人格權에 關한 各國의 立法例 檢討 = Examination of Legislative Examples in Each Country on the Rights of the Personality

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

We value our own nature intrinsically, and possess so-called interests or rights to free expressions of ourselves. The interests may come from relationships with others, or may remain only in our own sphere. It is personal rights that protect our interests.
However, our civil law still fails to make positive provisions on personal rights, but abides by passive standpoints that violation of personal rights means a tort that meets basic requirements for justifying a claim for damages. In addition, with regard to general concepts on personal rights, majority opinions and judicial precedents in Korea consider Article 751 and 752 of Korean Civil Code just as cautionary and exemplary provisions for Article 750 of said Code.
In the wake of examining the legislative examples in foreign countries on the rights of the personality, what is secured as the general right could be known to be the Declaration of the Rights of Man approved by the National Assembly of France in 1789. Following its spirit, the thought of human dignity is being realized by which the provision of elucidation is put even in Article 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which was adopted at the United Nations General Assembly on December 10, 1948. There is no specified provision on the rights of the personality in France. However, it is the real situation of being still protected by the stipulation with saying that “each person has a right of the respect for its privacy” in Article 9 for the French civil law and by being stipulated in Article 16 of the civil law by the Law on Bioethics and Biosafety.
The ground of the positive law, which was approved on the general rights of the personality in Germany is starting from being prescribed ‘the declaration on the dignity of man’ in Article I, Chapter I and ‘the manifestation on free personality’ in Clause I, Article II for the German constitutional law (fundamental law). And, the enactment as the general rights of the personality can be raised to be Article 704 (currently Article 823). Meanwhile, in case of America, it is being addressed by being divided into the right of privacy, which is the moral benefit, and the right of the publicity, which is the property profit.
In case of Switzerland, it is composed of two laws such as Zivilgesetzbuch in 1907 and Obligationerecht in 1911, and the enforcement of the law began from January 1, 1912. Unlike the German civil law and the French civil law, the Swiss civil law is approving the general rights of the personality as one of the private rights.
In the meantime, Japan had ever been discussed the American right of privacy from the 1920s after being translated into the right of the secrecy or the right of the secret, but it was quite negative. And, an opportunity, which came to cause a big concern, starts from after a case of “宴の あと.” Regarding a legal method, the rights of life, the body, freedom, and pursuit of happiness in Article 13 of the constitutional law were being seen as the provision of the ground for the individual rights of the personality. However, the infringement on the rights of the personality started to be recognized as the illegal act, by introducing theories of Germany and America since then. The civil law of Japan is regarding this as illegal act given the infringement on absolute right called the right of the personality. Either a leading case or a doctrine sees this as illegal act when the act of infringing on benefit, which has value enough to be protected even if there is no violation on a right, is unlawful, and is addressing it as an issue of illegality. As for a method of relief given the infringement on the right of the personality, a right of claim for damages, and a right of claim for prohibition as a means of restitution, are being acknowledged.
In contrast to this, our country is being revealed demerits in each e

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 序
• Ⅱ. 프랑스
• Ⅲ. 獨逸
• Ⅳ. 美國
• Ⅴ. 스위스
• Ⅵ. 日本
• Ⅶ. 우리나라
• Ⅷ. 結
• 【Abstract】

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김일환, "한국헌법상 일반적 행동자유권 존재여부에 관한 비판적 검토" 2 : 163-,

2 김기선, "한국채권법각론" 법문사 1982

3 堀部政男, "프라이버시와 고도정보화사회" 청림출판 1995

4 임수현, "퍼블리시티권의 유효성과 그 한계에 관한 고찰" 연세대 2005

5 곽윤직, "채권각론" 박영사 2000

6 이은영, "채권각론" 박영사 1999

7 변재옥, "정보화사회에 있어서 프라이버시의 권리" 서울대학교 1979

8 양창수, "정보화 사회와 프라이버시의 보호" 1 : -505,

9 방석호, "전자상거래에 있어서의 프라이버시와 소비자보호" 2 : 345-365,

10 이재석, "인격권의 현대적 전개와 보호" 전남대학교 1995

11 지홍원, "인격권의 침해" 10 : 213-,

12 박철우, "인격권의 침해"

13 홍춘의, "인격권의 승인과 보호" 28 (28): 145-,

14 최종길, "인격권의 사법상의 보호-독일의 학설ㆍ판례의 발전을 중심으로-" 9 (9): 30-, 1965

15 홍춘의, "인격권의 보호에 관한 연구" 전북대학교 1990

16 박도희, "인격권의 보호법리와 그 적용의 한계" 한양대학교 2005

17 조일환, "인격권의 법적 승인에 관한 연구" 11 : 17-,

18 박도희, "인격권으로서의 프라이버시권과 퍼블리시티권의 법리(Ⅰ)" 18 : 200-201,

19 곽종영, "인격권에 관한 연구" 조선대학교 1992

20 곽종영, "인격권에 관한 연구" 조선대학교 1992

21 이근식, "위자료산정에 관한 연구" 연세대학교 1975

22 장재옥, "연예인의 성명ㆍ초상의 경제적 가치보호와 손해배상법의 역할" 27 (27): 103-,

23 조규창, "소유권침해와 위자료청구권-통설ㆍ판례에 대한 비판적 고찰" 4 : 141-,

24 제철웅, "민사법에 의한 인격보호의 역사적 전개- 특히 독일법을 중심으로" 24 (24): 249-,

25 이영준, "민법총칙" 박영사 44-, 1995

26 곽윤직, "민법총칙" 박영사 49-, 2002

27 고상룡, "민법총칙" 법문사 1990

28 김주수, "민법총칙" 삼영사 1996

29 김상용, "민법총칙" 법문사 1993

30 지원림, "민법강의" 홍문사 2005

31 김일환, "독일 기본법상 일반적 인격권의 성립과 발전" (6) : 215-,

32 권성, "가처분의 연구" 박영사 2002

33 フランス 判例硏究會, "私的生活の保護-破毁院 第1民事部 1985年 2月 13日 判決"

34 好美淸光, "權利槪念"

35 末川博, "權利侵害論" 岩波書店 1970

36 星野英一, "基本法學(1)" 岩波書店 1983

37 伊藤正己編, "名譽プラィパシ" 日本評論社 1972

38 五十嵐淸, "人格權論" 一粒社 1989

39 齊藤博, "人格權法の發展に關する 一考察" 78 (78): 105-,

40 高橋康之, "人格權の比較法的硏究(フランス)"

41 三島宗彦, "人格權の保護"

42 加蕂一郞, "不法行爲論" (22) : 125-126,

43 潮見佳男, "不法行爲法"

44 皆川治廣, "プライバシ-權の保護と限界論" 北樹出版 2000

45 Nimmer, "supra note 9."

46 W. prosser, "op. cit"

47 Bloustein, "ibid"

48 Wolfgang, "Zum Allgemeinen Problematik des Persönlichkeitsrechts"

49 Herbert, "Weiterentwicklungen in Rechtsprechung und Lehre zu § 823 Abs. 1 BGB"

50 Melvill B. Nimmer, "The right of Publicity"

51 J. Thomas McCarthy, "The Right of Publicity and Privacy"

52 W. O. Douglas, "The Right of People"

53 Prosser, "The Law of Torts 2"

54 F. C. von Savigny, "System des heutigen Römischen Rechts"

55 Walter Schmitt Glaeser, "Schutz der Privatsphäre"

56 정상기, "Publicity권에 관한 소고" 2 : 1995

57 Bloustein, "Privacy as on Aspect of Hman Dignity"

58 M. von Hinden, "Persönlichkeitsverletzungen im Internet"

59 F. Regelsberger, "Pandekten"

60 E. Bucher, "Natürliche Personen und Persönlichkeitsschutz"

61 K. Cosack, "Lehrbuch des Bürgerlichen Rechts"

62 Peter, "Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch und seinen Nebengesetzen Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch"

63 Haelan Laboratories, "Inc. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc., 202 F. 2d 866(2d Cir. 1953), cert denied, 346 U. S. 816(1953)"

64 Zacchini v. Scripps, "Howard Broadcasting Co"

65 N. C. Nipperdey, "Die Würde des Menschen"

66 Vlad, "Die Persönlichkeitsrechte und ihr Schutz im französischen Recht"

67 P. Eltzbacher, "Die Handlungsfähigkeit nach deutschen bürgerlichem Recht"

68 O. von Gierke, "Deutsches Privatrecht, Bd. I, Allgemeiner Teil und Personenrecht"

69 Josef, "Der Wert der Wahrheit in Schatten des Rechts auf informationelle Selbstbestimmung"

70 M. Herrmann, "Der Schutz der Persönlichkeit in der Rechtslehre des 16. bis 18. Jahrhunderts"

71 Dietwalt, "Der Grundrechtliche Schutz der Privatsphäre"

72 A. von Thur, "Der Allegemeine Teil des Deutschen Bürgerlichen Rechts"

73 Rudolf, "Das subjektive Recht im Gebiet der unerlaubten Handlungen"

74 H. Hubmann, "Das Persönlichkeitsrecht, 3. Aufl."

75 R. Reinhardt, "Das Persönlichkeitsrecht in der geltenden Rechtsordnung"

76 P. Schwerdtner, "Das Persönlichkeitsrecht in der deutschen Zivilrechtsordnung"

77 W. Prosser, "Califonia Law Review"

78 J. Kohler, "Bürgerliches Recht, Encyklopädie der Rechtswissenschaft in systematischer Bearbeitung"

79 An Answer, "39 New York Uni. Law Review"