RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    성과지표 특성이 평가의 수용성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Effects of the Characteristics of Performance Measures on the Acceptance of Evaluation

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A77051067

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The relationship between the performance measures and the acceptance of evaluation has been of importance not only in the academic field but in the business area. However, there had not been many studies on the factors which affect the goal core, that is, specificity and difficulty. The previous literature on the evaluation of measures has limitations in that the common and unique measures without suggesting the concept of shared measures are used. Thus, the purpose of this study is to examine the effects of the environmental characteristics of the goal setting on the result and acceptance of the evaluation, which is mediated by the characteristics of the goal core. This study further tests if there are any moderating effects from using the shared measures of performance.
    번역하기

    The relationship between the performance measures and the acceptance of evaluation has been of importance not only in the academic field but in the business area. However, there had not been many studies on the factors which affect the goal core, that...

    The relationship between the performance measures and the acceptance of evaluation has been of importance not only in the academic field but in the business area. However, there had not been many studies on the factors which affect the goal core, that is, specificity and difficulty. The previous literature on the evaluation of measures has limitations in that the common and unique measures without suggesting the concept of shared measures are used. Thus, the purpose of this study is to examine the effects of the environmental characteristics of the goal setting on the result and acceptance of the evaluation, which is mediated by the characteristics of the goal core. This study further tests if there are any moderating effects from using the shared measures of performance.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Abstract
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 이론적 고찰
    • 3. 연구설계
    • 4. 자료수집 및 실증분석
    • Abstract
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 이론적 고찰
    • 3. 연구설계
    • 4. 자료수집 및 실증분석
    • 5. 결언
    • 참고문헌
    • 저자소개
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 신두범, "최신행정학개론" 박영사 2003

    2 신철우, "연봉제의 성공적인 도입을 위한 목표에 의한 관리" 새로운제안 1999

    3 안재호, "성과관리제도 도입에 대한 지방공무원의 인식에 관한 연구:균형성과표를 대상으로" 국민대학교 2007

    4 지성권, "벤처기업 관리통제를 위한 BSC 활용과 기업성과" 939-967, 2005

    5 김경한, "목표관리제의 효과성에 대한 영향요인 연구" 한국행정학회 38 (38): 93-114, 2004

    6 남창우, "공공부문의 BSC수용성 및 조직성과의 영향요인 분석: 조직구성원의 인식을 중심으로" 한국행정학회 42 (42): 165-190, 2008

    7 넝쿨, "건설교통부 성과관리시스템 구축 보고서" 넝쿨 2005

    8 Duncan,J.W., "ganizational Behavior" Houghton, Mifflin Company 1981

    9 Boudreau,M.C., "Validation in information systems research:A state-of-the-art assessment" 25 (25): 1-16, 2001

    10 Kaplan,Robert,S., "Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System" 74 : 1996

    1 신두범, "최신행정학개론" 박영사 2003

    2 신철우, "연봉제의 성공적인 도입을 위한 목표에 의한 관리" 새로운제안 1999

    3 안재호, "성과관리제도 도입에 대한 지방공무원의 인식에 관한 연구:균형성과표를 대상으로" 국민대학교 2007

    4 지성권, "벤처기업 관리통제를 위한 BSC 활용과 기업성과" 939-967, 2005

    5 김경한, "목표관리제의 효과성에 대한 영향요인 연구" 한국행정학회 38 (38): 93-114, 2004

    6 남창우, "공공부문의 BSC수용성 및 조직성과의 영향요인 분석: 조직구성원의 인식을 중심으로" 한국행정학회 42 (42): 165-190, 2008

    7 넝쿨, "건설교통부 성과관리시스템 구축 보고서" 넝쿨 2005

    8 Duncan,J.W., "ganizational Behavior" Houghton, Mifflin Company 1981

    9 Boudreau,M.C., "Validation in information systems research:A state-of-the-art assessment" 25 (25): 1-16, 2001

    10 Kaplan,Robert,S., "Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System" 74 : 1996

    11 Atkinson,J., "Towards experimental analysis of human motivation in terms of motives, expectancies and incentives" Princeton 1958

    12 Locke,Edwin A., "Toward a theory of Task Motivation and Incentives" 3 : 1968

    13 Wright,Bradley E., "Toward Understanding Task, Mission and Public Service Motivation: A Conceptual and Empirical Synthesis of Goal Theory and Public Service Motivation" 2003

    14 Scott,J., "The measurement of information systems effectiveness:evaluating a measuring instrument" 111-128, 1994

    15 Hendricks,Menor,K.L., "The balanced scorecard:to adopt or not to adopt" 1-6, 2004

    16 Banker,R.D., "The balanced scorecard:judgmental effects of performance measures linked to strategy" 79 (79): 1-23, 2004

    17 Hoelter,J.W., "The analysis of covariance structures:goodness-of-fit indices" 11 : 325-344, 1983

    18 Kaplan,Robert S., "The Strategy-Focused Organization:How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment" Harvard Business School Press 2000

    19 Locke,Edwin A., "The Determinants of Goal Commitment" 13 (13): 1988

    20 Lipe,Marlys G., "The Balanced Scorecard:Judgmental Effects of Common and Unique Performance Measures" 2000

    21 Kaplan,Robert S., "The Balanced Scorecard-Measures that Drive Performance" 1992

    22 Browne,M.W., "Testing structural equation models" Sage 133-162, 1993

    23 Steers,R., "Task-goal attributes in achievement and supervisory performance" 13 : 1975

    24 Hayduk, L. A., "Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL:Essentials and Advances" Johns Hopkins University Press 1987

    25 Dilla,William N., "Relative Weighting of Common and Unique Balanced Scorecard Measures by Knowledgeable Decision Makers" 2005

    26 Erez,M., "Relationship of Core Self-Evaluations to Goal Setting, Motivation and Performance" 2001

    27 Wright,Bradley E., "Public Service and Motivation:Does Mission Matter" 2007

    28 Nunnally,J.C., "Psychometric Theory" McGraw- Hill 1994

    29 Berman,E., "Performance Measurement in U. S. Countries:Capacity for Reform" 60 (60): 409-420, 2000

    30 Hair,J.F., "Multivariate Data Analysis with Reading" Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River 1998

    31 Melkers,J., "Models of Performance-Measurement Use in Local Governments:Understanding Budgeting, Communication, and Lasting Effects" 65 (65): 180-190, 2005

    32 Roberts,G.E., "Maximizing performance appraisal system acceptance:Perspectives from municipal government personnel administors" 23 : 525-549, 1996

    33 Adams,J.S., "Inequity in Social Exchange" 2 : 1965

    34 Cavalluzzo,K.S., "Implementing performance measurement innovations: evidence from gorvenment" 29 : 243-267, 2004

    35 Drucker,P.F., "Harvard Business Review on Measuring Corporate Performance" Harvard Business School Press 1998

    36 Tubbs,Mark E., "Goal-Setting:A Metaanalytic Examination of the empirical evidence" 71 : 1986

    37 Shilts,M.K., "Goal Setting as a Strategy for Dietary and Physical Activity Behavior Change: A Review of the Literature" 2004

    38 Caroll,S.J., "Goal Characteristics and Personality Factors in a Management-By-Objectives Program" American Science Quarterly 1970

    39 Fornell, Claes, "Evaluating Structural Medels with Unobservable Variables and Management error" (18) : 39-50, 1981

    40 Wholey,Joseph S., "Evaluability Assessment, Evaluation Research Methods, Beverly Hills" Sage Publication 1977

    41 Greenberg,J., "Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluation" 71 : 340-342, 1986

    42 Hu,L., "Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis:conventional criteria versus new alternatives" 6 (6): 1-55, 1999

    43 Ivancevich,John M., "Changes in Performance in a Management by Objectives Program" 19 : 1974

    44 Locke,Edwin A., "Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation" 57 (57): 2002

    45 Niven, Paul R., "Balanced Scorecard- Maximizing Performance and Maintaining Results" John Wiley and Sons 39-70, 2002

    46 Schneiderman, A. M., "Balanced Scorecard Fail" 6-11, 1999

    47 Niven, Paul R., "Balanced Scorecard Diagnositics- Maintaining Maximum Performance" John Wiley and Sons 41-62, 2005

    48 서경훈, "BSC 도입 프로젝트 수행시 고려해야 할 주요 성공요인" 975-984, 2006

    49 Yearta,Shawn K., "An Exploratory study of Goal setting in theory and Practice:A Motivational Technique That Works?" 1995

    50 김원표, "AMOS를 이용한 구조방정식 모델분석" 사회와 통계 2006

    51 Latham,G., "A review of research on the application of goal setting in organizations" 18 : 1975

    52 Tucker,L.R., "A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis" 38 : 1-10, 1973

    53 Locke, Edwin A., "A Theory of Goal-Setting and Task Performance, Englewood Cliffs" Prentice-Hall 1990

    54 Rodgers,Robert,, "A Foundation of Good Management Practice in Government:Management by Objectives" 52 : 1992

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-04-01 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국데이타베이스학회 -> 한국데이터전략학회
    영문명 : 미등록 -> Korea Data Strategy Society
    KCI등재
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-06-22 학술지명변경 한글명 : Journal of Information Technology Applications & Menagement -> Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management
    외국어명 : Journal of Information Technology Applications & Menagement -> Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management
    KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.39 0.39 0.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.59 0.56 0.673 0.18
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼