RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    제7차 초등학교 국어과 교과서 제재의 난이도 적정성 검사 -3~6학년 2학기 읽기 교과서를 대상으로- = On optimality text of how well Korean readers fit children in the elementary: with focus on graders from third to sixth

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100320436

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study verified whether reading materials were profit for learning to reading in reading difficulty with second semester Korean language textbooks from grade 3 to grade 6. I accessed this question with two tasks : one is telling main-ideas and details, and the other is performing given learning goals. And I evaluated the materials with 5 criterions : easy level, profit level(a little easy), profit level, difficult level, and very difficult level. The result of this study showed that about 80% of materials were placed in profit level(about 30% of ‘a little easy profit level’ materials and over 50% of ‘profit level` materials). So it seemed that almost reading materials were optimal in reading difficulty. But reading materials for 4th grade students had large deviation, we were able to know that they were less profit than other grades`. In tasks of `telling main-ideas and details`, 11.4% of materials were placed in `easy` level, and only 1.4% of materials were placed in `difficult` level. And, in tasks of `performing given learning goals`, 10% of materials were placed in `easy` level, and 12.8% of materials were placed in `difficult` and `very difficult` level. So, it seemed that reading materials have slight inclination to `ease`, when we regarded `a little easy profit level` to a `easy` level. This results were closer to students` reponses than teachers` or Korean language education experts` ones compared with preceding study. We could use this result for developing reading materials ahead.
    번역하기

    This study verified whether reading materials were profit for learning to reading in reading difficulty with second semester Korean language textbooks from grade 3 to grade 6. I accessed this question with two tasks : one is telling main-ideas and det...

    This study verified whether reading materials were profit for learning to reading in reading difficulty with second semester Korean language textbooks from grade 3 to grade 6. I accessed this question with two tasks : one is telling main-ideas and details, and the other is performing given learning goals. And I evaluated the materials with 5 criterions : easy level, profit level(a little easy), profit level, difficult level, and very difficult level. The result of this study showed that about 80% of materials were placed in profit level(about 30% of ‘a little easy profit level’ materials and over 50% of ‘profit level` materials). So it seemed that almost reading materials were optimal in reading difficulty. But reading materials for 4th grade students had large deviation, we were able to know that they were less profit than other grades`. In tasks of `telling main-ideas and details`, 11.4% of materials were placed in `easy` level, and only 1.4% of materials were placed in `difficult` level. And, in tasks of `performing given learning goals`, 10% of materials were placed in `easy` level, and 12.8% of materials were placed in `difficult` and `very difficult` level. So, it seemed that reading materials have slight inclination to `ease`, when we regarded `a little easy profit level` to a `easy` level. This results were closer to students` reponses than teachers` or Korean language education experts` ones compared with preceding study. We could use this result for developing reading materials ahead.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼