RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    정보화 시대의 신학교육을 위한 다중지능적 접근

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76345635

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper is an attempt to make a conversation between theological education and Howard Gardner's Multiple Intelligences (MI) theory in the context of the information and technology era. From its emergence in the 1980s, MI theory has been usually applied to education for children or youth. Although it has not been actively applied to adult education, MI theory has strong implications for adult education as well as for theological education. Keeping this in mind, this paper focuses on theological education in terms of such key concepts as: 1) disciplinary understanding, 2) multi-modal teaching and learning methods, 3) Good Work, and 4) a transversal model of interdisciplinary conversation in MI theory. First, the concept of disciplinary understanding of MI theory awakens theological education to the importance of the contextual, performative, and intuitive nature of understanding. Second, the concept of multi-modal teaching and learning methods helps theological education employ various creative and alternative teaching and learning methods. Third, the concept of Good Work imbues theological education with the significance of the unity between the professional and ethical aspect in educating pastoral leadership. Fourth, a transversal model of interdisciplinary conversation provides theological education a fresh way of interdisciplinary dialogue that helps keep both the integrity and intelligence of theology and theological education together. Despite the significance of MI theory for theological education, this paper, however, does not accept the reductionist attitude that MI can provide all the answers to theological education. In this sense, the interdisciplinary dialogue between theology and other disciplines in this paper is made in a transversal manner.
    번역하기

    This paper is an attempt to make a conversation between theological education and Howard Gardner's Multiple Intelligences (MI) theory in the context of the information and technology era. From its emergence in the 1980s, MI theory has been usually app...

    This paper is an attempt to make a conversation between theological education and Howard Gardner's Multiple Intelligences (MI) theory in the context of the information and technology era. From its emergence in the 1980s, MI theory has been usually applied to education for children or youth. Although it has not been actively applied to adult education, MI theory has strong implications for adult education as well as for theological education. Keeping this in mind, this paper focuses on theological education in terms of such key concepts as: 1) disciplinary understanding, 2) multi-modal teaching and learning methods, 3) Good Work, and 4) a transversal model of interdisciplinary conversation in MI theory. First, the concept of disciplinary understanding of MI theory awakens theological education to the importance of the contextual, performative, and intuitive nature of understanding. Second, the concept of multi-modal teaching and learning methods helps theological education employ various creative and alternative teaching and learning methods. Third, the concept of Good Work imbues theological education with the significance of the unity between the professional and ethical aspect in educating pastoral leadership. Fourth, a transversal model of interdisciplinary conversation provides theological education a fresh way of interdisciplinary dialogue that helps keep both the integrity and intelligence of theology and theological education together. Despite the significance of MI theory for theological education, this paper, however, does not accept the reductionist attitude that MI can provide all the answers to theological education. In this sense, the interdisciplinary dialogue between theology and other disciplines in this paper is made in a transversal manner.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼