RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    환경법원 도입논의와 관련한 법제적 고려사항 = Statutory Considerations concerning the Discussions on the Introduction of the Environment Court

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99917488

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Typically, environmental issues are complex, extensive, serious, and irreversible. In addition, remedy against environmental damage is highly likely to take lots of time and be defective as it is hard to prove whether environmental damage is intentional or out of negligence, what caused the damage and what is the effect of the damage, and how severe the damage is. As a result, legal action against an environmental issue tends to require lots of money and time and sometimes leads to unnecessary disputes among members of the society. The establishment of the environment court is one of the efforts to overcome the limitations of Korea`s legal remedy system while acknowledging and dealing with the uniqueness of environmental damage. In accordance with the Act, the environment court is established and is exclusively in charge of environmental lawsuits; judges in the environmental court also should be specialized in environmental lawsuits and therefore the time to complete the remedy against environmental damage will be greatly cut down. In this article, to understand discussions over the establishment of the environment court, we`ve talked about the definition of the environment, environmental damage, and environmental lawsuit, the unique characteristics of environmental cases which lead us to establish the environment court, and the point should be considered after the environment court is established. AO.
    번역하기

    Typically, environmental issues are complex, extensive, serious, and irreversible. In addition, remedy against environmental damage is highly likely to take lots of time and be defective as it is hard to prove whether environmental damage is intention...

    Typically, environmental issues are complex, extensive, serious, and irreversible. In addition, remedy against environmental damage is highly likely to take lots of time and be defective as it is hard to prove whether environmental damage is intentional or out of negligence, what caused the damage and what is the effect of the damage, and how severe the damage is. As a result, legal action against an environmental issue tends to require lots of money and time and sometimes leads to unnecessary disputes among members of the society. The establishment of the environment court is one of the efforts to overcome the limitations of Korea`s legal remedy system while acknowledging and dealing with the uniqueness of environmental damage. In accordance with the Act, the environment court is established and is exclusively in charge of environmental lawsuits; judges in the environmental court also should be specialized in environmental lawsuits and therefore the time to complete the remedy against environmental damage will be greatly cut down. In this article, to understand discussions over the establishment of the environment court, we`ve talked about the definition of the environment, environmental damage, and environmental lawsuit, the unique characteristics of environmental cases which lead us to establish the environment court, and the point should be considered after the environment court is established. AO.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이수진, "환경분쟁 해결을 위한 한국법원의 발전 방안" 2013

    2 박균성, "환경법" 박영사 2013

    3 홍준형, "환경법" 박영사 2001

    4 김동희, "행정법Ⅰ" 박영사 2011

    5 이재상, "신형사소송법" 박영사 2008

    6 이시윤, "신민사소송법" 박영사 2002

    7 Merideth Wright, "The Vermont Environmental Court" 한국환경법학회 2013

    8 George Pring, "Greening Justice: Creating and Improving Environmental Courts and Tribunals" TAI 2009

    9 Nicholas A. Robinson, "Courts and Sustainable Development: Judicial Foundations for the Environmental Rule of Law" 2013

    10 홍강훈, "(로스쿨) 객관식 행정법특강" 박영사 2012

    1 이수진, "환경분쟁 해결을 위한 한국법원의 발전 방안" 2013

    2 박균성, "환경법" 박영사 2013

    3 홍준형, "환경법" 박영사 2001

    4 김동희, "행정법Ⅰ" 박영사 2011

    5 이재상, "신형사소송법" 박영사 2008

    6 이시윤, "신민사소송법" 박영사 2002

    7 Merideth Wright, "The Vermont Environmental Court" 한국환경법학회 2013

    8 George Pring, "Greening Justice: Creating and Improving Environmental Courts and Tribunals" TAI 2009

    9 Nicholas A. Robinson, "Courts and Sustainable Development: Judicial Foundations for the Environmental Rule of Law" 2013

    10 홍강훈, "(로스쿨) 객관식 행정법특강" 박영사 2012

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.14 1.14 1.15
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.04 0.97 1.226 0.39
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼