RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      유엔기후변화협약 하의 기술-재정 메커니즘 간 기술지원 연계 방안 연구: 정책통합 이론에 기반하여

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107304252

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Under the United Nations Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), ‘climate finance’ and ‘climate technology’ are two important issues in terms of the support provided to developing countries. The Financial Mechanism was established in 1992 to provide financial resources, including for the transfer of technology, to developing countries for climate change response, and there are two operating entities, the Global Environment Facility (GEF) from 1992 and the Green Climate Fund (GCF) from 2010. To facilitate technology development and transfer support, the Technology Mechanism was established in 2010, and it consists of the Technology Executive Committee (TEC) as a policy arm and the Climate Technology Centre and Network (CTCN) as an implementing arm. Based on these organizational developments, there has been greater recognition of the overlap between the Technology Mechanism and the Financial Mechanism in terms of technology support to developing countries. This has led to agenda-setting on the ‘linkage’ between the two Mechanisms in 2015. Since then, various cooperative activities have been discussed and undertaken amongst the TEC, the CTCN, GCF, and GEF. Particularly, the CTCN, which provides technical assistance to developing countries, has collaborated with the GCF and the GEF in technology support. However, there has been a considerable contestation between developed and developing countries over the degree of linkage between the CTCN and the GEF and GCF. From this context, this paper attempts to analyze the current status of linkage of the CTCN with the GCF and the GEF on the grounds of policy integration theory. Focusing on substantive and procedural policy instruments that constitute one of the dimensions of the policy integration approach, this paper utilizes the consistency of policy instruments as an indicator of the extent of policy integration. For analytical targets, i) the CTCN’s Technical Assistance program, ii) the GCF’s Readiness and Preparatory Support Program, and iii) the GEF’s Global Project of the Poznan Strategic Program for Technology Transfer are selected. For each program, this paper examines how these programs are procedurally and substantively integrated under the three aspects of i) technology support procedures, ii) project proposal submission requirements, and iii) project selection criteria. The results suggest that a considerable level of procedural integration has been attained. However, from the substantive aspect, there are still inconsistencies among the CTCN and the GEF and GCF due to different approaches to financing. This paper concludes with policy suggestions on substantive adjustments of the CTCN’s technical assistance program to be better harmonized with the programs of the GCF and the GEF.
      번역하기

      Under the United Nations Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), ‘climate finance’ and ‘climate technology’ are two important issues in terms of the support provided to developing countries. The Financial Mechanism was established in 1992 to pr...

      Under the United Nations Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), ‘climate finance’ and ‘climate technology’ are two important issues in terms of the support provided to developing countries. The Financial Mechanism was established in 1992 to provide financial resources, including for the transfer of technology, to developing countries for climate change response, and there are two operating entities, the Global Environment Facility (GEF) from 1992 and the Green Climate Fund (GCF) from 2010. To facilitate technology development and transfer support, the Technology Mechanism was established in 2010, and it consists of the Technology Executive Committee (TEC) as a policy arm and the Climate Technology Centre and Network (CTCN) as an implementing arm. Based on these organizational developments, there has been greater recognition of the overlap between the Technology Mechanism and the Financial Mechanism in terms of technology support to developing countries. This has led to agenda-setting on the ‘linkage’ between the two Mechanisms in 2015. Since then, various cooperative activities have been discussed and undertaken amongst the TEC, the CTCN, GCF, and GEF. Particularly, the CTCN, which provides technical assistance to developing countries, has collaborated with the GCF and the GEF in technology support. However, there has been a considerable contestation between developed and developing countries over the degree of linkage between the CTCN and the GEF and GCF. From this context, this paper attempts to analyze the current status of linkage of the CTCN with the GCF and the GEF on the grounds of policy integration theory. Focusing on substantive and procedural policy instruments that constitute one of the dimensions of the policy integration approach, this paper utilizes the consistency of policy instruments as an indicator of the extent of policy integration. For analytical targets, i) the CTCN’s Technical Assistance program, ii) the GCF’s Readiness and Preparatory Support Program, and iii) the GEF’s Global Project of the Poznan Strategic Program for Technology Transfer are selected. For each program, this paper examines how these programs are procedurally and substantively integrated under the three aspects of i) technology support procedures, ii) project proposal submission requirements, and iii) project selection criteria. The results suggest that a considerable level of procedural integration has been attained. However, from the substantive aspect, there are still inconsistencies among the CTCN and the GEF and GCF due to different approaches to financing. This paper concludes with policy suggestions on substantive adjustments of the CTCN’s technical assistance program to be better harmonized with the programs of the GCF and the GEF.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 우창빈, "개발을 위한 정책정합성의 개념과 측정: 라오스의 교육부문을 중심으로" 국제학연구소 23 (23): 109-140, 2014

      2 UNFCCC, "What is Technology Development and Transfer?"

      3 TEC, "Updated evaluation of the Poznan strategic programme on technology transfer"

      4 UNFCCC, "United Nations Treaty Collection"

      5 Oh CW, "Trend of International Climate Technology Cooperation under the UNFCCC: Based on the 14th TEC Meeting and 9th CTCN Advisory Board Meeting in 2017" GTC

      6 GEF, "Transfer of Environmentally Sound Technologies: Case Studies from the GEF Climate Change Portfolio"

      7 Ederington, J., "Trade and Domestic Policy Linkage in International Agreements" 43 (43): 1347-1367, 2002

      8 Candel, J., "Toward a processual understanding of policy integration" 49 : 211-231, 2016

      9 UNFCCC, "Thematic dialogue on climate technology incubators and accelerators"

      10 Thomson, R., "The programme to policy linkage:The fulfilment of election pledges on socio-economic policy in the Netherlands, 1986-1998" 40 : 171-197, 2001

      1 우창빈, "개발을 위한 정책정합성의 개념과 측정: 라오스의 교육부문을 중심으로" 국제학연구소 23 (23): 109-140, 2014

      2 UNFCCC, "What is Technology Development and Transfer?"

      3 TEC, "Updated evaluation of the Poznan strategic programme on technology transfer"

      4 UNFCCC, "United Nations Treaty Collection"

      5 Oh CW, "Trend of International Climate Technology Cooperation under the UNFCCC: Based on the 14th TEC Meeting and 9th CTCN Advisory Board Meeting in 2017" GTC

      6 GEF, "Transfer of Environmentally Sound Technologies: Case Studies from the GEF Climate Change Portfolio"

      7 Ederington, J., "Trade and Domestic Policy Linkage in International Agreements" 43 (43): 1347-1367, 2002

      8 Candel, J., "Toward a processual understanding of policy integration" 49 : 211-231, 2016

      9 UNFCCC, "Thematic dialogue on climate technology incubators and accelerators"

      10 Thomson, R., "The programme to policy linkage:The fulfilment of election pledges on socio-economic policy in the Netherlands, 1986-1998" 40 : 171-197, 2001

      11 Peters, B. G., "The challenge of policy coordination"

      12 Lindblom, C. E., "The Intelligence of Democracy:Decision Making through Mutual Adjustment" Free Press 1965

      13 UNFCCC, "Technology Needs Assessment:Pathways for climate tech implementation"

      14 CTCN, "Technical Assistance: Status, Process and Criteria. 5th Meeting of the CTCN Advisory Board"

      15 CTCN, "Technical Assistance Request Form English version"

      16 CTCN, "Technical Assistance"

      17 Oh CW, "Results of the Climate Mechanism Meetings under the UNFCCC in 2018:Based on the 16th TEC Meeting and 11th CTCN Advisory Board Meeting in 2018" GTC

      18 GEF, "Report of the Global Environment Facility to the Twenty-fourth Session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change"

      19 UNFCCC, "Report of the Global Environment Facility to the Conference of the Parties"

      20 UNFCCC, "Report of the Conference of the Parties on its twenty-fourth session, held in Katowice from 2 to 15 December 2018. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its twenty-fourth session"

      21 UNFCCC, "Report of the Conference of the Parties on its twenty-fourth session, held in Katowice from 2 to 15 December 2018, Addendum Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its twentyfourth session"

      22 UNFCCC, "Report of the Conference of the Parties on its twenty-first session, held in Paris from 30 November to 13 December 2015, Addendum Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its twenty-first session"

      23 UNFCCC, "Report of the Conference of the Parties on its twenty-first session, held in Paris from 30 November to 13 December 2015"

      24 UNFCCC, "Report of the Conference of the Parties on its sixteenth session, held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010"

      25 UNFCCC, "Report of the Conference of the Parties on its seventeenth session, held in Durban from 28 Novermber to 11 December 2011"

      26 UNFCCC, "Report of the Conference of the Parties on its fourteenth session, held in Poznan from 1 to 12 December 2008"

      27 GCF, "Readiness and Preparatory Support Programme Proposal Template"

      28 GCF, "Readiness and Preparatory Support Programme Guidebook: A practical guide on how to prepare readiness proposals for the Green Climate Fund"

      29 GEF, "Project and Program Cycle Policy"

      30 GCF, "Project Preparation Facility"

      31 Tosun, J., "Policy integration: mapping the different concepts" 38 (38): 553-570, 2017

      32 Stead, D., "Policy integration in practice: some experiences of integrating transport, land-use planning and environmental policies in local government" 1-13, 2004

      33 OECD, "Policy coherence for inclusive and sustainable development"

      34 KIPA, "Policy Tool and Development Research for Enhancement of Public-Private Cooperation"

      35 Majone, G., "Policy Harmonization: Limits and Alternatives" 14-21, 2014

      36 European Commission, "Policy Coherence for Development: 2019 EU Report" European Commission

      37 GCF, "Options for support for technology collaborative research and development Addendum"

      38 Abreu, D., "On the Theory of Infinitely Repeated Games with Discounting" 56 : 383-396, 1988

      39 Spagnolo, G., "Issue Linkage, Delegation, and International Policy Cooperation" 1-19, 1999

      40 UNFCCC, "Introduction to Climate Finance"

      41 Oh CW, "International Climate Technology Cooperation Policy Trends under the UNFCCC" GTC

      42 GEF, "Implementing the Poznan Strategic and Long-term Programs on Technology Transfer"

      43 GEF, "Guidelines on the Project and Program Cycle Policy"

      44 GCF, "Governing Instrument"

      45 Scharpf, F. W., "Games real actors could play: positive and negative coordination in embedded negotiations" 6 (6): 27-53, 1994

      46 GEF, "GEF-7 Project Identification Form(PIF)"

      47 GEF, "GEF Update on Technology Transfer"

      48 GEF, "GEF Focal Points"

      49 GCF, "GCF/B.13/32/Rev.01: Decision of the Board - thirteenth meeting of the Board"

      50 GCF, "GCF/B.07/11: Decisions of the Board - Seventh Meeting of the Board"

      51 GCF, "GCF in Brief: Support for Technology"

      52 GTC, "GCF Utilization and Guidelines to Writing Proposals"

      53 GEF, "Funding"

      54 GCF, "Country Readiness"

      55 CTCN, "Collaboration with the Green Climate Fund, 11th meeting of the CTCN Advisory Board"

      56 UNFCCC, "Climate Technology Incubators and Accelerators"

      57 Oh CW, "Climate Technology Cooperation with Developing Countries in Response to the New Climate Regime: A Focus on the TNAs" GTC

      58 CTCN, "Climate Technology Centre and Network 2019 Annual Report"

      59 CTCN, "CTCN: Technical Assistance: Process and Success Factors" CTCN Regional NDE Forum Pacific SIDS

      60 GTC, "CTCN TA Guidelines"

      61 GEF, "CRITERIA FOR REVIEW OF GEF PROJECTS"

      62 CTCN, "Annex 1 National Designated Entities (NDEs) for the CTCN" Advisory Board to the CTCN

      63 GEF, "About Us"

      64 GCF, "About GCF"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2014-06-25 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> The Korean Society of Climate Change Research
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0 0 0
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0 0 0 0.09
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼