, 2006

23 김재건, "대학생들의 의견 조사를 통한 대학 수업 개선 영역 고찰" 한국교육학회 46 (46): 121-150, 2008

24 김경화, "대학교육의 수월성강화를 위한 대학수업의 질적 개선에 대한 사례연구" 한국열린교육학회 11 (11): 345-375, 2003

25 이영호, "대학교수개발의 주요지표 분석과 교수개발에 대한 평생학습원리 적용의 기대효과" 한국교육학회 42 (42): 615-651, 2004

26 민경찬, "대학 교육 개혁의 과제와 지향" 17-27, 2008

27 이성호, "교육과정론" 양서원 2009

28 정미경, "교원양성교육에서의 좋은 수업에 대한 예비교사의 인식" 한국교육과정학회 25 (25): 247-264, 2007

29 李仁孝, "人文系 高等學校 敎職文化 연구" 서울대학교 1990

30 이용숙, "‘우수수업 상’ 수상 교수의 수업유형과 특성에 대한 문화기술적 연구*" 한국교육방법학회 23 (23): 175-211, 2011

31 안지혜, "‘성공적 대학 수업’의 장점 및 개선점에 대한 교수, 학생의인식 분석 연구" 13 : 69-94, 2010

32 Bartlett, T., "What makes a teacher great" 50 (50): 8-10, 2003

33 Sanacore, J., "Using study groups to create a professional community" 37 (37): 62-66, 1993

34 Feldman, K. A., "The superior college teacher from the student's view" 5 : 243-288, 1976

35 Gibbs, G., "The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students" 5 (5): 87-100, 2004

36 Brophy, J., "Teaching. Educational practices series (Monograph No.1)"

37 Kraft, R. G., "Teaching excellence and the inner life of faculty" 32 (32): 48-52, 2000

38 Johnson-Farmer, B, J., "Teaching excellence : What great teachers teach us" 25 (25): 267-272, 2009

39 Cramer, G., "Teacher study groups for professional development" Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation 1996

40 Paulsen, M. B., "Taking teaching seriously: Meeting the challenge of instructional improvement" The George Washington University 1995

41 Berk, R. A., "Survey of 12 strategies to measure teaching effectiveness" 17 (17): 48-62, 2005

42 Cravens, T., "Students' perceptions of the characteristics of teaching excellence"

43 Saroyan, A., "Rethinking teaching in higher education: From a course design workshop to a faculty development framework" Stylus publishing 2004

44 Leslie, D. W., "Resolving the dispute : Teaching is academe's core value" 73 (73): 49-73, 2002

45 Trigwell, K., "Relations between teachers'approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning" 37 : 57-70, 1999

46 Merriam, S. B., "Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded form case study research in education" Jossey-Bass 1998

47 Patton, M. Q., "Qualitative research & evaluation methods" Sage Publications 2002

48 Rotem, A., "On the effectiveness of students'evaluative feedback to university instructors" 49 : 497-511, 1979

49 Jonassen, D. H., "Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm?" 39 (39): 5-14, 1991

50 Seldin, P., "New Directions for Teaching and Learning" 47-56, 1988

51 Gredler, M. E., "Learning and instruction: Theory into practice" Merrill Prentice-Hall 2001

52 Lee, Sungho H., "Korean Higher Education: Its Emergence, Development &Future challenges" Hakjisa Publisher 2006

53 Levinson-Rose, J., "Improving college teaching : A critical review of research" 51 (51): 403-434, 1981

54 Bransford, J. D., "How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school" National Academy Press 1999

55 Ambrose, S. A., "How learning works: 7 research-based principles for smart teaching" Jossey-Bass 2010

56 Brophy, J., "Good teaching: Insights from the work of the institute for research in teaching" Michigan State University 1987

57 Morgan, C., "Good Teaching and Learning: pupils and teachers speak" Open University Press 1999

58 Zimitat, C., "First year students' perceptions of the importance of good teaching : Not all things are equal" 29 : 386-392, 2006

59 Wildman, T. M., "Faculty study groups : Solving"good problems"through study, reflection, and collaboration" 24 : 247-263, 2000

60 Borich, G. D., "Effective teaching method" Prentice Hall 2000

61 Johnson, B., "Educational research: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches" Pearson 2004

62 Duffy, T., "Designing environments for constructive lerning" Springer-Verlag 1993

63 Lucas, C. J., "Crisis in the Academy: Rethinking higher education in America" St. Martin's Press 1996

64 Fink, L. D., "Creative significant learning experiences-An integrating approach to designing college courses" Jossey-Bass 2003

65 Stone, R., "Best practices for high school Classrooms: What award -winning secondary teachers Do" Sage Publications 2002

66 Zemelman, S., "Best practice :New standards for teaching and learning in America's schools" Heinemann 1998

67 이은실, "Best Teacher의 수업특성 : 포항공대 졸업생의 추천기준 분석" 12 (12): 91-118, 2001

68 이준형, "21세기의 대학사명" 서울행정학회 15 (15): 259-282, 2004