RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    共同體主義의 自由主義批判과 그 理論的 特性 = Communitarian Critique of Liberalism and Its Theoretical Characteristics

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19575279

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In this paper, the charateristics of contemporary commanitarianism are investigated. Commanitarianism is a trend of thought which admits the constitutive value of community and systematizes the theory justifying it. This communitarianism, represented by the writers such as Michael Sandel. Alasdair Maclntyre and Charles Taylor, describes community as a body of persons maintaining their identity through the shared self0understanding.
    Communitarians have systematized their theory in the process of the critique of liberal individualism connected with the moral anarchy of contemporary society and tried to revitalize the civic republican tradition in the West. They claim that 'the right of man' should be substituted by 'the common good'. And they emphasize the values of civic virtue, commumity and public participation. But their theory does not yet seem to possess the clarity as an idea because it does not explicitly explain the scale of commanity and the relation between community and politics.
    In the metaphysical·metaethical aspects, the communitarian view that liberalism's emphasis on the rights of man has become one of the main elements promoting the moral disorder, seems to be persuasive. However, we can find that the communitarian refutation about the theory of the rights of man itself is insufficent. And in the descriptive aspects. communitarians overemphasize the social and cultural influence on the identity of the individuals.
    Although the communitarian critique of the moral limits of liberalim is partly acknowledged, the adpotion of communitarian alternatives has to be accessed cautiously. For communitarians, it is necessary to especially develop the theories which can remove the authoritative and totalitarian possibility derived from the collective disposition of communitanianism.
    번역하기

    In this paper, the charateristics of contemporary commanitarianism are investigated. Commanitarianism is a trend of thought which admits the constitutive value of community and systematizes the theory justifying it. This communitarianism, represented ...

    In this paper, the charateristics of contemporary commanitarianism are investigated. Commanitarianism is a trend of thought which admits the constitutive value of community and systematizes the theory justifying it. This communitarianism, represented by the writers such as Michael Sandel. Alasdair Maclntyre and Charles Taylor, describes community as a body of persons maintaining their identity through the shared self0understanding.
    Communitarians have systematized their theory in the process of the critique of liberal individualism connected with the moral anarchy of contemporary society and tried to revitalize the civic republican tradition in the West. They claim that 'the right of man' should be substituted by 'the common good'. And they emphasize the values of civic virtue, commumity and public participation. But their theory does not yet seem to possess the clarity as an idea because it does not explicitly explain the scale of commanity and the relation between community and politics.
    In the metaphysical·metaethical aspects, the communitarian view that liberalism's emphasis on the rights of man has become one of the main elements promoting the moral disorder, seems to be persuasive. However, we can find that the communitarian refutation about the theory of the rights of man itself is insufficent. And in the descriptive aspects. communitarians overemphasize the social and cultural influence on the identity of the individuals.
    Although the communitarian critique of the moral limits of liberalim is partly acknowledged, the adpotion of communitarian alternatives has to be accessed cautiously. For communitarians, it is necessary to especially develop the theories which can remove the authoritative and totalitarian possibility derived from the collective disposition of communitanianism.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 序論
    • Ⅱ. 共同體主義와 共同體
    • 1. 共同體主義와 共同體主義者들
    • 2. 共同體主義와 共同體槪念
    • Ⅲ. 共同體主義의 自由主義批判과 그 基本理論
    • Ⅰ. 序論
    • Ⅱ. 共同體主義와 共同體
    • 1. 共同體主義와 共同體主義者들
    • 2. 共同體主義와 共同體槪念
    • Ⅲ. 共同體主義의 自由主義批判과 그 基本理論
    • 1. 形而上學的 메타윤리적 側面
    • 2. 敍述的 側面
    • 3. 規範的 側面
    • Ⅳ. 結論
    • 參考文獻
    • ABSTRACT
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼