RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    17世紀銘文白磁를 통해 본 官窯의 運營時期 -生産ㆍ消費遺蹟出土品을 中心으로- = The Characteristics and Production Period of Royal Kilns as Evidenced by 17th Century White Porcelain with Inscriptions Focusing on excavated remains related to consumption and production

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104693553

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    New data has confirmed that the production period of the Royal Kilns in Tanbeol-dong is 1606~1612, in Hackdong-ri is 1613~1617, in Sanglim-ri is 1618~1625, in Mohyun-myeon Yonginsi is 1626~1627, in Sundong-ri is 1640~1648, in Songjung-dong is 1649~1654, in Yusa-ri is 1655~1664, in Sindae-ri is 1665~1676, and in Jiwol-ri is after 1677. In addition, it has been proven that the production period of the Royal Kilns in Sanglim-ri ended in 1636, and in Sundong-ri ended in 1648. Therefore, it is clear that the production periods of Sanglim-ri, Sundong-ri,Sundong-ri and Songjung-dong do not overlap. These results also indicate that Royal Kiln sites were moved in the autumn rather than in the spring, and that the same firing sites were used in the spring and autumn seasons. However, the possibility of an interpretative mistake exists since a comparative analysis of the inscription data was not sufficient enough to confirm the specific months of production.
    There also exists the problem of interpreting the meaning of the numbers which appear in the inscriptions. Until now, although their meaning has not been clearly defined, it has been assumed that the numbers referred to the quantity of the firing pieces. However, white porcelain vessels have been excavated which have inscriptions containing characters such as ‘初’and ‘閏’,which most likely refer to dates, in conjunction with numbers. Such artifacts have been found in both production and consumption contexts in Songjung-dong and Sindae-ri. 乙卯閏五十八means the year of 乙卯(1675), the day of 18th, and ‘閏’s month of May. Also 五初三壬辰 means the year of 壬辰 (1652) and the 3rd day of May. Therefore these inscriptions were likely to have been written after glazing.
    It was also possible to identify that, from March to October in the year of 庚寅(1650) and from March to August in the year of 壬辰 (1652), white porcelain was consistently produced.
    This is evidenced by the inscribed dates on white porcelain vessles which were donated by Younghoon Kim, and which were excavated from the 5th and 6th Royal Kilns in Songjung-dong. There also exists a document which proves these facts, and which notes that a pottery master went to Gwangju and came back for firing in June, 1649.
    The presence of such inscriptions indicate that, although porcelain production was carried out in an unstable situation following the Imjinwaeran war, efforts to prevent the production of low quality porcelain and the loss of porcelain vessels continued to be carried out thorough inspection and supervision. This is regardless of the fact that the inscriptions written on the inside of the vessel foot differed according to the kiln.
    Among white porcelain vessels, those with inscriptions of the sexagenary cycle calender comprise a basic data set which can be used to study the form, patterns and change in pigment of early and later Joseon white porcelain. However, the exact location of the Royal Kiln of Jiwolri in 1680 and its production period have yet to be confirmed. If these missing facts can be confirmed through studies and investigation in the near future, this will bring us closer to understanding the ceramic culture of the Joseon Dynasty.
    번역하기

    New data has confirmed that the production period of the Royal Kilns in Tanbeol-dong is 1606~1612, in Hackdong-ri is 1613~1617, in Sanglim-ri is 1618~1625, in Mohyun-myeon Yonginsi is 1626~1627, in Sundong-ri is 1640~1648, in Songjung-dong is 1649~165...

    New data has confirmed that the production period of the Royal Kilns in Tanbeol-dong is 1606~1612, in Hackdong-ri is 1613~1617, in Sanglim-ri is 1618~1625, in Mohyun-myeon Yonginsi is 1626~1627, in Sundong-ri is 1640~1648, in Songjung-dong is 1649~1654, in Yusa-ri is 1655~1664, in Sindae-ri is 1665~1676, and in Jiwol-ri is after 1677. In addition, it has been proven that the production period of the Royal Kilns in Sanglim-ri ended in 1636, and in Sundong-ri ended in 1648. Therefore, it is clear that the production periods of Sanglim-ri, Sundong-ri,Sundong-ri and Songjung-dong do not overlap. These results also indicate that Royal Kiln sites were moved in the autumn rather than in the spring, and that the same firing sites were used in the spring and autumn seasons. However, the possibility of an interpretative mistake exists since a comparative analysis of the inscription data was not sufficient enough to confirm the specific months of production.
    There also exists the problem of interpreting the meaning of the numbers which appear in the inscriptions. Until now, although their meaning has not been clearly defined, it has been assumed that the numbers referred to the quantity of the firing pieces. However, white porcelain vessels have been excavated which have inscriptions containing characters such as ‘初’and ‘閏’,which most likely refer to dates, in conjunction with numbers. Such artifacts have been found in both production and consumption contexts in Songjung-dong and Sindae-ri. 乙卯閏五十八means the year of 乙卯(1675), the day of 18th, and ‘閏’s month of May. Also 五初三壬辰 means the year of 壬辰 (1652) and the 3rd day of May. Therefore these inscriptions were likely to have been written after glazing.
    It was also possible to identify that, from March to October in the year of 庚寅(1650) and from March to August in the year of 壬辰 (1652), white porcelain was consistently produced.
    This is evidenced by the inscribed dates on white porcelain vessles which were donated by Younghoon Kim, and which were excavated from the 5th and 6th Royal Kilns in Songjung-dong. There also exists a document which proves these facts, and which notes that a pottery master went to Gwangju and came back for firing in June, 1649.
    The presence of such inscriptions indicate that, although porcelain production was carried out in an unstable situation following the Imjinwaeran war, efforts to prevent the production of low quality porcelain and the loss of porcelain vessels continued to be carried out thorough inspection and supervision. This is regardless of the fact that the inscriptions written on the inside of the vessel foot differed according to the kiln.
    Among white porcelain vessels, those with inscriptions of the sexagenary cycle calender comprise a basic data set which can be used to study the form, patterns and change in pigment of early and later Joseon white porcelain. However, the exact location of the Royal Kiln of Jiwolri in 1680 and its production period have yet to be confirmed. If these missing facts can be confirmed through studies and investigation in the near future, this will bring us closer to understanding the ceramic culture of the Joseon Dynasty.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 한국문화유산연구원, "한국외대 용인캠퍼스 제2기숙사부지내 문화유적 발굴조사 지도위원회의 자료"

    2 국립문화재연구소, "창덕궁 금천교 발굴조사보고서"

    3 서울역사박물관, "종묘광장 인근유적 발굴조사(3차 현장설명회(종묘전교, 회동ㆍ제생 동천, 시전 지구))"

    4 한울문화재연구원, "종로 청진5지구 도시환경정비사업부지 발굴조사 지도위원회의 회의자료"

    5 박호승, "종로 청진1지구 유적 발굴조사" 2009

    6 한울문화재연구원, "종로 청진 12-16지구 도시환경정비사업부지 발굴조사 3차 지도위원회의 회의자료"

    7 "조선왕조실록"

    8 이화여자대학교박물관, "조선시대 마지막 官窯 廣州 分院里 白磁窯址"

    9 김영원, "조선시대 도자기" 서울대학교출판부 2003

    10 김혜인, "조선시대 궁궐유적 출토 자기 연구" 이화여자대학교 2009

    1 한국문화유산연구원, "한국외대 용인캠퍼스 제2기숙사부지내 문화유적 발굴조사 지도위원회의 자료"

    2 국립문화재연구소, "창덕궁 금천교 발굴조사보고서"

    3 서울역사박물관, "종묘광장 인근유적 발굴조사(3차 현장설명회(종묘전교, 회동ㆍ제생 동천, 시전 지구))"

    4 한울문화재연구원, "종로 청진5지구 도시환경정비사업부지 발굴조사 지도위원회의 회의자료"

    5 박호승, "종로 청진1지구 유적 발굴조사" 2009

    6 한울문화재연구원, "종로 청진 12-16지구 도시환경정비사업부지 발굴조사 3차 지도위원회의 회의자료"

    7 "조선왕조실록"

    8 이화여자대학교박물관, "조선시대 마지막 官窯 廣州 分院里 白磁窯址"

    9 김영원, "조선시대 도자기" 서울대학교출판부 2003

    10 김혜인, "조선시대 궁궐유적 출토 자기 연구" 이화여자대학교 2009

    11 田勝昌, "조선 관요의 분포와 운영체계 연구" 미술사연구회 (18) : 3-30, 2004

    12 "승정원일기"

    13 국립문화재연구소, "숭례문 발굴조사 1차"

    14 서울역사박물관, "서울탑골공원 원각사지 시굴조사 보고서"

    15 서울역사박물관, "서울의 도요지와 도자기"

    16 손설빈, "서울시 신청사 건립부지 내 유적-추정 군기시 부속건물지" 2009

    17 한강문화재연구원, "서울시 시청사 건립부지 내 문화재 발굴조사 3차 지도위원회 자료집"

    18 서울역사박물관, "서울성곽(회현지구) 멸실구간 발굴조사 현장설명회"

    19 명지대학교 부설 한국건축문화연구소, "서울교원복지회관 신축부지내 發掘調査 報告書"

    20 명지대학교 부설 한국건축문화연구소, "서울 청진6지구 유적 Ⅱ"

    21 명지대학교 부설 한국건축문화연구소, "서울 청진6지구 유적 Ⅰ"

    22 고려문화재연구원, "서울 중학동 유적"

    23 상명대학교박물관, "서울 종로구 한국불교태고종 전통문화전승관 신축부지 문화유적 발굴조사 보고서"

    24 상명대학교박물관, "서울 종로구 통의동 금융감독원청사부지 문화유적 발굴조사 보고서"

    25 한강문화재연구원, "서울 종로 송현동 49-1번지 일원 문화재 발굴(시굴)조사 지도위원회 자료집"

    26 한울문화재연구원, "서울 세운4구역 재정비촉진사업 대체영업장부지 발굴조사 지도위원회의 회의자료"

    27 한강문화재연구원, "서울 광화문광장 조성사업 부지 내 문화재 정밀 발굴조사 지도위원회"

    28 중앙문화재연구원, "사직1구역 도심재개발지구 내 서울 사직동유적"

    29 중원문화재연구원, "동대문 디자인플라자&파크 건립부지 내 발굴조사-지도위원회의자료(3)"

    30 조록주, "동대문 디자인플라자&파크 건립부지 내 발굴조사" 2009

    31 경기도자박물관, "광주 신대리 18호 백자가마터"

    32 조선관요박물관, "광주 송정동 5호ㆍ6호 백자가마터"

    33 한림대학교박물관, "강화조선궁전지(외규장각지)"

    34 윤용이, "韓國陶瓷史硏究" 文藝出版社 2001

    35 鄭良謨, "朝鮮白磁陶窯址"

    36 이화여자대학교박물관, "朝鮮白磁窯址發掘調査報告書-附 牛山里 9號窯址 發掘調査報告"

    37 張起熏, "朝鮮時代 17世紀 白磁의 硏究-廣州 分院窯址 出土品을 中心으로" 홍익대학교 1996

    38 국립중앙박물관, "景福宮 訓局軍營直所址"

    39 국립문화재연구소, "景福宮 興福殿址 發掘調査報告書"

    40 국립문화재연구소, "景福宮 燒廚房址 發掘調査報告書"

    41 국립문화재연구소, "景福宮 泰元殿址"

    42 국립문화재연구소, "景福宮 寢殿地域發掘調査報告書"

    43 국립문화재연구소, "景福宮 咸和堂ㆍ緝敬堂 行閣址 發掘調査報告書"

    44 국립문화재연구소, "景福宮 光化門址 및 月臺 地域 發掘調査(2次)"

    45 문화재관리국, "昌慶宮 發掘調査報告書"

    46 명지대학교 부설 한국건축문화연구소, "昌德宮 尙房址 遺構調査 報告書"

    47 문화재관리국, "昌德宮 仁政殿 外行閣址 發掘調査報告書"

    48 단국대학교박물관, "整備ㆍ復元을 위한 慶熙宮址 發掘調査 報告書"

    49 명지대학교 부설 한국건축문화연구소, "慶熙宮 資政殿 回廓 發掘調査 報告書"

    50 명지대학교 부설 한국건축문화연구소, "慶熙宮 泰寧殿址 建立敷地 發掘調査 報告書"

    51 명지대학교 부설 한국건축문화연구소, "慶熙宮 崇政殿 發掘調査 報告書- 숭정전지(숭정전 회랑 등) 건립 부지 발굴조사 보고서"

    52 명지대학교 부설 한국건축문화연구소, "慶熙宮 崇政殿 發掘調査 報告書"

    53 국립중앙박물관, "廣州郡 道馬里 白磁窯址 發掘調査 報告書-道馬里1號窯址-"

    54 이화여자대학교박물관, "廣州 朝鮮白磁窯址 發掘調査報告書-번천리5호ㆍ선동리2ㆍ3호-"

    55 이화여자대학교박물관, "廣州 上樊川里 9號 朝鮮白磁窯址 發掘調査報告"

    56 명지대학교 부설 한국건축문화연구소, "含春苑址 주변 유적 시굴조사 보고서"

    57 國立中央博物館, "京畿道廣州中央官窯-窯址地表調査報告書(解說篇)"

    58 國立中央博物館, "京畿道廣州中央官窯-窯址地表調査報告書(圖版篇)"

    59 鄭良謨, "京畿道 廣州分院 窯址에 대한 編年的 考察. In: 朝鮮白磁陶窯址"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2018-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.49 1.49 1.24
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.32 1.4 2.51 0.36
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼