RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    혁신행동의 선행요인과 결과요인에 관한 연구 = Antecedents and Outcomes of Innovative Behavior

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99678112

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Increasing global competition and rapidly changing technologies are the challenges organizations must address in order to survive. As these challenges continue to intensify, organization researchers highlight the integral role of innovative behavior on for organizations to remain competitive in an environment where the only constant is change. A large body of literature has examined the possibility that innovative behavior is affected by a variety of individual difference characteristics (e.g., demographic and biographic variables). Our investigation focuses on those characteristics that have received the most research attention-namely, individual`s cognitive flexibility. Next, we analyze contextual characteristics that have received attention in the literature, and explain how each characteristic might affect innovative behavior based on the intrinsic motivation perspective described earlier. The characteristic we examine here is time pressure. Although innovative behaviour is widely claimed to contribute to long term organizational effectiveness, the price that an individual worker may have to pay for taking an innovative approach has generally not been examined. Therefore, we hypothesizes that a worker`s innovative behavior influence on the team conflict positively and that work engagement moderates the relationship between innovative behavior and team conflict. In support of previous findings, the results based on the sample of 300 employees from fifteen firms in Seoul and Kyunggi province showed that time pressure increased the innovative behavior at workplace meaningfully (β = .130, p < .05) and cognitive flexibility increased the innovative behavior meaningfully(β = .399, p < .01). The innovative behavior increased team conflict significant (β = .190, p < .01). However the moderating effect of work engagement on the relationship between innovative behavior and team conflict is not demonstrated.
    번역하기

    Increasing global competition and rapidly changing technologies are the challenges organizations must address in order to survive. As these challenges continue to intensify, organization researchers highlight the integral role of innovative behavior o...

    Increasing global competition and rapidly changing technologies are the challenges organizations must address in order to survive. As these challenges continue to intensify, organization researchers highlight the integral role of innovative behavior on for organizations to remain competitive in an environment where the only constant is change. A large body of literature has examined the possibility that innovative behavior is affected by a variety of individual difference characteristics (e.g., demographic and biographic variables). Our investigation focuses on those characteristics that have received the most research attention-namely, individual`s cognitive flexibility. Next, we analyze contextual characteristics that have received attention in the literature, and explain how each characteristic might affect innovative behavior based on the intrinsic motivation perspective described earlier. The characteristic we examine here is time pressure. Although innovative behaviour is widely claimed to contribute to long term organizational effectiveness, the price that an individual worker may have to pay for taking an innovative approach has generally not been examined. Therefore, we hypothesizes that a worker`s innovative behavior influence on the team conflict positively and that work engagement moderates the relationship between innovative behavior and team conflict. In support of previous findings, the results based on the sample of 300 employees from fifteen firms in Seoul and Kyunggi province showed that time pressure increased the innovative behavior at workplace meaningfully (β = .130, p < .05) and cognitive flexibility increased the innovative behavior meaningfully(β = .399, p < .01). The innovative behavior increased team conflict significant (β = .190, p < .01). However the moderating effect of work engagement on the relationship between innovative behavior and team conflict is not demonstrated.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이문선, "창의성과 혁신행동의 관계와 집단특성의 조절효과" 한국인사관리학회 27 (27): 2003

    2 최만기, "조직혁신에 관한 연구모형의 개발과 연구명제의 설정" 27 (27): 1331-1360, 1999

    3 이지우, "심리적 임파워먼트와 조직지원이 종합병원 직원들의 혁신적 업무행동에 미치는 영향" 한국보건행정학회 13 (13): 46-68, 2003

    4 Poole, M. S., "central issues in the study of change and innovation, In Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation" Oxford University Press 2004

    5 Kanter, R. M., "When a thousand flowers bloom: structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations" JAI Press 10 : 169-211, 1988

    6 Perkins, D.N., "The possibility of invention, In The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives" Cambridge University Press 362-385, 1988

    7 McKinnon, D. W., "The nature and nurture of creative talent" 17 : 484-495, 1962

    8 Baer, M., "The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity" 91 (91): 963-970, 2006

    9 Janssen, O., "The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: a special issue introduction" 25 (25): 129-145, 2004

    10 Mednick, S.A., "The associative basis of the creative process" 69 (69): 220-232, 1962

    1 이문선, "창의성과 혁신행동의 관계와 집단특성의 조절효과" 한국인사관리학회 27 (27): 2003

    2 최만기, "조직혁신에 관한 연구모형의 개발과 연구명제의 설정" 27 (27): 1331-1360, 1999

    3 이지우, "심리적 임파워먼트와 조직지원이 종합병원 직원들의 혁신적 업무행동에 미치는 영향" 한국보건행정학회 13 (13): 46-68, 2003

    4 Poole, M. S., "central issues in the study of change and innovation, In Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation" Oxford University Press 2004

    5 Kanter, R. M., "When a thousand flowers bloom: structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations" JAI Press 10 : 169-211, 1988

    6 Perkins, D.N., "The possibility of invention, In The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives" Cambridge University Press 362-385, 1988

    7 McKinnon, D. W., "The nature and nurture of creative talent" 17 : 484-495, 1962

    8 Baer, M., "The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity" 91 (91): 963-970, 2006

    9 Janssen, O., "The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: a special issue introduction" 25 (25): 129-145, 2004

    10 Mednick, S.A., "The associative basis of the creative process" 69 (69): 220-232, 1962

    11 Koestler, A., "The Act of Creation" MacMillan 1964

    12 Schaufeli, W.B., "Test manual for the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale" Utrecht University

    13 Hulsheger, U.R., "Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research" 94 (94): 1128-1145, 2009

    14 De Dreu, C.K., "Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis" 88 : 741-749, 2003

    15 Semmer, N., "Stressbezogene Ta¨tigkeitsanalyse: Psychologische Untersuchungen zur Analyse von Stress am Arbeitsplatz" Beltz 1984

    16 West, M. A., "Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups" 51 : 355-424, 2002

    17 Ohly, S., "Routinization, work characteristics and their relationship with creative and proactive behaviors" 27 : 257-279, 2006

    18 Barron, F., "Putting creativity to work, In The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives" Cambridge University Press 77-98, 1988

    19 Mumford, M.D., "Processbased measures of creative problem-solving skills: IV. Category combination" 10 : 59-71, 1997

    20 Hammond, M.M., "Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis" 5 (5): 90-105, 2011

    21 Claessens, B.J.C., "Planning behaviour and perceived control of time at work" 25 : 937-950, 2004

    22 Jones, G. R., "Organizational theory: Text and cases" Addison-Wesley 2001

    23 Damanpour, F., "Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators" 34 : 555-590, 1991

    24 Mone, M.A., "Organizational decline and innovation: a contingency framework" 23 (23): 115-132, 1998

    25 King, N., "Managing innovation and change : A critical guide for organizations" Thompson 2002

    26 Janssen, O., "Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behavior" 73 : 289-302, 2000

    27 Shih, H.A., "Is innovative behavior really good for the firm?: Innovative work behavior, conflict with coworkers and turnover intention: moderating roles of perceived distributive fairness" 22 (22): 111-130, 2011

    28 Semmer, N., "Instrument zur Stressbezogenen Tätigkeitsanalyse (ISTA), In Handbuch der Instrumente zur Arbeitsanalyse" Verlag der Fachvereine Hochschulverlage 1998

    29 Janssen, O., "Innovative behaviour and job involvement at the price of conflict and less satisfactory relations with co-workers" 76 (76): 347-364, 2003

    30 Yuan, F., "Innovative behavior in the work place: the role of performance and image outcomes expectations" 53 (53): 323-342, 2010

    31 West, M.A., "Innovation at work: psychological perspectives" 4 (4): 15-30, 1989

    32 West, M.A., "Innovation at work, In Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies: 3-13" John Wiley and Sons 1990

    33 Bunce, D., "Innovation as a response to occupational stress" 6 : 22-25, 1995

    34 Farr, J.L., "Individual innovation, In Innovation and Creativity at Work" John Wiley and Sons 63-80, 1990

    35 Georgsdottir, A.S., "How flexibility facilitates innovation and ways to manage it in organizations" 13 (13): 166-175, 2004

    36 Jaušovec, N., "Flexible thinking: An explanation for individual differences in Ability" Hampton 1994

    37 Thurston, B.J., "Flexibility, In Encyclopedia of creativity" Academic Press 729-732, 1999

    38 Hannakaisa, L., "Factors associated with innovative climate: What is the role of stress" 15 : 203-213, 1999

    39 Oldham, G.R., "Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work" 39 : 607-634, 1996

    40 Miron, E., "Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other?" 25 (25): 175-199, 2004

    41 Van Dyne, L., "Differential effects of strain on two forms of work performance: Individual employee sales and creativity" 23 : 57-74, 2002

    42 Ramamoorthy, N., "Determinants of innovative work behaviour: development and test of an integrated model" 14 (14): 142-150, 2005

    43 Scott, S.G., "Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace" 37 (37): 580-607, 1994

    44 Ganesan, V., "Creativity, anxiety, time pressure and innovativeness among agricultural scientists" 3 (3): 40-48, 1982

    45 Baron, R.A., "Countering the effects of destructive criticism: The relative efficacy of four interventions" 75 : 245-255, 1990

    46 Elfering, A., "Chronic job stressors and job control: Effects on event-related coping success and well-being" 78 : 237-252, 2005

    47 Bunce, D., "Changing work environments: Innovative coping responses to occupational stress" 8 (8): 319-331, 1994

    48 Amabile, T.M., "Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity" 39 (39): 1154-1184, 1996

    49 Jehn, K., "A multi method examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict" 40 : 256-282, 1995

    50 Amabile, T. M., "A Model of creativity and innovation in organizations" JAI Press 10 : 123-130, 1988

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-02-29 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Zeitschrift fuer Wirtschaftswissenschaften -> Koreanische Zeitschrift fuer Wirtschaftswissenschaften KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.93 0.93 0.83
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.79 0.78 0.955 0.63
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼