RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    에어리스 농구공의 기술적 특성에 대한 연구 = A Study on the Technical Characteristics of Airless Basketball

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110065073

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    PURPOSE This study aimed to identify the technical characteristics of a 3D-printed airless basketball and to compare its performance with that of a traditional inflatable basketball. In particular, the study examined how the lattice-structured design of the airless basketball influences key mechanical properties related to gameplay—namely rebound height, grip, elasticity, spin performance, and durability. METHOD The experiment was conducted from January to June 2025 at Y Gymnasium in Seoul with 20 adult participants (10 males, 10 females) who each had more than ten years of basketball experience. Two types of balls were tested: a 3D-printed airless basketball (TPU material, SLS method) and a standard inflatable basketball (Wilson Evolution, Size 7, 8.0 psi). Five performance parameters—rebound height, grip rating, elasticity, spin stability, and wear depth—were measured. Rebound height was assessed using a laser distance meter, spin performance using a high-speed camera (1,000 fps), and subjective evaluations using a 5-point Likert scale. All data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 27.0, calculating means and standard deviations and conducting paired-sample t-tests with a significance level of α=.05. RESULT The airless basketball demonstrated comparable performance to the inflatable basketball in rebound height (1.30m vs. 1.35m) and elasticity (4.1 vs. 4.3 points), while showing superior durability (wear depth: 0.05mm vs. 0.10mm, p<.01). However, the airless basketball scored slightly lower in grip (4.2 vs. 4.5 points) and spin performance (3.8 vs. 4.3 points), likely due to the discontinuous surface and micro-gaps inherent in the lattice design. CONCLUSION The findings indicate that the airless basketball provides consistent rebound performance without relying on internal air pressure, offering practical advantages such as reduced maintenance needs and enhanced durability. These characteristics suggest strong potential for use in both indoor and outdoor environments. Nevertheless, improvements in grip and spin stability remain necessary for high-level gameplay. Future research should focus on optimizing surface materials, refining lattice geometry, and validating performance across diverse environmental conditions.
    번역하기

    PURPOSE This study aimed to identify the technical characteristics of a 3D-printed airless basketball and to compare its performance with that of a traditional inflatable basketball. In particular, the study examined how the lattice-structured design ...

    PURPOSE This study aimed to identify the technical characteristics of a 3D-printed airless basketball and to compare its performance with that of a traditional inflatable basketball. In particular, the study examined how the lattice-structured design of the airless basketball influences key mechanical properties related to gameplay—namely rebound height, grip, elasticity, spin performance, and durability. METHOD The experiment was conducted from January to June 2025 at Y Gymnasium in Seoul with 20 adult participants (10 males, 10 females) who each had more than ten years of basketball experience. Two types of balls were tested: a 3D-printed airless basketball (TPU material, SLS method) and a standard inflatable basketball (Wilson Evolution, Size 7, 8.0 psi). Five performance parameters—rebound height, grip rating, elasticity, spin stability, and wear depth—were measured. Rebound height was assessed using a laser distance meter, spin performance using a high-speed camera (1,000 fps), and subjective evaluations using a 5-point Likert scale. All data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 27.0, calculating means and standard deviations and conducting paired-sample t-tests with a significance level of α=.05. RESULT The airless basketball demonstrated comparable performance to the inflatable basketball in rebound height (1.30m vs. 1.35m) and elasticity (4.1 vs. 4.3 points), while showing superior durability (wear depth: 0.05mm vs. 0.10mm, p<.01). However, the airless basketball scored slightly lower in grip (4.2 vs. 4.5 points) and spin performance (3.8 vs. 4.3 points), likely due to the discontinuous surface and micro-gaps inherent in the lattice design. CONCLUSION The findings indicate that the airless basketball provides consistent rebound performance without relying on internal air pressure, offering practical advantages such as reduced maintenance needs and enhanced durability. These characteristics suggest strong potential for use in both indoor and outdoor environments. Nevertheless, improvements in grip and spin stability remain necessary for high-level gameplay. Future research should focus on optimizing surface materials, refining lattice geometry, and validating performance across diverse environmental conditions.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼