RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보 SCOPUS

      Colonial Modernity and Rural Markets during the Japanese Colonial Period

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103826055

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Recent studies on Korean history during the Japanese colonial period have in general focused on ‘colonial modernity’ as their main theme. They have sought to analyze the characteristics of the modernity which Korea experienced, while paying special attention to the fact that while modernity should not be ignored,colonial rule should be perceived as having been a condition that contributed to the formation and reproduction of modernity; and that modernity, which was carried out at the global level, was variously and heteronomously experienced in individual regions. This fresh perception of colonial modernity has helped to bring about a meaningful change in the heretofore nationalism-centered study of the colonial era. Nevertheless, a great number of these analyses of modern elements have tended to concentrate on two spheres: industry and urban areas. To this end,although agriculture and rural areas accounted for a significant majority of industry and the overall population respectively, these elements were not identified as being crucial to the formation of the proper interpretation of colonial modernity.
      The study of the elements of the traditional lifestyle of farmers that were passed down from generation to generation is indeed a more simple one than the analysis of the new elements that were introduced. However, the rural markets, or changsi,which connected farmers to the external world, clearly exhibit the hybridity that characterized their lives during the colonial era. Colonial capitalism had the effect of worsening the conflicts between capitalists and laborers, as well as between landlords and farmers. However, the necessity to defend the nation against Japan’s dictatorial rule also had the effect of mitigating the inherent hierarchal differences between the various social groups. This hybridity was also reflected in the changsi markets that operated in rural areas.
      The commercialization of agriculture and the agricultural policy of the Government-General of Chosŏn had the effect of further exasperating the already dire situation which farmers faced. The direness of this situation forced many small-scale farmers to try to eke out a living by selling their agricultural wares at lower than market value prices. In this regard, the changsi emerged as the main sphere in which such exchanges designed to ensure farmers’ ability to continue to earn a living were carried out. The expansion of the changsi during the Japanese colonial period was motivated by the following factors. First, under the colonial capitalist structure, farmers needed the changsi, which they could freely enter, to maintain their small-scale farming household economies. Second, the changsi in rural areas functioned as networking markets that effectively connected these rural areas to the global market. The changsi played an important role in terms of the collection and exporting of the agricultural products and raw materials demanded by Japanese capitalism, but also functioned as windows for the distribution and sale of capitalist goods. Third, the changsi was a socio-cultural hybrid space in which Koreans, who were prohibited from participating in politics, could release their pent-up energy. To this end, the changsi conflicts reflected not only the confrontations and fissures that crisscrossed local society, but also the inherent politics of coexistence and alliance. Fourth, the changsi, in their capacity as a basic trading mechanism, served as collective goods which contributed to the activation of local economies. Furthermore, additional local development effects could be expected through the advent of other collective goods, such as financial institutions, agricultural product inspection centers and agricultural product stores,and means of transportation. In this regard, local residents, or simin, sought to attract changsi to their areas as part of efforts to ensure local development and reap the benefits of such development. This can be ...
      번역하기

      Recent studies on Korean history during the Japanese colonial period have in general focused on ‘colonial modernity’ as their main theme. They have sought to analyze the characteristics of the modernity which Korea experienced, while paying specia...

      Recent studies on Korean history during the Japanese colonial period have in general focused on ‘colonial modernity’ as their main theme. They have sought to analyze the characteristics of the modernity which Korea experienced, while paying special attention to the fact that while modernity should not be ignored,colonial rule should be perceived as having been a condition that contributed to the formation and reproduction of modernity; and that modernity, which was carried out at the global level, was variously and heteronomously experienced in individual regions. This fresh perception of colonial modernity has helped to bring about a meaningful change in the heretofore nationalism-centered study of the colonial era. Nevertheless, a great number of these analyses of modern elements have tended to concentrate on two spheres: industry and urban areas. To this end,although agriculture and rural areas accounted for a significant majority of industry and the overall population respectively, these elements were not identified as being crucial to the formation of the proper interpretation of colonial modernity.
      The study of the elements of the traditional lifestyle of farmers that were passed down from generation to generation is indeed a more simple one than the analysis of the new elements that were introduced. However, the rural markets, or changsi,which connected farmers to the external world, clearly exhibit the hybridity that characterized their lives during the colonial era. Colonial capitalism had the effect of worsening the conflicts between capitalists and laborers, as well as between landlords and farmers. However, the necessity to defend the nation against Japan’s dictatorial rule also had the effect of mitigating the inherent hierarchal differences between the various social groups. This hybridity was also reflected in the changsi markets that operated in rural areas.
      The commercialization of agriculture and the agricultural policy of the Government-General of Chosŏn had the effect of further exasperating the already dire situation which farmers faced. The direness of this situation forced many small-scale farmers to try to eke out a living by selling their agricultural wares at lower than market value prices. In this regard, the changsi emerged as the main sphere in which such exchanges designed to ensure farmers’ ability to continue to earn a living were carried out. The expansion of the changsi during the Japanese colonial period was motivated by the following factors. First, under the colonial capitalist structure, farmers needed the changsi, which they could freely enter, to maintain their small-scale farming household economies. Second, the changsi in rural areas functioned as networking markets that effectively connected these rural areas to the global market. The changsi played an important role in terms of the collection and exporting of the agricultural products and raw materials demanded by Japanese capitalism, but also functioned as windows for the distribution and sale of capitalist goods. Third, the changsi was a socio-cultural hybrid space in which Koreans, who were prohibited from participating in politics, could release their pent-up energy. To this end, the changsi conflicts reflected not only the confrontations and fissures that crisscrossed local society, but also the inherent politics of coexistence and alliance. Fourth, the changsi, in their capacity as a basic trading mechanism, served as collective goods which contributed to the activation of local economies. Furthermore, additional local development effects could be expected through the advent of other collective goods, such as financial institutions, agricultural product inspection centers and agricultural product stores,and means of transportation. In this regard, local residents, or simin, sought to attract changsi to their areas as part of efforts to ensure local development and reap the benefits of such development. This can be ...

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 조형근, "주체성의 관점에서 본 일제시기 장시의 갈등 『 허영란, 』일제시기 장시 연구: 5일장의 변동과 지역주민『(2009, 역사비평사) 』" 한국역사연구회 (73) : 303-331, 2009

      2 조형근, "식민지기 정기시장의 성장 원인 - 경제적 요인과 비경제적 요인의 구별을 위하여" 한국사회사학회 (76) : 267-297, 2007

      3 Matsuda Toshihiko, "日本の朝鮮植民地支配と警察-1905~1945年" Azekura shobo 184-185, 2009

      4 Hur Young-ran, "Viewing the history of everyday life during the Japanese colonial period and the public" 20 : 132-133, 2008

      5 Lee Hun-chang, "The structure of farming household management and the monetary economy during the final period of the Taehan Empire – early Japanese colonial period. in: The Land System during the Taehan Empire" Minumsa 243-, 1990

      6 Hur Young-ran, "The reorganization of the wholesale and retail distribution structure in the southern part of Kyonggi Province during the 1910s" 2 : 1997

      7 Chung Seungmo, "The regular market system and the structure of local society in rural areas" 3 : 1983

      8 Hur Young-ran, "The modernity and coloniality of commerce during the Japanese colonial period" 27 : 1994

      9 Kim Sung-hoon, "The institutions and functions of Korean rural markets" National Agricultural Economics Research Institute 141-, 1977

      10 Hur Young-ran, "The Study of Marketplaces during the Japanese Colonial Era –Changes in the 5-day market and local residents" Yoksa pipyongsa 245-250, 2009

      1 조형근, "주체성의 관점에서 본 일제시기 장시의 갈등 『 허영란, 』일제시기 장시 연구: 5일장의 변동과 지역주민『(2009, 역사비평사) 』" 한국역사연구회 (73) : 303-331, 2009

      2 조형근, "식민지기 정기시장의 성장 원인 - 경제적 요인과 비경제적 요인의 구별을 위하여" 한국사회사학회 (76) : 267-297, 2007

      3 Matsuda Toshihiko, "日本の朝鮮植民地支配と警察-1905~1945年" Azekura shobo 184-185, 2009

      4 Hur Young-ran, "Viewing the history of everyday life during the Japanese colonial period and the public" 20 : 132-133, 2008

      5 Lee Hun-chang, "The structure of farming household management and the monetary economy during the final period of the Taehan Empire – early Japanese colonial period. in: The Land System during the Taehan Empire" Minumsa 243-, 1990

      6 Hur Young-ran, "The reorganization of the wholesale and retail distribution structure in the southern part of Kyonggi Province during the 1910s" 2 : 1997

      7 Chung Seungmo, "The regular market system and the structure of local society in rural areas" 3 : 1983

      8 Hur Young-ran, "The modernity and coloniality of commerce during the Japanese colonial period" 27 : 1994

      9 Kim Sung-hoon, "The institutions and functions of Korean rural markets" National Agricultural Economics Research Institute 141-, 1977

      10 Hur Young-ran, "The Study of Marketplaces during the Japanese Colonial Era –Changes in the 5-day market and local residents" Yoksa pipyongsa 245-250, 2009

      11 Ahn Byung-jik, "The Farmers of Matchil" Ilchogak 139-140, 2001

      12 Yun Hae-dong, "The Colonial Gray Zone of a Colony: A criticism of Korean Modernity and colonialism" Yoksa pipyongsa 2003

      13 Yun Haedong, "The Colonial Gray Zone" Yoksa pipyongsa 2003

      14 Chung Seungmo, "Social History of the Marketplace" Ungjin Publishing 1992

      15 Lee Muyoung, "Slaves of the earth" Review of Humanities 1940

      16 Yun Hae-dong, "Review of Modernity 1·2" Yoksa pipyongsa 2006

      17 Kim Dong No, "Prologue of Modernity and Colonization" Changbi 183-, 2009

      18 Eric R. Wolf, "Peasants" Chongnyonsa 75-, 1978

      19 Hur Young-ran, "Market policy during the Japanese colonial era and changes in the nature of the commerce conducted through traditional markets" Seoul National University 309-310, 1994

      20 Hur Young-ran, "Korean perceptions of Japan and colonial modernity during the period spanning from the opening of the three ports to the Japanese colonial period. in: Korean Modern and Contemporary Politics and Japan I" Sonin 337-340, 2010

      21 Harry Harootunian, "History's Disquiet : Modernity, Cultural Practice and the Question of Everyday Life" Humanist Books 139-147, 2006

      22 Kong Cheuk, "Daily Life in the Colony: Control and Crevices" Munhwa kwahaksa 2006

      23 Hur Young-ran, "Criticism of the improvements rendered to public life. in: Japanese Colonial Rule and Colonial Modernity" Northeast Asian History Foundation 287-288, 2009

      24 Cho Hyung Keun, "Conflicts within traditional markets during the Japanese colonial period and the changes in social relations" Seoul National University 2005

      25 Cho Seok Gon, "Colonial modernization and the change in the nature of peasant movements during the Japanese colonial period" 41 : 211-212, 2007

      26 Lee Kyung Ran, "Colonial modernity and peasants’ lives as viewed from the agricultural novels produced during the 1930s. in: JapaneseColonial Rule and Public Life" Hyean 2004

      27 Gi-Wook Shin, "Colonial Modernity In Korea" Samin 2006

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.08 0.08 0.07
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.06 0.05 0.549 0.02
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼