RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    행성의 공전 운동에 대한 초등 예비교사의 이해와 설명 모델 = Pre-Service Elementary Teachers’ Understanding of Planetary Revolution Movement and Their Explanatory Models

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107315420

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study investigated pre-service elementary teachers’ understanding of the planetary revolution movement of Mars and their explanatory models to show how the Sun-Earth-Mars system worked. An assessment item set using five celestial maps drawn from the Stellarium was designed to probe pre-service teachers’ understanding of the prograde-retrograde motion of Mars. Among 23 participants, only four showed scientifically accurate understanding of Mars movement and drawing correct explanatory models for the planetary movement. Even the pre-service teachers who construed correctly prograde and retrograde motions of Mars showed a clockwise movement model due to their intuitive perceptions of Mars movement data from the celestial maps. Pre-service teachers with poor understanding of planetary movement also showed weak explanatory models due to their limited observation or lower spatial thinking. Although the planetary motion is not an easy topic for pre-service elementary teachers, it can be argued if the alternative approach, such as using appropriate observational data of a planet and changing the frames of reference between Earth-based view and Space-based view, is employed effectively in teaching planetary motion, pre-service teachers can reach the upper level of leaning planetary motion in terms of the planet’s revolution.
    번역하기

    This study investigated pre-service elementary teachers’ understanding of the planetary revolution movement of Mars and their explanatory models to show how the Sun-Earth-Mars system worked. An assessment item set using five celestial maps drawn fro...

    This study investigated pre-service elementary teachers’ understanding of the planetary revolution movement of Mars and their explanatory models to show how the Sun-Earth-Mars system worked. An assessment item set using five celestial maps drawn from the Stellarium was designed to probe pre-service teachers’ understanding of the prograde-retrograde motion of Mars. Among 23 participants, only four showed scientifically accurate understanding of Mars movement and drawing correct explanatory models for the planetary movement. Even the pre-service teachers who construed correctly prograde and retrograde motions of Mars showed a clockwise movement model due to their intuitive perceptions of Mars movement data from the celestial maps. Pre-service teachers with poor understanding of planetary movement also showed weak explanatory models due to their limited observation or lower spatial thinking. Although the planetary motion is not an easy topic for pre-service elementary teachers, it can be argued if the alternative approach, such as using appropriate observational data of a planet and changing the frames of reference between Earth-based view and Space-based view, is employed effectively in teaching planetary motion, pre-service teachers can reach the upper level of leaning planetary motion in terms of the planet’s revolution.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 교육과학기술부, "초등학교 과학 5-2" 금성출판사 2011

    2 교육부, "초등학교 과학 5-1" 미래엔 2015

    3 교육부, "초등학교 과학 5-1" 비상교육 2019

    4 맹승호, "지구의 공전과 별자리의 겉보기 운동에 대한 초등학생들의 공간적 추론 발달 경로의 사례 연구" 한국과학교육학회 38 (38): 481-494, 2018

    5 맹승호, "순위 선다형 문항을 이용한 천문 시스템 학습 발달과정 개발 및 타당화 연구" 한국과학교육학회 34 (34): 703-718, 2014

    6 Richards, T., "Using kinesthetic activities to teach Ptolemaic and Copernican retrograde motion" 21 : 899-910, 2012

    7 Yu, K. C., "Student ideas about Kepler’s laws and planetary orbital motions" 9 : 1-17, 2010

    8 Plummer, J. D., "Spatial thinking as the dimension of progress in an astronomy learning progression" 50 : 1-45, 2014

    9 Calderón-Canales, E., "Elementary students’ mental models of the solar system" 12 : 1-17, 2013

    10 Sharp, J. G., "Children’s ideas about the solar system and the chaos in learning science" 90 : 124-147, 2006

    1 교육과학기술부, "초등학교 과학 5-2" 금성출판사 2011

    2 교육부, "초등학교 과학 5-1" 미래엔 2015

    3 교육부, "초등학교 과학 5-1" 비상교육 2019

    4 맹승호, "지구의 공전과 별자리의 겉보기 운동에 대한 초등학생들의 공간적 추론 발달 경로의 사례 연구" 한국과학교육학회 38 (38): 481-494, 2018

    5 맹승호, "순위 선다형 문항을 이용한 천문 시스템 학습 발달과정 개발 및 타당화 연구" 한국과학교육학회 34 (34): 703-718, 2014

    6 Richards, T., "Using kinesthetic activities to teach Ptolemaic and Copernican retrograde motion" 21 : 899-910, 2012

    7 Yu, K. C., "Student ideas about Kepler’s laws and planetary orbital motions" 9 : 1-17, 2010

    8 Plummer, J. D., "Spatial thinking as the dimension of progress in an astronomy learning progression" 50 : 1-45, 2014

    9 Calderón-Canales, E., "Elementary students’ mental models of the solar system" 12 : 1-17, 2013

    10 Sharp, J. G., "Children’s ideas about the solar system and the chaos in learning science" 90 : 124-147, 2006

    11 Sharp, J. G., "Children’s astronomy : Implications for curriculum developments at Key Stage 1 and the future of infant science in England and Wales" 3 (3): 17-49, 1995

    12 Sharp, J. G., "Children’s astronomical beliefs : A preliminary study of Year 6 children in south-west England" 18 (18): 685-712, 1996

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.21 1.21 1.35
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.34 1.28 1.783 0.5
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼