RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    러일전쟁 전후 일본의 대륙정책과 테라우치(寺內正毅) = Teraouch and Japan`s Continental Policies in the Russo-Japanese War

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102575094

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    After gaining the victory of the Russo-Japanese War, Japan actively developed continental politics. The Triple Intervention had made Japan``s need for the foundation of continental advance more urgent and so made Korea a protectorate. Even after that, it was threatened again by the Triple Intervention which lead to the resolution of the executing the Korean amalgamation. Geographically speaking Korea was the perfect solution for Japan to overcome the geographical flaw of being an insular country, the lack of resources, and overpopulation. Korea, in this sense, provided Japan a basis for penetrating to the continent in order to ensure long-term industrial growth. It was the Yamagata Group``s Katsura cabinet which was based on the army circles of Joshu(長州閥) that vigorously promoted the continental politics. Army secretary Teraouch took charge of the crucial Korean amalgamation, which would have been the first outcome, and the cornerstone of the aggressive continental politics. He was the one to have lead the Russo-Japanese War into victory by repletion of the armaments after entering the Joshua am circle. After becoming the commander of Korean amalgamation, army secretary and the Korea Resident-General as well, he carried on the active annexation and constructed the structure of the ``politics of Korean Governor-General``. The ``Politics of Korean Governor-General`` of Japan was designated to efficiently control the fierce resistance and to make people accept the colonization under the recognition of the superiority of modern nation Japan. It was also to control the stability of the rule and to reform the Korean society. This was an exclusive colonial rule of Japan for Korea to overcome the geographical inferiority and to become a modern industrialized nation. Under the full support of the Japanese government, the ``politics of Korean Governor-General`` mean that Chosun area is under the sole influence of the Joshu army circle. The Katsura cabinet had preoccupied Korea as the basis of its continental politics. The ``politics of Korean Governor-General`` that represents characteristics of the colonial rule of Japan to Korea was designed in the sense of Japan``s continental politics of the Joshu army circle.
    번역하기

    After gaining the victory of the Russo-Japanese War, Japan actively developed continental politics. The Triple Intervention had made Japan``s need for the foundation of continental advance more urgent and so made Korea a protectorate. Even after that,...

    After gaining the victory of the Russo-Japanese War, Japan actively developed continental politics. The Triple Intervention had made Japan``s need for the foundation of continental advance more urgent and so made Korea a protectorate. Even after that, it was threatened again by the Triple Intervention which lead to the resolution of the executing the Korean amalgamation. Geographically speaking Korea was the perfect solution for Japan to overcome the geographical flaw of being an insular country, the lack of resources, and overpopulation. Korea, in this sense, provided Japan a basis for penetrating to the continent in order to ensure long-term industrial growth. It was the Yamagata Group``s Katsura cabinet which was based on the army circles of Joshu(長州閥) that vigorously promoted the continental politics. Army secretary Teraouch took charge of the crucial Korean amalgamation, which would have been the first outcome, and the cornerstone of the aggressive continental politics. He was the one to have lead the Russo-Japanese War into victory by repletion of the armaments after entering the Joshua am circle. After becoming the commander of Korean amalgamation, army secretary and the Korea Resident-General as well, he carried on the active annexation and constructed the structure of the ``politics of Korean Governor-General``. The ``Politics of Korean Governor-General`` of Japan was designated to efficiently control the fierce resistance and to make people accept the colonization under the recognition of the superiority of modern nation Japan. It was also to control the stability of the rule and to reform the Korean society. This was an exclusive colonial rule of Japan for Korea to overcome the geographical inferiority and to become a modern industrialized nation. Under the full support of the Japanese government, the ``politics of Korean Governor-General`` mean that Chosun area is under the sole influence of the Joshu army circle. The Katsura cabinet had preoccupied Korea as the basis of its continental politics. The ``politics of Korean Governor-General`` that represents characteristics of the colonial rule of Japan to Korea was designed in the sense of Japan``s continental politics of the Joshu army circle.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 신상준, "한일합병에 따른 조선총독부의 설치와 조선총독의 지위 및 권한에 관한 행정사적 연구" 1973

    2 정긍식, "한국근대법제사고" 박영사 2002

    3 손정목, "조선총독의 지위와 권한 한국지방제도자치사연구" 1992

    4 김운태, "조선총독의 지위와 권한 일본 제국주의의 한국통치" 박영사 1986

    5 유영익, "조선총독부의 구조와 기능" 1992

    6 정연태, "조선총독 데라우치(寺內正毅)의 한국관과 식민통치-점진적 민족동화론과 민족차별 폭압정책의 이중성-" 2005

    7 강창일, "일제초기 식민통치의 전략과 내용-조선지배의 원리와 관련하여-" 백산서당 1905-1919, 1999

    8 최석영, "일제의 동화이데올로기의 창출" 서경문화사 1997

    9 강동진, "일제언론계의 한국관" 일지사 1982

    10 도면회, "일제 식민통치기구의 초기 형성과정" 백산서당 1905-1919, 1999

    1 신상준, "한일합병에 따른 조선총독부의 설치와 조선총독의 지위 및 권한에 관한 행정사적 연구" 1973

    2 정긍식, "한국근대법제사고" 박영사 2002

    3 손정목, "조선총독의 지위와 권한 한국지방제도자치사연구" 1992

    4 김운태, "조선총독의 지위와 권한 일본 제국주의의 한국통치" 박영사 1986

    5 유영익, "조선총독부의 구조와 기능" 1992

    6 정연태, "조선총독 데라우치(寺內正毅)의 한국관과 식민통치-점진적 민족동화론과 민족차별 폭압정책의 이중성-" 2005

    7 강창일, "일제초기 식민통치의 전략과 내용-조선지배의 원리와 관련하여-" 백산서당 1905-1919, 1999

    8 최석영, "일제의 동화이데올로기의 창출" 서경문화사 1997

    9 강동진, "일제언론계의 한국관" 일지사 1982

    10 도면회, "일제 식민통치기구의 초기 형성과정" 백산서당 1905-1919, 1999

    11 박경식, "일본제국주의의 조선지배" 1986

    12 이성환, "일본의 간도문제 처리의 정치과정, 주변 열강의 한반도 개입 및 점령정책" 2006.2

    13 마쓰다 도시히코, "일본 육군의 중국대륙침략정책과 조선(1910-1915)" 2005

    14 신상용, "영일동맹과 일본의 한국침략 러일전쟁전후 일본의 한국침략" 역사학회 편 1986

    15 이승렬, "역대 조선총독과 일본군벌" 통 (통): 1994

    16 박영재, "근대 일본의 한국 인식 일본의 침략정책사연구" 역사학회 편 1984

    17 최문형, "국제관계로 본 러일전쟁과 일본의 한국병합" 지식산업사 2004

    18 井上淸, "條約改正-明治の民族問題" 1978

    19 朝鮮總督府, "朝鮮總督府施政年報" 1912

    20 北岡申一, "日本陸軍と大陸政策" 東京大學出版會 1978

    21 松下芳南, "日本軍閥の興亡" 2 : 1967b

    22 松下芳南, "日本軍閥の興亡" 1 : 1967a

    23 山邊健太郞, "日本統治下の朝鮮" 岩波書店 1971

    24 外務省 編, "日本外交年表竝主要文書" 原書房 上 : 1965

    25 大山梓 編, "山縣有朋意見書" 原書房 1966

    26 山本四郞 編, "寺內正毅關係文書-首相以前" 京都女子大學 1984

    27 季武嘉也, "大正期の政治構造" 1998

    28 三谷太一郞, "增補 日本政黨政治の形性" 1995

    29 山本四郞 編, "四內正毅日記-1900-1918-" 京都女子大學 1980

    30 黑田甲子郞, "元帥寺內伯爵傳" 1920

    31 海野福壽, "伊藤博文と韓國倂合" 靑木書店 2004

    32 권태억, "1910년대 일제 식민통치의 기조" 서울대학교출판부 2005

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-10-07 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국사회사학회논문집(1-50) -> 사회와역사(구 한국사회사학회논문집) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1998-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.09 1.09 1.12
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.16 1.11 1.712 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼