RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    중국 농촌집체토지수급경영권의 징수와 보상제도 = A Legal Analysis of the Problems Arising From the Land Requisition of the Management of Rights to Contracted Land in China

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76447843

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The rural collective organization is a pluralistic one composed of township-village governments, rural collective organizations, villager committees, villagers' groups. The larger subcategory is, the more lump-sum land compensation money is being paid. Farmers who belong to the smallest subcategory are evaluated to get less than 50% of the total compensation money.
    Constitution says that the need for public interest can be a necessary condition for land requisition, but this provision is improperly used for the purpose of commercial development. This phenomenon has failed to the original purpose of nationalization-oriented land system.
    Farmers fall a sacrifice of rural collective land requisition in the name of public interest. More worse is that failing compensation system does not help farmers live at the subsistence level, which is the main cause of social unrest.
    The rural collective land system cannot protect the whole farmers' interest due to too limited compensation standard and coverage. Province or city governments have been delegated to make specific compensation standards according to Land Management Law, which leads to different compensation amounts among regions.
    The administration in charge of requisition provides the solution for compensation disputes, not People's Court. This is out of accordance with modern lawful procedure.
    New Real Rights Law gives legal protection to farmers who has the right to cultivate their land in spite of this phenomenon. It deserves people's attention in terms of giving farmers the legal protection against the violation of their rights. It matters with respect to the protection of private property rights.
    번역하기

    The rural collective organization is a pluralistic one composed of township-village governments, rural collective organizations, villager committees, villagers' groups. The larger subcategory is, the more lump-sum land compensation money is being paid...

    The rural collective organization is a pluralistic one composed of township-village governments, rural collective organizations, villager committees, villagers' groups. The larger subcategory is, the more lump-sum land compensation money is being paid. Farmers who belong to the smallest subcategory are evaluated to get less than 50% of the total compensation money.
    Constitution says that the need for public interest can be a necessary condition for land requisition, but this provision is improperly used for the purpose of commercial development. This phenomenon has failed to the original purpose of nationalization-oriented land system.
    Farmers fall a sacrifice of rural collective land requisition in the name of public interest. More worse is that failing compensation system does not help farmers live at the subsistence level, which is the main cause of social unrest.
    The rural collective land system cannot protect the whole farmers' interest due to too limited compensation standard and coverage. Province or city governments have been delegated to make specific compensation standards according to Land Management Law, which leads to different compensation amounts among regions.
    The administration in charge of requisition provides the solution for compensation disputes, not People's Court. This is out of accordance with modern lawful procedure.
    New Real Rights Law gives legal protection to farmers who has the right to cultivate their land in spite of this phenomenon. It deserves people's attention in terms of giving farmers the legal protection against the violation of their rights. It matters with respect to the protection of private property rights.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 논의의 배경
    • Ⅱ. 중국 농촌집체구성원의 법적 지위
    • Ⅲ. 농촌집체토지수급경영권의 법적 성질
    • Ⅳ. 농촌 토지수급경영권자의 권리의무
    • Ⅴ. 농촌집체토지수급경영권의 징수
    • Ⅰ. 논의의 배경
    • Ⅱ. 중국 농촌집체구성원의 법적 지위
    • Ⅲ. 농촌집체토지수급경영권의 법적 성질
    • Ⅳ. 농촌 토지수급경영권자의 권리의무
    • Ⅴ. 농촌집체토지수급경영권의 징수
    • Ⅵ. 농촌집체토지수급경영권의 보상
    • Ⅶ. 결
    • 참고 문헌
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이정표, "중국통일계약법" 한울아카데미 2002

    2 이영수, "중국의 토지수용과 보상제도에 관한 연구" 국토연구원 45 : 105-118, 2005

    3 정이근, "중국공법학연구" 도서출판 오름 2007

    4 汪振江, "農村土地産權與徵收 補償問題硏究" 中國人民大學出版社 2008

    5 李才銳, "農村土地承包土地徵用的法律思考" 廣西社會科學 2004

    6 王效賢, "論土地承包經營權的性質"

    7 王利明, "物權法硏究" 中國人民大學出版社 2007

    8 常鵬翶, "物權法典型判例硏究" 人民法院出版社 2007

    9 孙承毅, "浅谈对“农村集体经济组织成员”资格的确认"

    10 張俊浩, "民法學原理" 中國政法大學出版社 2000

    1 이정표, "중국통일계약법" 한울아카데미 2002

    2 이영수, "중국의 토지수용과 보상제도에 관한 연구" 국토연구원 45 : 105-118, 2005

    3 정이근, "중국공법학연구" 도서출판 오름 2007

    4 汪振江, "農村土地産權與徵收 補償問題硏究" 中國人民大學出版社 2008

    5 李才銳, "農村土地承包土地徵用的法律思考" 廣西社會科學 2004

    6 王效賢, "論土地承包經營權的性質"

    7 王利明, "物權法硏究" 中國人民大學出版社 2007

    8 常鵬翶, "物權法典型判例硏究" 人民法院出版社 2007

    9 孙承毅, "浅谈对“农村集体经济组织成员”资格的确认"

    10 張俊浩, "民法學原理" 中國政法大學出版社 2000

    11 王利明, "民法" 中國人民大學出版社 2007

    12 朱啓臻, "新農村建設與失地農民補償" 中國土地 2006

    13 胡锦光, "我国宪法上“公共利益”的界定"

    14 李集合, "土地徵收徵用法律制度硏究" 中國政法大學出版社 2008

    15 李集合, "土地徵收徵用法律制度硏究" 中國政法大學出版社 2008

    16 屈茂辉, "国有资产取得制度探析"

    17 中國社會科學院法學研究所物權法研究課題組, "制定中國物權法的基本思路"

    18 冯琦, "农村集体土地征收补偿费分配纠纷案件特点、成因及对策"

    19 김용길, "中國의 國家所有權制度에 관한 考察" 법학연구소 19 (19): 901-920, 2007

    20 江平, "中國土地立法研究" 中國政法大學出版社 1999

    21 王衛國, "中國土地權利硏究" 中國政法大學出版社 1997

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2028 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-04-22 학회명변경 영문명 : The Association For Korean Law Of Property -> THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF PROPERTY LAW KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-10-14 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> THE JOURNAL OF PROPERTY LAW KCI등재후보
    2004-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.89 0.89 0.74
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.72 0.71 0.86 0.22
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼