RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      2015 및 2022 개정 중학교 영어과 교육과정 진술의 의미연결망 비교 분석 : <목표> 및 <성취기준> 진술을 중심으로 = A Comparative Semantic Network Analysis of the 2015 and 2022 Revised Middle School English Curricula : Focusig on Goals and Achievement Standards

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110047183

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study aims to compare and analyze the goals and achievement standards in the 2015 and 2022 revised middle school English curricula. To examine the unique functions and interrelationships of these two components, a semantic network analysis was conducted, complemented by frequency and centrality analyses to enhance objectivity. The results reveal that, in the semantic network of the goal statements in the 2015 curriculum, English-ability-understanding formed the core structure, whereas in the 2022 curriculum, English-communication-learning-goal emerged as the central structure. This suggests that while the 2015 curriculum emphasized the development of English proficiency and comprehension, the 2022 curriculum set as its primary goal the learning of English as a means of communication. Regarding the achievement standards, both curricula centered their semantic networks around “familiar topics”; but the 2015 curriculum displayed a structure expanding from a central network, while the 2022 curriculum formed more diverse networks that encompassed linguistic materials, psychological states, character descriptions, and attitudes. We hope that this study will stimulate in-depth discussions on the organization of components and the formulation of statements in future curriculum revisions, contributing to the development of curricula that ensure validity from both subject-matter and learner perspectives.
      번역하기

      This study aims to compare and analyze the goals and achievement standards in the 2015 and 2022 revised middle school English curricula. To examine the unique functions and interrelationships of these two components, a semantic network analysis was co...

      This study aims to compare and analyze the goals and achievement standards in the 2015 and 2022 revised middle school English curricula. To examine the unique functions and interrelationships of these two components, a semantic network analysis was conducted, complemented by frequency and centrality analyses to enhance objectivity. The results reveal that, in the semantic network of the goal statements in the 2015 curriculum, English-ability-understanding formed the core structure, whereas in the 2022 curriculum, English-communication-learning-goal emerged as the central structure. This suggests that while the 2015 curriculum emphasized the development of English proficiency and comprehension, the 2022 curriculum set as its primary goal the learning of English as a means of communication. Regarding the achievement standards, both curricula centered their semantic networks around “familiar topics”; but the 2015 curriculum displayed a structure expanding from a central network, while the 2022 curriculum formed more diverse networks that encompassed linguistic materials, psychological states, character descriptions, and attitudes. We hope that this study will stimulate in-depth discussions on the organization of components and the formulation of statements in future curriculum revisions, contributing to the development of curricula that ensure validity from both subject-matter and learner perspectives.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼