RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    개성공단사업의 현황, 정책적 함의와 개선과제 = A Study on Current Status, Policy Implications and Improvement for Gaeseong Industrial Complex

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101892406

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Gaeseong Industrial Complex(GIC) is a complementary and mutually beneficial inter-Korean economic cooperation project, combining South Korea’s capital and technology with North Korea’s labor and land resources. GIC is virtually jointly managed and operated by the two Koreas based on official agreements signed between South Korean industrial developers including Hyundai Asan and Korea Land and Housing Corporation(LH) and North Korea’s GIC-related organizations such as National Asia-Pacific Peace Committee and Committee for National Economic Cooperation. GIC is also in operation on the basis of inter-Korean institutional schemes established to protect invested assets and ensure safe entry, exit and stay of investors. However, GIC has inherent limitations since it is geographically located in North Korean territory and out of South Korea’s scope of control. In addition, North Korea’s several access blockage and suspension of operation based on political and military grounds significantly eroded stability and confidence of the complex. Nevertheless, GIC has never been fully shut down and continued its normal operation thanks to its strategic and policy value between the two Koreas despite a series of ups and downs. GIC has lots of implications in terms of policies: In economic perspective, GIC helps South Korean small and midsize companies find good manufacturing base and realized inter-Korean co-prosperity and economic cooperation. In political and military terms, GIC eased the North’s hostility towards the South and created peaceful mood between the two Koreas. In social and cultural policies, South and North Korean workers improved mutual understanding and restored the sense of national homogeneity. GIC also encouraged changes in North Korea. In process of preparing for unification, GIC is a inter-Korean economic community and a good example of unification preparation. On the other hand, GIC satisfies the needs of North Korea’s national policy: GIC earns foreign currency, helps learn advanced manufacturing technology and know-how on how to run an industrial complex, ensures livelihood of North Korean workers, enhances peaceful image to outside world, and creates favorable investment conditions for other economic zones. In a nutshell, GIC ‘creates peace on the Korean Peninsula and serves as a model for inter-Korean co-prosperity and unified economy.’ In this regard, GIC, which has solidified its status as a symbolic exemplary model for inter-Korean economic cooperation based on such strategic and policy values, must accomplish further expansion and development. However, a number of tasks lie ahead for further progress: 3C issues(Come-and-Go, Communication, Customs) which are regarded between the South and North Korean authorities as inter-Korean tasks to be addressed for ‘normal operation of GIC’ on August 14, 2013, globalization of GIC, reinforced protection of personnel safety, establishment and operation of Inter-Korean Commercial Arbitration Committee, stable supply of North Korean workers, companies’ flexible management on North Korean workers, strict compliance of law and regulations, etc. Active and sincere South and North Korean authorities-led negotiations and solutions are required to solve such diverse challenges in order to achieve further expansion and development of GIC rife with a variety of policy implications.
    번역하기

    Gaeseong Industrial Complex(GIC) is a complementary and mutually beneficial inter-Korean economic cooperation project, combining South Korea’s capital and technology with North Korea’s labor and land resources. GIC is virtually jointly managed and...

    Gaeseong Industrial Complex(GIC) is a complementary and mutually beneficial inter-Korean economic cooperation project, combining South Korea’s capital and technology with North Korea’s labor and land resources. GIC is virtually jointly managed and operated by the two Koreas based on official agreements signed between South Korean industrial developers including Hyundai Asan and Korea Land and Housing Corporation(LH) and North Korea’s GIC-related organizations such as National Asia-Pacific Peace Committee and Committee for National Economic Cooperation. GIC is also in operation on the basis of inter-Korean institutional schemes established to protect invested assets and ensure safe entry, exit and stay of investors. However, GIC has inherent limitations since it is geographically located in North Korean territory and out of South Korea’s scope of control. In addition, North Korea’s several access blockage and suspension of operation based on political and military grounds significantly eroded stability and confidence of the complex. Nevertheless, GIC has never been fully shut down and continued its normal operation thanks to its strategic and policy value between the two Koreas despite a series of ups and downs. GIC has lots of implications in terms of policies: In economic perspective, GIC helps South Korean small and midsize companies find good manufacturing base and realized inter-Korean co-prosperity and economic cooperation. In political and military terms, GIC eased the North’s hostility towards the South and created peaceful mood between the two Koreas. In social and cultural policies, South and North Korean workers improved mutual understanding and restored the sense of national homogeneity. GIC also encouraged changes in North Korea. In process of preparing for unification, GIC is a inter-Korean economic community and a good example of unification preparation. On the other hand, GIC satisfies the needs of North Korea’s national policy: GIC earns foreign currency, helps learn advanced manufacturing technology and know-how on how to run an industrial complex, ensures livelihood of North Korean workers, enhances peaceful image to outside world, and creates favorable investment conditions for other economic zones. In a nutshell, GIC ‘creates peace on the Korean Peninsula and serves as a model for inter-Korean co-prosperity and unified economy.’ In this regard, GIC, which has solidified its status as a symbolic exemplary model for inter-Korean economic cooperation based on such strategic and policy values, must accomplish further expansion and development. However, a number of tasks lie ahead for further progress: 3C issues(Come-and-Go, Communication, Customs) which are regarded between the South and North Korean authorities as inter-Korean tasks to be addressed for ‘normal operation of GIC’ on August 14, 2013, globalization of GIC, reinforced protection of personnel safety, establishment and operation of Inter-Korean Commercial Arbitration Committee, stable supply of North Korean workers, companies’ flexible management on North Korean workers, strict compliance of law and regulations, etc. Active and sincere South and North Korean authorities-led negotiations and solutions are required to solve such diverse challenges in order to achieve further expansion and development of GIC rife with a variety of policy implications.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이해정, "현안과 과제: 개성공단, 중국, 베트남보다 경쟁력 우월" 45 : 2011

    2 양운철, "남북관계 재구축 전략 - 개성공단 사레를 중심으로" 한국수출입은행 (가을) : 2013

    3 화정평화재단, "개성있는 개성을 만나다" 화정평화재단·21세기평화연구소 2008

    4 개성공업지구 법제연구회, "개성공업지구 법제의 진화와 미래" 경남대학교 극동문제연구소 2012

    5 홍양호, "개성공단의 현황과 향후 발전방향" 현대경제연구원 80 : 2013

    6 탁성한, "개성공단의 군사.안보적 함의" 15 (15): 2013

    7 이용화, "개성공단사업 평가, 전문가와 입주기업 설문조사" 현대경제연구원 2012

    8 이재호, "개성공단과 중소기업: 현황과 전망" 15 (15): 2013

    9 손광주, "개성공단개성공단 10년 평가와 새로운 남북경협 모델 모색" 2013

    10 송장준, "개성공단 활성화를 위한 정책과제" 중소기업연구원 2011

    1 이해정, "현안과 과제: 개성공단, 중국, 베트남보다 경쟁력 우월" 45 : 2011

    2 양운철, "남북관계 재구축 전략 - 개성공단 사레를 중심으로" 한국수출입은행 (가을) : 2013

    3 화정평화재단, "개성있는 개성을 만나다" 화정평화재단·21세기평화연구소 2008

    4 개성공업지구 법제연구회, "개성공업지구 법제의 진화와 미래" 경남대학교 극동문제연구소 2012

    5 홍양호, "개성공단의 현황과 향후 발전방향" 현대경제연구원 80 : 2013

    6 탁성한, "개성공단의 군사.안보적 함의" 15 (15): 2013

    7 이용화, "개성공단사업 평가, 전문가와 입주기업 설문조사" 현대경제연구원 2012

    8 이재호, "개성공단과 중소기업: 현황과 전망" 15 (15): 2013

    9 손광주, "개성공단개성공단 10년 평가와 새로운 남북경협 모델 모색" 2013

    10 송장준, "개성공단 활성화를 위한 정책과제" 중소기업연구원 2011

    11 개성공단기업협회, "개성공단 활동현황 보고"

    12 김양수, "개성공단 사업의 추진현황과 효율적활성화 방안에 관한 연구- 입주기업의 실태조사와 주요 경영상 애로요인 분석을 중심으로" 한국디지털정책학회 11 (11): 69-82, 2013

    13 조혜영, "개성공단 기업의 국내산업 파급효과 및 남북 산업간 시너지 확충방" 지식경제부

    14 개성공단 5년 발간위원회, "개성공단 5년" 통일부 개성공단사업지원단 2008

    15 김윤규, "개성공단" 한겨레 2014

    16 임을출, "가동중단 사태 이후의 개성공단 현황 및 평가" 2014

    17 통일부, "2015 통일백서" 2015

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.8 0.8 0.84
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.87 1.29 1.221 0.13
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼