이 글은 모던 미국사회학이 사용한 지식 패러다임을 살펴봄으로써 그 발전과정을 살펴본다. 모던 미국사회학은 사회학을 진정한 과학으로 수립하고자 미학을 배제하였다는 점에서 고전 유...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
이 글은 모던 미국사회학이 사용한 지식 패러다임을 살펴봄으로써 그 발전과정을 살펴본다. 모던 미국사회학은 사회학을 진정한 과학으로 수립하고자 미학을 배제하였다는 점에서 고전 유...
이 글은 모던 미국사회학이 사용한 지식 패러다임을 살펴봄으로써 그 발전과정을 살펴본다. 모던 미국사회학은 사회학을 진정한 과학으로 수립하고자 미학을 배제하였다는 점에서 고전 유럽사회학과 어느 정도 유사하다. 하지만 고전 유럽사회학과 달리 모던 미국사회학은 경험과학을 비판하지 않았다. 오히려 경험과학을 사회학을 위한 최고로 우월한 지식의 패러다임으로 채택하였다. 모던 미국사회학은 미국의 영웅적 개인주의 정신과 잘 들어맞는 한도 내에서 도덕학을 긍정적으로 받아들였다. 또한 모던 미국사회학은 이론과학을 받아들였지만, 유럽과는 사뭇 다른 양상을 보여주었다. 유럽에서는 맑시즘과 구조주의와 같은 본질주의적 이론과학이 사회학을 포함한 지성계에서 지배적인 위치를 차지하였다. 하지만 미국에서는 본질 주의적 이론과학이 사회학적 담론으로 자리를 잡지 못하였는데, 주된 이유는 미국 지성계를 지배한 세속화된 과학관이 본질주의적 이론과학의 목적론적·비과학적 함의를 용인할 수 없었기 때문이다. 반면 초월주의적 이론과학은 목적론을 담고 있지 않아 모던 미국사회학에서 비교적 손쉽게 자리를 잡을 수 있었다. 경험과학과 초월주의적 이론과학이 서로 손을 잡고 모던 미국사회학에서 크게 성공을 거둔 것은 놀라운 일이 아닌데, 왜냐하면 뉴턴이 이미 경험과 합리적 추론을 종합하여 자신의 과학관을 제출한 바 있기 때문이다. 결국 모던 미국사회학의 패권을 잡은 것은 과학이었다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This article examines the development of modern American sociology in terms of the paradigms of knowledge it has utilized. Modern American sociology has excluded aesthetics from its horizon in order to establish itself as a genuine science, which is i...
This article examines the development of modern American sociology in terms of the paradigms of knowledge it has utilized. Modern American sociology has excluded aesthetics from its horizon in order to establish itself as a genuine science, which is in a sense similar to classical European sociology. Unlike classical European sociology, however, modern American sociology did not criticize empirical science; rather, it adopted empirical science as the primary model of knowledge. Modern American sociology positively embraced morality insofar as it fits in with the American spirit of heroic individualism. Moreover, modern American sociology adopted the model of theoretical science, but its mode is quite different from the European one where the essentialist version of theoretical science such as Marxism and structuralism prevailed in the academe including sociology. In contrast, the essentialist version of theoretical science did not take root in the American academe, the main reason being that the secularized view of science dominating the American academe could not bear its teleological, unscientific implications. Instead, the transcendentalist version of theoretical science was able to take root in modern American sociology relatively easily because it did not include teleological implications. Empirical science and transcendentalist theoretical science flourished together in modern American sociology, which is not surprising because Newton already presented the paradigmatic view of science that successfully synthesized empirical facts and rational reasoning. Thus, science assumed hegemony in modern American sociology.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 최종렬, "포스트모던: 모던에 대한 미학적 도전" 2 (2): 207-258, 2003
2 최종렬, "과학, 도덕학, 미학의 역사적 관계: 고대 그리스 사상에서 르네상스 휴머니즘까지" 4 (4): 267-339, 2004
3 최종렬, "고전 유럽사회학의 지적 모체:19세기 유럽 지성계의 지형" 한국이론사회학회 (6) : 35-81, 2005
4 최종렬, "고전 유럽 사회학" 한국인문사회과학회 29 (29): 139-170, 2005
5 최종렬, "계몽주의, 대항계몽주의, 반계몽주의" 한국이론사회학회 (5) : 123-181, 2004
6 Acker, Joan, "Women and Social Stratification: A Case of Intellectual Sexism" 78 (78): 174-183, 1973
7 Connell, R. W., "Why Is Classical Theory Classical?" 102 (102): 1511-1557, 1997
8 Alexander, Jeffrey C., "Twenty Lectures: Sociological Theory Since World War II" Columbia University Press 1987
9 Parsons, Talcott, "The Structure of Social Action: A Study in Social Theory with Special Reference to a Group of Recent European Writers, Vo1. 1 and Vol. 2" Free Press 1968
10 Berger, Peter L., "The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Garden City" Doubleday 1966
1 최종렬, "포스트모던: 모던에 대한 미학적 도전" 2 (2): 207-258, 2003
2 최종렬, "과학, 도덕학, 미학의 역사적 관계: 고대 그리스 사상에서 르네상스 휴머니즘까지" 4 (4): 267-339, 2004
3 최종렬, "고전 유럽사회학의 지적 모체:19세기 유럽 지성계의 지형" 한국이론사회학회 (6) : 35-81, 2005
4 최종렬, "고전 유럽 사회학" 한국인문사회과학회 29 (29): 139-170, 2005
5 최종렬, "계몽주의, 대항계몽주의, 반계몽주의" 한국이론사회학회 (5) : 123-181, 2004
6 Acker, Joan, "Women and Social Stratification: A Case of Intellectual Sexism" 78 (78): 174-183, 1973
7 Connell, R. W., "Why Is Classical Theory Classical?" 102 (102): 1511-1557, 1997
8 Alexander, Jeffrey C., "Twenty Lectures: Sociological Theory Since World War II" Columbia University Press 1987
9 Parsons, Talcott, "The Structure of Social Action: A Study in Social Theory with Special Reference to a Group of Recent European Writers, Vo1. 1 and Vol. 2" Free Press 1968
10 Berger, Peter L., "The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Garden City" Doubleday 1966
11 Lal, Barbara B., "The Romance of Culture in an Urban Civilization: Robert E. Park on Race and Ethnic Relations in Cities" Routledge 1990
12 Chodorow, Nancy, "The Reproduction of Mothering, Berkeley" University of California Press 1978
13 Greek, Cecil E., "The Religious Roots of American Sociology" Garland 1992
14 Goffman, Erving, "The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life" Anchor Books 1959
15 Thomas, William, "The Polish Peasant in Europe and America: A Classic Work in Immigration History" University of Illinois Press 1996
16 Homans, George, "The Nature of Social Science" Harcourt, Brace & World 1967
17 Alexander, Jeffrey C., "The Micro-Macro Link, Berkeley" University of California Press 1987
18 Turner, Stephen, "The Impossible Science: An Institutional Analysis of American Sociology" Sage 1990
19 Bertens, Hans, "The Idea of the Postmodern: A History" Routledge 1995
20 Bell, Daniel, "The Coming of Post-Industrial Society" Basic Books 1973
21 Gouldner, Alvin W., "The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology" Basic Books 1970
22 Bulmer, Martin, "The Chicago School of Sociology: Institutionalization, Diversity, and the Rise of Sociological Research" University of Chicago Press 1984
23 Scott, John F., "The Changing Foundations of the Parsonian Action Scheme" 28 : 716-735, 1963
24 Brownstein, Larry, "Talcott Parsons’s General Action Scheme: An Investigation of Fundamental Principles" Schenkman 1982
25 Blumer, Herbert, "Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method" University of California Press 1969
26 Lemert, Charles C., "Sociology and the Twilight of Man: Homocentrism and Discourse in Sociological Theory, Carbondale and Edwardsville" Southern Illinois University Press 1979
27 Bannister, Robert C., "Sociology and Scientism: The American Quest for Objectivity, 1880-1940" The University of North Carolina Press 1987
28 Mills, C. Wright, "Sociology and Pragmatism: The Higher Learning in America" Paine-Whitman Publishers 1964
29 Timasheff, Nicholas S., "Sociological Theory Today" 11 : 25-33, 1950
30 Homans, George, "Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms" Harcourt, Brace & World 1961
31 Agger, Ben, "Public Sociology: From Social Facts to Literary Acts, Lanham" Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2000
32 Kumar, Jrishan, "Prophecy and Progress: The Sociology of Industrial and Post-Industrial Society" Penguin Books 1978
33 Joas, Hans, "Pragmatism and Social Theory" University of Chicago Press 1993
34 Shalin, Dmitri, "Pragmatism and Social Interactionism" 51 : 9-29, 1986
35 Mills, C. Wright, "Power, Politics and People" Oxford University Press 1963
36 Woodiwiss, Anthony, "Postmodernity USA: The Crisis of Social Modernism in Postwar America" Sage 1993
37 Dickens, David R., "Postmodernism and Social Inquiry" The Guilford Press 1994
38 Harvey, Lee, "Myths of the Chicago School of Sociology, Brookfield" Avebury 1987
39 Mead, George H., "Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist" University of Chicago Press 1962
40 Morris, Charles W., "Introduction: George H. Mead as Social Psychologist and Social Philosopher, in Mind, Self and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist" University of Chicago Press 1962
41 Martindale, Don, "Institutions, Organization, and Mass Society" Houghton Mifflin Company 1966
42 Denzin, Norman, "Images of Postmodern Society: Social Theory and Contemporary Cinema" Sage 1991
43 Huaco, George A., "Ideology and General Theory: The Case of Sociological Functionalism" 28 (28): 34-54, 1986
44 Cooley, Charles, "Human Nature and the Social Order" Charles Scribner’s Sons 1922
45 Cook, Gary, A., "George Herbert Mead: The Making of a Social Pragmatist" University of Illinois Press 1993
46 Chafetz, Janet S., "From Sex/Gender Roles to Gender Stratification: From Victim Blame to System Blame, Feminist Foundations: Toward Transforming Sociology" Sage 159-164, 1998
47 Hinkle, Roscoe, "Founding Theory of American Sociology, 1881∼1915" Routledge & Kegan Paul 1980
48 Clough, Patricia T., "Feminist Thought: Desire, Power, and Academic Discourse" Blackwell 1994
49 Tong, Rosemarie, "Feminist Thought: A Comprehensive Introduction" Westview 1989
50 Myers, Kristen A., "Feminist Foundations: Toward Transforming Sociology" Sage 1988
51 Parsons, Talcott, "Family, Socialization and Interaction Process" Free Press 1955
52 Manning, Philip, "Erving Goffman and Modern Sociology" Stanford University Press 1992
53 Hinkle, Roscoe, "Developments in American Sociology, 1915∼1950, Albany" State University of New York 1994
54 Turner, Jonathan H., "Current Folklore in the Criticisms of Parsonian Action Theory" 44 (44): 47-55, 1974
55 Seidman, Steve, "Contested Knowledge: Social Theory in the Postmodern Era" Blackwell 1994
56 Collins, Randall, "Conflict Sociology: Toward an Explanatory Science" Academic Press 1975
57 Lewis, David J., "American Sociology and Pragmatism: Mead, Chicago Sociology, and Symbolic Interactionism" University of Chicago Press 1980
58 Garfinkel, Harold, "1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology, Englewood Cliffs" Prentice-Hall 1967
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2028 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2022-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2019-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2016-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2012-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2008-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2006-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.25 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 1.12 | 1.07 | 2.101 | 0 |