RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      중등 고전문학 작품 ‘남성적-여성적 어조’ 지도의 문제 = A Study on Teaching Method about ‘Masculine-tone’ and ‘Feminine-tone’ in the Secondary School Course Pre-modern Literature

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106979731

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Learning ‘tone’ is important works in secondary school curriculum because it is closely related to the situation of the narrator or mood of the poem. In particular, categorizing the tone according to gender, such as ‘male-tone’ and ‘feminine-tone’, used continuously for analyzing poetry. This study attempts to raise the issue of masculine and feminine tone that we have used customarily. We specifically analyzed the above problems through practical questions from students, and also analyzed textbooks and instructional textbooks for teachers. Furthermore, We deviated from a fixed understanding of gender, proposed a realistic method to students to learning literature more actively and effectively.
      Distinction between the two tones through cultural gender attributes is issue for current middle and high school students. This is because they are no longer able to accept male and female attributes against cultural tradition. Even now, many textbooks analyze poetry that should be basically learned in our literature according to gender attributes. For example, the feminine tone is soft and delicate, and lt used mourning or longing stand out, and the masculine tone is used harsh strong poetry or the intense feelings appear.
      This distinction has limitations that it is not possible to answer whether gender itself and emotional characteristics correspond. It is not the way it has been used before. Decisively, the effectiveness of this method is also weak, because students should be given additional explanations of ‘what is masculine?’, ‘what is feminine?’. If this method continues, can also have negative influence for students to internalize stereotypes by gender during they grow. Therefore, instead of the distinction between masculine and feminine tones, Expressions that evaluate the Narrator’s ‘emotion’ should be recommended, such as a soft tone and rigid tone.
      번역하기

      Learning ‘tone’ is important works in secondary school curriculum because it is closely related to the situation of the narrator or mood of the poem. In particular, categorizing the tone according to gender, such as ‘male-tone’ and ‘feminine...

      Learning ‘tone’ is important works in secondary school curriculum because it is closely related to the situation of the narrator or mood of the poem. In particular, categorizing the tone according to gender, such as ‘male-tone’ and ‘feminine-tone’, used continuously for analyzing poetry. This study attempts to raise the issue of masculine and feminine tone that we have used customarily. We specifically analyzed the above problems through practical questions from students, and also analyzed textbooks and instructional textbooks for teachers. Furthermore, We deviated from a fixed understanding of gender, proposed a realistic method to students to learning literature more actively and effectively.
      Distinction between the two tones through cultural gender attributes is issue for current middle and high school students. This is because they are no longer able to accept male and female attributes against cultural tradition. Even now, many textbooks analyze poetry that should be basically learned in our literature according to gender attributes. For example, the feminine tone is soft and delicate, and lt used mourning or longing stand out, and the masculine tone is used harsh strong poetry or the intense feelings appear.
      This distinction has limitations that it is not possible to answer whether gender itself and emotional characteristics correspond. It is not the way it has been used before. Decisively, the effectiveness of this method is also weak, because students should be given additional explanations of ‘what is masculine?’, ‘what is feminine?’. If this method continues, can also have negative influence for students to internalize stereotypes by gender during they grow. Therefore, instead of the distinction between masculine and feminine tones, Expressions that evaluate the Narrator’s ‘emotion’ should be recommended, such as a soft tone and rigid tone.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김미환, "현장 교육학-교육의 이론과 실제" 동문사 2011

      2 "한국검인정교과서협회"

      3 문광영, "시 작법의 논리와 전략" 개미 2017

      4 장정수, "송강가사" 신구문화사 2006

      5 미케발, "서사란 무엇인가" 문예출판사 1999

      6 강영준, "국어선생님도 궁금한 101가지 문학질문사전" 북멘토 2013

      7 김양은, "구성주의 교육방법에 의한 시 어조 교육 방안" 부경대학교 교육대학원 2010

      8 교육부, "교육부 고시 제2015-74호 [별책 5] 국어과 교육과정"

      9 한국고전여성문학회, "고전문학과 여성화자 그 글쓰기의 전략" 월인 2003

      10 한철우, "고등학교 문학-연구용 교과서" 비상 2009

      1 김미환, "현장 교육학-교육의 이론과 실제" 동문사 2011

      2 "한국검인정교과서협회"

      3 문광영, "시 작법의 논리와 전략" 개미 2017

      4 장정수, "송강가사" 신구문화사 2006

      5 미케발, "서사란 무엇인가" 문예출판사 1999

      6 강영준, "국어선생님도 궁금한 101가지 문학질문사전" 북멘토 2013

      7 김양은, "구성주의 교육방법에 의한 시 어조 교육 방안" 부경대학교 교육대학원 2010

      8 교육부, "교육부 고시 제2015-74호 [별책 5] 국어과 교육과정"

      9 한국고전여성문학회, "고전문학과 여성화자 그 글쓰기의 전략" 월인 2003

      10 한철우, "고등학교 문학-연구용 교과서" 비상 2009

      11 이삼형, "고등학교 국어-연구용 교과서" 지학사 2015

      12 김동환, "고등학교 국어-교사용 교과서" 교학사 2015

      13 박안수, "고등학교 국어-교과서" 비상 2015

      14 이삼형, "고등학교 국어-교과서" 지학사 2015

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.38 0.38 0.38
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.36 0.37 0.882 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼