RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Prevalence of Undiagnosed Diabetes in Patient with Random Serum Glucose Over 200 mg/dL in an Emergency Department in Korea: Preliminary Study

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104607256

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of diabetes in patients with random serum glucose over 200 mg/dL in an emergency department.
      Methods: A retrospective descriptive pilot study was conducted using chart review of patients who have visited the ED at Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital. Between April and October 2014, patients aged 18 years and older with random serum glucose level higher than 200 mg/dL and having no prior diabetes mellitus (DM) were enrolled.
      Regardless of the patient’s chief complaint, a history of current symptoms related to diabetes of patients was obtained and additional serum HbA1c was measured. The follow-up test was recommended on endocrinology OPD or the inpatient ward. Patients’ medical records regarding diagnosis of DM were reviewed.
      Results: A total of 296 patients with random serum glucose level estimated above 200 mg/dL without previous DM history were enrolled in this study, however only 82 patients were eligible. Among them, 34 patients (41.4%) were newly diagnosed as DM; 38 patients had current presumptive symptoms of diabetes while 44 patients had none of those symptoms. Twenty three patients (60.5%) with presumptive diabetes symptoms were diagnosed as diabetes while another 15 patients (39.5%) were not. Eleven (25.0%) patients without symptoms of diabetes were diagnosed as diabetes while 33 patients (75.0%) were not. The difference between two groups was significant. (p=0.001) Conclusion: The prevalence of undiagnosed DM patients in patients with random serum glucose level over 200 mg/dL in the emergency department was considerably high.
      Therefore emergency physicians should pay attention to opportunistic hyperglycemia and active diabetes screening.
      번역하기

      Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of diabetes in patients with random serum glucose over 200 mg/dL in an emergency department. Methods: A retrospective descriptive pilot study was conducted using chart review of patients w...

      Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of diabetes in patients with random serum glucose over 200 mg/dL in an emergency department.
      Methods: A retrospective descriptive pilot study was conducted using chart review of patients who have visited the ED at Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital. Between April and October 2014, patients aged 18 years and older with random serum glucose level higher than 200 mg/dL and having no prior diabetes mellitus (DM) were enrolled.
      Regardless of the patient’s chief complaint, a history of current symptoms related to diabetes of patients was obtained and additional serum HbA1c was measured. The follow-up test was recommended on endocrinology OPD or the inpatient ward. Patients’ medical records regarding diagnosis of DM were reviewed.
      Results: A total of 296 patients with random serum glucose level estimated above 200 mg/dL without previous DM history were enrolled in this study, however only 82 patients were eligible. Among them, 34 patients (41.4%) were newly diagnosed as DM; 38 patients had current presumptive symptoms of diabetes while 44 patients had none of those symptoms. Twenty three patients (60.5%) with presumptive diabetes symptoms were diagnosed as diabetes while another 15 patients (39.5%) were not. Eleven (25.0%) patients without symptoms of diabetes were diagnosed as diabetes while 33 patients (75.0%) were not. The difference between two groups was significant. (p=0.001) Conclusion: The prevalence of undiagnosed DM patients in patients with random serum glucose level over 200 mg/dL in the emergency department was considerably high.
      Therefore emergency physicians should pay attention to opportunistic hyperglycemia and active diabetes screening.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Ginde AA, "Value of risk stratification to increase the predictive validity of HbA1c in screening for undiagnosed diabetes in the US population" 23 : 1346-1353, 2008

      2 Agardh E, "Type 2 diabetes incidence and socio-economic position : a systematic review and meta-analysis" 40 : 804-818, 2011

      3 Silverman RA, "The relationship of plasma glucose and HbA1c Levels among emergency department patients with no prior history of diabetes mellitus" 13 : 722-726, 2006

      4 Jelinek GA, "Screening for type 2 diabetes with random finger-prick glucose and bedside HbA1c in an Australian emergency department" 22 : 427-434, 2010

      5 Babcock IC, "Preventive care in the emergency department, Part II: Clinical preventive services - an emergency medicine evidence-based review. Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Public Health and Education Task Force Preventive Services Work Group" 7 : 1042-1054, 2000

      6 Menchine MD, "Prevalence of undiagnosed and suboptimally controlled diabetes by point-of-care HbA1c in unselected emergency department patients" 18 : 326-329, 2011

      7 Xu Y, "Prevalence and control of diabetes in Chinese adults" 310 : 948-959, 2013

      8 Rolka DB, "Performance of recommended screening tests for undiagnosed diabetes and dysglycemia" 24 : 1899-1903, 2001

      9 Gillett MJ, "International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1c assay in the diagnosis of diabetes" 32 : 1327-1334, 2009

      10 Magee MF, "Hemoglobin A1c testing in an emergency department" 5 : 1437-1443, 2011

      1 Ginde AA, "Value of risk stratification to increase the predictive validity of HbA1c in screening for undiagnosed diabetes in the US population" 23 : 1346-1353, 2008

      2 Agardh E, "Type 2 diabetes incidence and socio-economic position : a systematic review and meta-analysis" 40 : 804-818, 2011

      3 Silverman RA, "The relationship of plasma glucose and HbA1c Levels among emergency department patients with no prior history of diabetes mellitus" 13 : 722-726, 2006

      4 Jelinek GA, "Screening for type 2 diabetes with random finger-prick glucose and bedside HbA1c in an Australian emergency department" 22 : 427-434, 2010

      5 Babcock IC, "Preventive care in the emergency department, Part II: Clinical preventive services - an emergency medicine evidence-based review. Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Public Health and Education Task Force Preventive Services Work Group" 7 : 1042-1054, 2000

      6 Menchine MD, "Prevalence of undiagnosed and suboptimally controlled diabetes by point-of-care HbA1c in unselected emergency department patients" 18 : 326-329, 2011

      7 Xu Y, "Prevalence and control of diabetes in Chinese adults" 310 : 948-959, 2013

      8 Rolka DB, "Performance of recommended screening tests for undiagnosed diabetes and dysglycemia" 24 : 1899-1903, 2001

      9 Gillett MJ, "International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1c assay in the diagnosis of diabetes" 32 : 1327-1334, 2009

      10 Magee MF, "Hemoglobin A1c testing in an emergency department" 5 : 1437-1443, 2011

      11 US Department of Health and Human Services, "Healthy people 2010" US Government Printing Office 5-3, 2000

      12 American Diabetes Association, "Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus" 36 (36): S67-S74, 2013

      13 Chan JC, "Diabetes in Asia" 301 : 2129-2140, 2009

      14 Tabaei BP, "Community-based screening for diabetes in Michigan" 26 : 668-670, 2003

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2020-05-08 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Society Of Emergency Medicine -> The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.23 0.23 0.22
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.22 0.22 0.339 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼