RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    중복등기의 효력과 등기부취득시효 = Validity of duplication of registration and Acquisitive prescription by register

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101824112

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Duplicated registration refers to the case when an identica1 rea1 estate was registered more than twice. It should not take place, but in reality there are many duplicated registration of rea1 estate as far as a real estate is concerned and a plenty of case law to deal with it. It is high1y debated among scholars which registration out of duplicated ones is valid and change of the precedent is witnessed. The current Korean Supreme Court takes on the so-called, ``procedural eclecticism,`` which means that the latter registration is invalid unless the former is not originally void. This approach is based on principle of one registration form per one rea1 estate pursuant to section 15 of Registration of Rea1 Estate Act. However, the principle mere1y means that additiona1 registration can not be carried out if one registration form was fi1led out for one rea1 estate. As a result when the registration sheet was filled out twice for one rea1 estate, we do not need to infer that the 1atter registration becomes invalid unless the former is void. What is most important in determining the validity of the duplicated registration is to comply with ``substantive law`` approach, which argues that the only registration identica1 to substantive 1egal re1ationship is valid. As far as acquisitive prescription by register is concerned, the Court he1d that invalid, duplicated registration can be its subject-matter because it is limited to the registration which does not violate the principle of one registration form per one real estate. But the Court`s view is problematic. It is desirable for us to, in principle, interprete that the duplicated registration is subject to acquisitive prescription by register.
    번역하기

    Duplicated registration refers to the case when an identica1 rea1 estate was registered more than twice. It should not take place, but in reality there are many duplicated registration of rea1 estate as far as a real estate is concerned and a plenty o...

    Duplicated registration refers to the case when an identica1 rea1 estate was registered more than twice. It should not take place, but in reality there are many duplicated registration of rea1 estate as far as a real estate is concerned and a plenty of case law to deal with it. It is high1y debated among scholars which registration out of duplicated ones is valid and change of the precedent is witnessed. The current Korean Supreme Court takes on the so-called, ``procedural eclecticism,`` which means that the latter registration is invalid unless the former is not originally void. This approach is based on principle of one registration form per one rea1 estate pursuant to section 15 of Registration of Rea1 Estate Act. However, the principle mere1y means that additiona1 registration can not be carried out if one registration form was fi1led out for one rea1 estate. As a result when the registration sheet was filled out twice for one rea1 estate, we do not need to infer that the 1atter registration becomes invalid unless the former is void. What is most important in determining the validity of the duplicated registration is to comply with ``substantive law`` approach, which argues that the only registration identica1 to substantive 1egal re1ationship is valid. As far as acquisitive prescription by register is concerned, the Court he1d that invalid, duplicated registration can be its subject-matter because it is limited to the registration which does not violate the principle of one registration form per one real estate. But the Court`s view is problematic. It is desirable for us to, in principle, interprete that the duplicated registration is subject to acquisitive prescription by register.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.69 0.69 0.62
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.6 0.55 0.818 0.23
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼