RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    전세대출 보증 확대가 규제효과를 감쇄시키는가? - 서울 25개구 패널분석을 통한 정책수단 간 상쇄의 실증 - = Jeonse Loan Guarantee Expansion and the Effectiveness of Housing Price Regulation - Evidence of a Policy-Instrument Trade-Off across Seoul’s 25 Districts -

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110392292

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    During the Moon Jae-in administration, housing price regulations and the expansion of Jeonse loan guarantees were implemented simultaneously. However, the interaction between these two policy instruments has received limited empirical attention. This study examines whether the expansion of Jeonse loan guarantees structurally weakened the effectiveness of housing price regulations in Seoul’s apartment market. We analyze a strongly balanced monthly panel of Seoul’s 25 districts over 89 months, from January 2015 to May 2022, using an exposure-based, continuous-treatment difference-in-differences design combined with a shift-share (Bartik) identification strategy. Jeonse loan exposure, constructed by interacting nationwide guarantee balances with district-level shares of Jeonse households, is used as the moderating variable. The results show that the expansion of Jeonse loan guarantees significantly attenuated the price-dampening effect of housing price regulations. Conditional marginal-effects analysis further indicates that this attenuation was more pronounced in districts with higher shares of Jeonse households. Identification checks, including event-study analysis, pre-trend tests, and tests of the correlates of exposure shares, support the plausibility of the identification strategy. Robustness checks using alternative exposure shares, fixed-effects specifications, and sample periods also confirm the stability of the main findings. These findings suggest that the simultaneous implementation of price-suppressing regulations and liquidity-expanding Jeonse loan guarantees created a trade-off between policy instruments. They underscore the need for ex ante policy-consistency reviews, stronger cross-ministerial coordination, and systematic management of guarantee volumes.
    번역하기

    During the Moon Jae-in administration, housing price regulations and the expansion of Jeonse loan guarantees were implemented simultaneously. However, the interaction between these two policy instruments has received limited empirical attention. This ...

    During the Moon Jae-in administration, housing price regulations and the expansion of Jeonse loan guarantees were implemented simultaneously. However, the interaction between these two policy instruments has received limited empirical attention. This study examines whether the expansion of Jeonse loan guarantees structurally weakened the effectiveness of housing price regulations in Seoul’s apartment market. We analyze a strongly balanced monthly panel of Seoul’s 25 districts over 89 months, from January 2015 to May 2022, using an exposure-based, continuous-treatment difference-in-differences design combined with a shift-share (Bartik) identification strategy. Jeonse loan exposure, constructed by interacting nationwide guarantee balances with district-level shares of Jeonse households, is used as the moderating variable. The results show that the expansion of Jeonse loan guarantees significantly attenuated the price-dampening effect of housing price regulations. Conditional marginal-effects analysis further indicates that this attenuation was more pronounced in districts with higher shares of Jeonse households. Identification checks, including event-study analysis, pre-trend tests, and tests of the correlates of exposure shares, support the plausibility of the identification strategy. Robustness checks using alternative exposure shares, fixed-effects specifications, and sample periods also confirm the stability of the main findings. These findings suggest that the simultaneous implementation of price-suppressing regulations and liquidity-expanding Jeonse loan guarantees created a trade-off between policy instruments. They underscore the need for ex ante policy-consistency reviews, stronger cross-ministerial coordination, and systematic management of guarantee volumes.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼