RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCI SCIE SCOPUS

    Low Cycle Fatigue Performance and Failure Analysis of Reinforcing Bar

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107936938

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Low cycle fatigue (LCF) behaviour and associated failure mechanisms of a thermo-mechanically treated Fe 500D steel rebarhave been experimentally evaluated with a view to assess its performance under seismic condition. The total axial straincontrolledLCF tests have been performed at five different strain amplitudes (± 0.30 to ± 1.00%) at ambient temperature untilfailure maintaining a constant true strain rate of 1 × 10− 3 s− 1 and a fixed strain ratio of − 1. Fatigue data have been analysedfollowing both strain–life and plastic strain energy–life relationships; while, macro as well as micro features of the failedspecimens, have been critically examined. These are supplemented by microstructural characterizations in addition to tensileand hardness measurements. Significant reduction of yield strength is recorded under dynamic loading which is responsiblefor considerable cyclic softening of rebar till failure in all strain amplitudes indicating the deterioration of seismic resistanceproperty. Both strain–life and plastic strain energy–life relationships are found to accurately predict the cyclic plasticbehaviour of the selected rebar. A near Masing behaviour is established by three different analytical approaches. The fatiguecrack is always found to initiate at the transverse rib root and primarily propagates alongside the rim region.
    번역하기

    Low cycle fatigue (LCF) behaviour and associated failure mechanisms of a thermo-mechanically treated Fe 500D steel rebarhave been experimentally evaluated with a view to assess its performance under seismic condition. The total axial straincontrolledL...

    Low cycle fatigue (LCF) behaviour and associated failure mechanisms of a thermo-mechanically treated Fe 500D steel rebarhave been experimentally evaluated with a view to assess its performance under seismic condition. The total axial straincontrolledLCF tests have been performed at five different strain amplitudes (± 0.30 to ± 1.00%) at ambient temperature untilfailure maintaining a constant true strain rate of 1 × 10− 3 s− 1 and a fixed strain ratio of − 1. Fatigue data have been analysedfollowing both strain–life and plastic strain energy–life relationships; while, macro as well as micro features of the failedspecimens, have been critically examined. These are supplemented by microstructural characterizations in addition to tensileand hardness measurements. Significant reduction of yield strength is recorded under dynamic loading which is responsiblefor considerable cyclic softening of rebar till failure in all strain amplitudes indicating the deterioration of seismic resistanceproperty. Both strain–life and plastic strain energy–life relationships are found to accurately predict the cyclic plasticbehaviour of the selected rebar. A near Masing behaviour is established by three different analytical approaches. The fatiguecrack is always found to initiate at the transverse rib root and primarily propagates alongside the rim region.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 U. M. Angst, 50 : 143-, 2017

    2 R. Kumar, 138 : 42-, 2012

    3 G. P. Tilly, 2 : 251-, 1979

    4 J. G. MacGregor, 68 : 169-, 1971

    5 Y. Shi, 67 : 1185-, 2011

    6 G. Jha, 1 : 53-, 2001

    7 J. B. Mander, 6 : 453-, 1994

    8 G. M. Sheng, 10 : 51-, 1997

    9 Y. Lv, 48 : 67-, 2013

    10 S. K. Paul, 54 : 170-, 2014

    1 U. M. Angst, 50 : 143-, 2017

    2 R. Kumar, 138 : 42-, 2012

    3 G. P. Tilly, 2 : 251-, 1979

    4 J. G. MacGregor, 68 : 169-, 1971

    5 Y. Shi, 67 : 1185-, 2011

    6 G. Jha, 1 : 53-, 2001

    7 J. B. Mander, 6 : 453-, 1994

    8 G. M. Sheng, 10 : 51-, 1997

    9 Y. Lv, 48 : 67-, 2013

    10 S. K. Paul, 54 : 170-, 2014

    11 C. A. Apostolopoulos, 21 : 1447-, 2007

    12 M. M. Kashani, 77 : 174-, 2015

    13 L. Yang, 165 : 688-, 2018

    14 J. A. Abdalla, 30 : 4405-, 2009

    15 R. A. Hawileh, 33 : 397-, 2010

    16 N. H. Bar, 22 : 1701-, 2013

    17 S. K. Paul, 58 : 402-, 2014

    18 H. Zheng, 20 : 767-, 1998

    19 H. Zheng, 11 : 158-, 1999

    20 M. M. Kashani, 94 : 644-, 2015

    21 R. Dhakal, 128 : 1139-, 2002

    22 C. P. Basu, 18 : 19-, 2004

    23 B. Das, 4 : 2554-, 2017

    24 M. Rocha, 28 : 04016012-, 2016

    25 S. Majumdar, 30 : 407313-, 2018

    26 M. Rocha, 75 : 205-, 2015

    27 M. Rocha, 75 : 198-, 2015

    28 P. Y. Lu, 22 : 1149-, 2015

    29 A. Ray, 6 : 335-, 1997

    30 C. S. Park, 9 : 2938-, 2019

    31 B. K. Panigrahi, 25 : 319-, 2002

    32 P. C. Chakraborti, 27 : 511-, 2005

    33 A. Nagesha, 24 : 1285-, 2002

    34 S. Nandy, 69 : 319-, 2016

    35 D. Eifer, 12 : 165-, 1990

    36 Y. Jiang, 24 : 1481-, 2008

    37 H. W. Höppel, 82 : 1781-, 2002

    38 K. Guguloth, 604 : 196-, 2014

    39 S. K. Paul, 43 : 705-, 2011

    40 L. Taleb, 25 : 1359-, 2009

    41 H. F. Chai, 93 : 159-, 1987

    42 K. Hussain, 11 : 25-, 1993

    43 H. J. Maier, 28 : 243-, 2006

    44 K. Golos, 110 : 36-, 1988

    45 S. Nandy, 97 : 1978-, 2017

    46 A. Plumtree, 23 : 799-, 2001

    47 P. P. Sarkar, 707 : 125-, 2017

    48 L. P. Borrego, 11 : 715-, 2004

    49 O. H. Basquin, 10 : 6-, 1910

    50 L. F. Cofn Jr., 76 : 931-, 1954

    51 D. J. Quesnel, 30 : 233-, 1977

    52 A. Nleslony, 30 : 1967-, 2008

    53 B. Tomkins, 18 : 1041-, 1968

    54 A. V. Farahani, 22 : 295-, 2000

    55 S. Kłysz, 8 : 193-, 2005

    56 T. Xiaoyan, 3 : 123-, 1990

    57 H. J. Kim, 379 : 210-, 2004

    58 G. R. Halford, 1 : 3-, 1966

    59 B. Das, 138 : 125-, 2019

    60 N. E. Prasad, 30 : 1497-, 1994

    61 G. Pantazopoulos, 101 : 180-, 2019

    62 P. Verma, 652 : 30-, 2016

    63 R. Branco, 58 : 28-, 2012

    64 S.S. Manson, "Manson, Behavior of Materials Under Conditions of Thermal Stress" University of Michigan Engineering Research Institute 9-75, 1953

    65 S. H. Kwon, "Low Cycle Fatigue Properties and an Energy-Based Approach for as-Extruded AZ31 Magnesium Alloy" 대한금속·재료학회 17 (17): 207-213, 2011

    66 J.A. Bannantine, "Fundamental of Metal Fatigue Analysis" Prentice Hall 1990

    67 S. Suresh, "Fatigue of Materials" Cambridge University Press 1998

    68 신종호, "Effects of Grain Size on the Fatigue Properties in Cold‑Expanded Austenitic HNSs" 대한금속·재료학회 24 (24): 1412-1421, 2018

    69 J.D. Morrow, "Cyclic plastic strain energy and fatigue of materials, in Internal Friction, Damping and Cyclic Plasticity, ASTM STP 378"

    70 "Bureau of Indian Standards, High Strength Deformed Steel Bars and Wires for Concrete Reinforced-Specifcation, BIS 1786: 2008"

    71 "ASTM E606-12 standard practice for strain-controlled fatigue testing" ASTM International 2012

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
    2009-12-29 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한금속ㆍ재료학회 -> 대한금속·재료학회 KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 SCI 등재 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 2.05 0.91 1.31
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.03 0.86 0.678 0.22
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼